Detax Canada

[Ian Osborne]

It's because when you know the magic words, you get initiated into the secret cabal run by the Freemasons, the Illuminati and Mossad. President Kennedy got one of the words wrong, that's why they shot him.

 

[catsmate]

50,000,000 Europeans murdered by the Inquisition seems to represent a bit more than a claim.

Reeeeeally? Given that the best estimates of the population of Western Europe in the early/mid seventeenth century are less than eighty million people, 6-8 million of them in Spain, don't you think the extermination of ~60% of he population of the continent would have been noticed?
Perhaps you find better sources for your "facts"?

 

[D'rok]

Please correct me if I am misstating any part of your position.

1) There has been an international conspiracy to control the most powerful nations on Earth for over 300 years.

2) These conspirators are so ruthless and power-hunger that they are willing to kill tens of millions of people to achieve their goals.

3) As of 2010, they control virtually all aspects of the governments of England, the U.S. and Canada.

4) As part of their plans, they have instituted income taxes in these three countries.


OK, up to this point, you have described a scenario that may be difficult to believe, but is, at least, internally consistent.


5) These national income taxes are inherently unjust, immoral, and illegal because they violate the natural rights of citizens.

6) There is a way for citizens to avoid these taxes and all subsequent penalties by saying the right words to the right people.

7) People who have discovered these loopholes are permitted to sell (or give away) this information to as many people as they like.

Do you see how this part really looks strange? There is an international cabal willing to kill you and all your relatives at a moment's notice if they think you are a threat, but if you say the magic words (and successfully saying the magic words proves that there is a conspiracy), then you are immune from harm. Why would they allow such an exemption?!

Evil empires always have an overlooked exhaust port that plucky rebels can use to destroy the system. It's in the script.

 

[EldonG]

Communism was a Jesuit Conspriacy???????????

Congratulations. You just got a Stundie Nomination after just 17 posts with that one.

Didn't say that Communism was a Jesuit conspiracy. I say that Communism arises out of the fascist/corporatist structure of the Holy Roman Empire.

Just search 'fasces' and you will see that the 'fasces' symbol is that of Rome, and is used in every western country as a symbol in the insignia.

 

[EldonG]

And most of the world could care less about your eurocentric fantasy... There's a big world outside your little delusional bubble, and many other cultures outside of Europe you know. All this nonsense and crap that you regurgitate from kook websites, is not the basis of the entire planet.

If you say so, it must be a fact. However, you offer no proof of or with your statement.

 

[EldonG]

Isn't it funny how so many of these kooks make the accusation of people being "agents" and it somehow doesn't even occur to them that such statements definitely make them look even more like crackpots that are paranoid and delusional...

I suppose you would like people you believe that; however, Queen Victoria removed the succession rights of British Monarchy as the Monarchs of Canada from the BNA Act in 1893, and yet we still have Queen Elizabeth II representing herself as Queen of Canada and other former colonies. That can only be as agent Monarch under the authority of the Crown of the City of Londonm which is the over-corporation of the Crown of GB. That arises out of the King John/Pope Innocent III treaty making England and its Monarchs vassals of the Pontiff's HRE and the Crown of GB incorporated in 1297 as a sub-corporation of the Crown of the Pontiff owned City of London. The Queen of GB has to down dress and ask permission to enter the City of London.

"crackpots that are paranoid and delusional" is a common 'ad hominum' term used to kill the messenger, and sideline the message of the messenger.

 

[Fitter]

<snip>

"crackpots that are paranoid and delusional" is a common 'ad hominum' term used to kill the messenger, and sideline the message of the messenger.

Possibly. Of course it might also be used to point out that crackpots are paranoid and delusional.

 

[EldonG]

Indeed. But I admit I'm curious to know what on earth a "Government of Jesuit controlled dupes" is supposed to be.

The Jesuit order was created around 1540 as the goon squad of the Pontiff, and controls textbook content, education curricula, colleges of higher education (heavy into the socialist agenda) and indoctrination of government leaders, as was PMs St Laurent, Trudeau, Mulroney, and Martin
all were products of Jesuit education and indoctrination. All promoted the
New World Order plans of the Pontiff of Rome. All were of the socialist/liberal bent, regardless the name of the party they served.

 

[EldonG]

And most of the world could care less about your eurocentric fantasy... There's a big world outside your little delusional bubble, and many other cultures outside of Europe you know. All this nonsense and crap that you regurgitate from kook websites, is not the basis of the entire planet.

Your liberal/socialist opinion, I presume - but certainly not the opinion of a lot of Canadians and Americans.

 

[EldonG]

I love the "I'll only pay for what benefits me directly. ("...and exclusively" being implied in that as well.) I have a paved road in front of my house. If it wasn't there it would be "fun" getting in and out in the spring rains. Trucks use it, fire companies use it, school buses use it, ambulances uses, that moron with the kill-level stereo system uses it. Maybe I should pay only for the bits I use?

You stick to the liberal/socialist concepts and propaganda by the 'fruits of the labour of owned slaves' CRA propaganda, but your views are totally refuted by the speech given by the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of NYC in 1946.

 

[D'rok]

The Jesuit order was created around 1540 as the goon squad of the Pontiff, and controls textbook content, education curricula, colleges of higher education (heavy into the socialist agenda) and indoctrination of government leaders, as was PMs St Laurent, Trudeau, Mulroney, and Martin
all were products of Jesuit education and indoctrination. All promoted the
New World Order plans of the Pontiff of Rome. All were of the socialist/liberal bent, regardless the name of the party they served.

Damn that Mulroney and his socialist Free Trade Agreement. The Jesuits must have got to him! Maybe Karhleinz Schreiber was a Jesuit?

 

[blobru]

Well, I am glad my website is serving two good purposes - teaching Canadians and Americans how to get out from under the Pope imposed involuntary servitude (slave) status, and creating some humour for those who have had their heads removed by the guillotine.

Well, that's one way to avoid a head tax. (ba-dump-bump?)

(Deserved that. Thx for the heads up.)

 

[EldonG]

Does that mean he'll only pay for roads that benefit him directly? If so, where does he draw the line? Are roads he doesn't drive on but the guy delivering his television does something he'll pay for? What about a road being driven on by someone taking food to the supermarket he buys it from? I can't help but think that such an approach would involve so much time crunching numbers he'd be better off just paying road tax and having done with it.

You obviously haven't read the speech by Beardsley Ruml, the chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of NYC , given to the NYC Chamber of Commerce in 1946? Go to the link given by OP and search 'fair share'. That webpage and the linked webpage are from an American who had his website shut down under trumped up charges of 'mail fraud' for selling some product or other on his website. That is a common tool in the USA to shut down undesirable (to Government) websites. They base it upon some shill claiming that he or she didn't get the product ordered.

Income tax does NOT collect 'money'. True money is an asset backed medium. There has been no money since the early 1930s. What they collect/harvest is the 'fruits of the labour of owned slaves'.

All currency is created out of nothing based upon the credit signature of a borrower of money. The banks just convert one form of credit, a promissory note, into another form of promissory note, the currency of the corporate nation. When you get a loan or a mortgage at a bank, you give them a promissory note. They deposit that as a bank asset, and then lend the money you created back to you at interest and demand for full payback of
your own money to the bank, and also take the property purchased with your own created money as pledged chattel for re-payment. The bank has loaned you NOTHING. They have absolutely no liability or danger of loss.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

You stick to the liberal/socialist concepts and propaganda by the 'fruits of the labour of owned slaves' CRA propaganda, but your views are totally refuted by the speech given by the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of NYC in 1946.

Was he dancing around a pentagram drawn with the blood of a hanged man while shaking a rattle made from the funny bones of a coyote?

 

[D'rok]

Queen Victoria removed the succession rights of British Monarchy as the Monarchs of Canada from the BNA Act in 1893

Um, what?

Declaration of Executive Power in the Queen 9. The Executive Government and Authority of and over Canada is hereby declared to continue and be vested in the Queen.

http://canlii.org/en/ca/const/const1867.html#executive

Looks like it's still there to me.

 

[EldonG]

I'm lost on this detax thing.If we don't pay for the infrastructure, who will?

The same as is paying it now - nobody. Nothing is being 'paid for'. The whole fiat money thing is just one big CON game.

What does it take to have you realize that 10 Billion NOTHINGS is equal to 1 NOTHING.

The problem that we, the people have is that we accept the 'NOTHINGS' as an equal exchange for our labour or risk (investment). An analogy would be the flimsy plastic bags one gets in which to put fruits and vegetables at the supermarket. They have the name (Safeway) on those bags, just as Canadian or Federal Reserve Notes have the Queen's picture or some dead President.

Supposing we take our selection through checkout and proceed to the parking lot with our purchase. Supposing that Safeway security intercepts us and demands 1/2 of the flimsy plastic bags be given back, as they have Safeway's name on them. Well, that is what CRA (or the IRS) does to
Canadians or Americans by demanding a large portion of the funny money back in April of each year.

And, if it isn't a slave thing, as you insinuate, then why doesn't CRA obey the edict of Queen Victoria made in about 1870 that said "No man's wages will be attached (confiscated)".

The public General Statues
passed in the THIRTY-THIRD AND THIRTY-FOURTH YEARS in the reign of
QUEEEN VICTORIA 1870

An Act to abolish Attachment of Wages: {14th July 1870}
Whereas by an order in Council made on the eighteenth day of November one thousand and sixty-seven, certain of the provisions of "The Common Law Procedure Act, 1854" were extended and applied to all the Courts of Record established under the provisions of "The County Courts Act 1846" and also to the City of London Courts of Record as constituted by "The County Courts Act 1867"

And whereas much inconvenience has arisen by the attachment of wages to satisfy judgements recovered in some of such first-mentioned Courts, and it is expedient to prevent the attachment of wages to satisfy judgements recovered in any Court of Record or inferior Court:

Be it enacted by the Queen's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present parlaiment assembled, and by the authority of the same:
1. That after the passing of this Act no order for the attachment of the wages of any servant, labourer, or workman shall be made by the judge of any Court of Record or inferior 2. That this Act may be cited as "The Wages Attachment Abolition Act, 1870."

This Act has not been rescinded that I know of.

 

[Horatius]

.... as was PMs St Laurent, Trudeau, Mulroney, and Martin

 

[EldonG]

There you go again. Citing case law while forgetting how easy it us to look up the cases you cite, especially for those of us who have some training in the area. Strangely, those cases don't say what you claim. You seem to have missed the last time you were called on this. Here it is again for your attention:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6275693#post6275693

Let's see of you did any better this time. Here is the case:

http://csc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1977/1978scr1-1148/1978scr1-1148.html

Now, did the SC rule that Canadian bills are "only promissory notes"? No. In a 5-4 split decision in which the Chief Justice dissented, the Court found that Canadian bills were legal tender but also promissory notes.

Is that still the case? Subtracting the crazy, you give a partial answer:

The ship garbage is exactly that. But, as you note, the ambiguity that caused the original decision has now been addressed. Our bills no longer say that "The Bank of Canada will pay the bearer on demand". Canadian bills now no longer have a dual identity as legal tender and promissory notes. They are now legal tender and legal tender only. Our currency is the Canadian dollar.

But I suppose the Pope made me say that.

So? What did you say? Canadian money is a form of promissory note?

I said that. That is the only point I intended to make. I believe I already pointed out that, since the late 1970s, the Canadian currency didn't promise to pay anything, as a specie of ship script wouldn't have to promise to pay anything if it were never going to reach home port. That doesn't change the nature of 'currency, except it takes a leap within the confidence game they play.

What is your proof that a corporate body is NOT a make believe ship at sea.

I was an airline (ship) captain, so I am quite capable of analyzing the basics of both and making the comparison. What are your qualifications?

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

The same as is paying it now - nobody. Nothing is being 'paid for'. The whole fiat money thing is just one big CON game.

What does it take to have you realize that 10 Billion NOTHINGS is equal to 1 NOTHING.

I see you avoided answering my post about arbitrary value. Kinda sticks a pin in your whole tirade.

 

[D'rok]

So? What did you say? Canadian money is a form of promissory note?

Incorrect. Read again.

I said that. That is the only point I intended to make. I believe I already pointed out that, since the late 1970s, the Canadian currency didn't promise to pay anything, as a specie of ship script wouldn't have to promise to pay anything if it were never going to reach home port. That doesn't change the nature of 'currency, except it takes a leap within the confidence game they play.

If it has no value, I'll take yours off your hands. PM me and we'll work out a transfer.

What is your proof that a corporate body is NOT a make believe ship at sea.

What is your proof that the invisible pink unicorn in my garage is NOT named Dave?

I was an airline (ship) captain, so I am quite capable of analyzing the basics of both and making the comparison. What are your qualifications?

I can speak several syllables while belching.