• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Detax Canada

D'rok said:
We're not very important. This is the Internet, after all. But thanks for thinking so highly of us.

Trolling the JREF forums is easy to do. We like trolls. What's more revealing is just how quickly you showed up here after JLord's initial post. It smacks of desperation for an audience. Do you Google yourself daily in the hopes that someone, somewhere is talking about you?
Click to expand...

No. I have no problem with the positive exposure and hits on my website. I just noticed that there were a number of hits on my hitcounter from JREF Forum, and wondered what was triggering the hits on my website.

Then, I find a whole bunch of the fascist crowd chiming in to supposedly 'debunk' Detax Canada and Eldon Warman.

I find that a lawyer, who uses the old lawyer technique of lying by not giving all the fact or ignoring that which does not conform to his agenda, laying out the pattern for the debunking crowd to follow. Lying by omission is just as much lying as is stating falsehoods.

For instance, he says there is no mention of incorporated bodies being 'make believe ships at sea' in the legislation on the creation of incorporated bodies.

Does a nautical engineer have to explain what a ship is when he is designing and overseeing the building of a ship or vessel? If a body has bounds, boundaries, a hull or skin in which the body is contained, and has a captain (by whatever name), and 'officers' (by whatever name) and (crew) members (by whatever name), then that describes a ship at sea, or a make-believe ship at sea - an incorporated (from the Latin, 'corpus' meaning 'body'), where the word 'to incorporate means to assemble into a completed structure (body).

So, you all can continue your Eldon Warman bashing, as you obviously will; however, it makes no difference to me or my mission to help the Canadian and American men and women return to their true God Given status as free will men, and stop the enslavement and life/time ripoff that they now suffer.

You cannot affect my interests financially, as my detax program is totally free for the asking, and always has been since I went on the internet in January of 1998.

Therefore, if you wish to have any help or advice in recovering your Creator Diety given rights and freedoms, find my e-mail on my website.

Sticks and stones may break one's bones, but names can make you a slave!

Bye Bye!
 
Last edited:
EldonG said:
Well, if you look at the history of paper money, it was always 'promissory notes' to pay the real asset valued money, and the assets have historically in the caucasian world, gold or silver, and a measure thereof, as depicted in the US Coinage Act of 1793. When currency is not a promissory note, it is a pure 'con' game - with the term 'to con' meaning to defraud by deceit. Thus, you say that Canadian currency is valued by the CON-fidence of the Canadian people.
Click to expand...

It's not a con game because nobody is being decieved. It isn't as if they secretly switched to a fiat currency system and you are the only one to discover it and the rest are being fooled. It was a widely publicized event and it has been widely discussed since. Everyone who is interested in the topic knows that Canada (and other countries) operate with a system of fiat currency. We still choose to use this money knowing that it is fiat currency. So where is the con?

Even if you make the argument that economically it makes sense to move back to a gold standard, to call it a con there has to be some element of deception. There is no deception going on here. We all know what fiat currency is and choose to use it. If I want to do business only with gold coins I can if I want. This is not a con. (unless you have some old English/latin definition of the word that is different from it's current English definition)

If not, then What is the reason? Just making the statement proves nothing,
Click to expand...

Bills of exchange existed for hundreds of years. Well before the current system of fiat currency. Your claim that the Bills of Exchange Act was enacted because money was worthless and people had no other way of settling debts falls down on this fact alone. As with the English Bills of Exchange Act (which is from the 1880s, again well before the current system of fiat currency), the Canadian Act was made for the purposes of codifying rules relating to Bills of Exchange. It wasn't bringing any new type of financial instrument into existence as a way of dealing with the switch to a fiat currency.

especially when the one making the unsupported statement is representing the Mickey Mouse fiction world that is corporate Canada, and the corporate Crown of the City of London.
Click to expand...

I am not representing anyone else in these conversations.

Who would make or issue such a decision? A black robed priest? They are just administrative officers of the make-believe ship at sea called Canada, with their allegiance pledged to the Crown of the City of London.
Click to expand...

Yes, a judge employed by the government of Canada. You are one saying they needed to make changes to the law to allow people to sue for debts. You could have just claimed they ignore the law and are loyal to pope or something. But in this you are claiming that they were following the law but had to make some changes in response to a fiat currency. If so there must be some decision reflecting this fact, or else how did you come to the conlusion you have reached?

So, if Parliament says that Canadian currency is no longer a bill of exchange, then that means that creditors are getting truly ripped off, and currency is purely a con game.
Click to expand...

Again, it isn't a con game if there is no deception.

Everybody knows???? Since when. And, if all one gets in rexchange for their labour/time/life is this con job called fiat money, and then CRA takes it from them because CRA sees them as slaves belonging to the corporate Crown, and subject to the harvesting of the fruits of their labour, may I suggest that the fraud is all too evident.
Click to expand...

No. The current system of currency is known to everyone. Sure some people are ignorant and have never looked into it, but the information is widely available. The fact that we pay taxes is widely known as well. If the CRA secretly considers people to be like slaves they are keeping this to themselves and administering the tax system in accordance with parliament's wishes.

All the evidence and proof in the world would not change your loyalty to your primary oath to the Lawyers Guild ( The BAR) of the City of London, and thus the Pontiff's Holy Roman Empire evil dictatoprship.
Click to expand...

As I have said before, I have no loyalty to any of these groups.

If the law meant what the term is supposed to mean,
Click to expand...

This sort of thinking seems to be leading you to a lot of incorrect conclusions. A word means what it means. It is ridiculous to insert your own meaning and then say "that's what it is supposed to mean." Someone brought up the example with calling someone "gay." You can say it is supposed to mean happy and cheerful and to back up your argument you can point to a dictionary definition from 100 years ago. But that argument instantly fails as soon as someone else looks for the meaning in current sources.

If you are an 'officer of the corporate Crown', then your first loyalty is to that corporation. Follow what law? The rules made by the 'policy makers' (politicians) of the corporate Parliament of corporate Provincial legislatures? Who owns those corporate bodies. The judge in the People of Wetaskiwin v. Milton Littlechild MP certainly pointed out that, once an MP is sworn in as an officer of Parliament, they were not beholden to the people who voted for that MP.
Click to expand...

Well, I'm not an "officer of the corporate crown" but that is a reasonable accurate description of the political system. You're not using the corret words but I know what you mean.

Maybe in fact, but not in practise. I have met lawyers who were disBARred for defending someone against Crown policy.
Click to expand...

Who? I would be very interested.
 
Last edited:
EldonG said:
Now, offer some proof that 'govern' does not mean to steer, direct or administer a ship at sea, or to administer, steer, or direct a make-believe ship at sea, called an incorporated body, of which Government is a 'body politic' (policy making fictional body) - a thing that does not exist in nature.
Click to expand...

The person that steers a ship is called a Helmsman.

The person in charge of a ship is called a Captain.
 
EldonG said:
For instance, he says there is no mention of incorporated bodies being 'make believe ships at sea' in the legislation on the creation of incorporated bodies.
Click to expand...

This kind of implies that he is about to come back with some kind of response to my assertion. But instead this:

Does a nautical engineer have to explain what a ship is when he is designing and overseeing the building of a ship or vessel? If a body has bounds, boundaries, a hull or skin in which the body is contained, and has a captain (by whatever name), and 'officers' (by whatever name) and (crew) members (by whatever name), then that describes a ship at sea, or a make-believe ship at sea - an incorporated (from the Latin, 'corpus' meaning 'body'), where the word 'to incorporate means to assemble into a completed structure (body).
Click to expand...
 
Oh, has he gone? Damn, and I wanted to know what a "diety" was.
 
Sledge said:
Oh, has he gone? Damn, and I wanted to know what a "diety" was.
Click to expand...


From its etymology, it's obviously this worn inside-out:

DSC03502.jpg
 
blobru said:
From its etymology, it's obviously this worn inside-out:

http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/ee204/madebyhippies/DSC03502.jpg
Click to expand...

SanityGap said:
It's the profound feeling of sorrow felt after reducing your calorie intake and seeing no change on the scales.
Click to expand...

Nonsense. You're both wrong. It obviously means "Diet" as in a "formal deliberative assembly". In particular, the general assembly of Imperial Estates of the Holy Roman Empire.

So, when Eldon says...
Therefore, if you wish to have any help or advice in recovering your Creator Diety given rights and freedoms, find my e-mail on my website.
Click to expand...
...he plainly means the rights and freedoms allowed us by our Roman overlords in the Imperial Diet. Thus, they are our "diety" rights.

I think Eldon's red robes are showing.
 
Last edited:
Eldon's statements on "The Pope's Holy Roman Empire" get this reaction from anybody familiar with the history of the HRE in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance period:

:dl:

Let us just say the constant fighting between the Pontiff and the Emperor of the HRE made anything between Barack Obama and the GOP look mild in comparasion.
 
EldonG said:
No. I have no problem with the positive exposure and hits on my website. I just noticed that there were a number of hits on my hitcounter from JREF Forum, and wondered what was triggering the hits on my website.

Then, I find a whole bunch of the fascist crowd chiming in to supposedly 'debunk' Detax Canada and Eldon Warman.

I find that a lawyer, who uses the old lawyer technique of lying by not giving all the fact or ignoring that which does not conform to his agenda, laying out the pattern for the debunking crowd to follow. Lying by omission is just as much lying as is stating falsehoods.

For instance, he says there is no mention of incorporated bodies being 'make believe ships at sea' in the legislation on the creation of incorporated bodies.

Does a nautical engineer have to explain what a ship is when he is designing and overseeing the building of a ship or vessel? If a body has bounds, boundaries, a hull or skin in which the body is contained, and has a captain (by whatever name), and 'officers' (by whatever name) and (crew) members (by whatever name), then that describes a ship at sea, or a make-believe ship at sea - an incorporated (from the Latin, 'corpus' meaning 'body'), where the word 'to incorporate means to assemble into a completed structure (body).

So, you all can continue your Eldon Warman bashing, as you obviously will; however, it makes no difference to me or my mission to help the Canadian and American men and women return to their true God Given status as free will men, and stop the enslavement and life/time ripoff that they now suffer.

You cannot affect my interests financially, as my detax program is totally free for the asking, and always has been since I went on the internet in January of 1998.

Therefore, if you wish to have any help or advice in recovering your Creator Diety given rights and freedoms, find my e-mail on my website.

Sticks and stones may break one's bones, but names can make you a slave!

Bye Bye!
Click to expand...

Another one debunked and on the run. Why do they all run? It would be so easy to silence the entire forum and "win" the argument...if it had ANY basis in reality. All you need to do is cite 1 sustained court case from any country that says a defendant Freeloader on the Land does not have to pay taxes because of his sovereign citizen status. Thats it - you win. Why can none of the Freeloaders do this simple thing and silence us all?

Oh, because the entire thing is made up and prays on the minds of dumb people trying to escape legitimate debts.

By the way, if you google this guy its nothing but a tragic tale of him being banned/abandoning forum after forum where he finds 0 supports and to much reality to deal with.

Eldon Warman: 0
Reality: 1
 
Last edited:
Well that was highly entertaining! I thought the whole catholic papal conspiracy thing was regulated to the past, but ELDON has clearly demonstrated that is incorrect.
 
I have to say I really enjoyed it and I finally got my custom title sorted out, because of it.
 
LightinDarkness said:
Another one debunked and on the run. Why do they all run? It would be so easy to silence the entire forum and "win" the argument...if it had ANY basis in reality. All you need to do is cite 1 sustained court case from any country that says a defendant Freeloader on the Land does not have to pay taxes because of his sovereign citizen status. Thats it - you win. Why can none of the Freeloaders do this simple thing and silence us all?

Oh, because the entire thing is made up and prays on the minds of dumb people trying to escape legitimate debts.

By the way, if you google this guy its nothing but a tragic tale of him being banned/abandoning forum after forum where he finds 0 supports and to much reality to deal with.

Eldon Warman: 0
Reality: 1
Click to expand...

Nah! It is just that I find no one participating in this thread with the high intelligence of myself, and thus none worthy of my further responses.

Such purile minds bore me! However, the response from so many 'damage control goons' does suggest to me that I, and my Detax Canada website, am obviously a burr under some big shot's saddle.
 
EldonG said:
Nah! It is just that I find no one participating in this thread with the high intelligence of myself, and thus none worthy of my further responses.

Such purile minds bore me! However, the response from so many 'damage control goons' does suggest to me that I, and my Detax Canada website, am obviously a burr under some big shot's saddle.
Click to expand...



So now he goes into "Black Knight From Monty Python and The Holy Grail" mode.......
"COME BACK,AND I'LL BITE YOU TO DEATH!".
 
EldonG said:
Nah! It is just that I find no one participating in this thread with the high intelligence of myself, and thus none worthy of my further responses.

Such purile minds bore me! However, the response from so many 'damage control goons' does suggest to me that I, and my Detax Canada website, am obviously a burr under some big shot's saddle.
Click to expand...

Misplaced arrogance rocks!!!:D
Now will you be addressing your criminal convictions, anti-semitism, lying, scams et cetera?
 
catsmate1 said:
Misplaced arrogance rocks!!!:D
Now will you be addressing your criminal convictions, anti-semitism, lying, scams et cetera?
Click to expand...



I'd say self supporting delusions rock!


He knows he's on to something big, because everywhere he goes, he runs into people who tell him he's insane.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom