Detax Canada

[Zep]

Ah, no, Eldon. Post your evidence here. We will wait.

 

[D'rok]

Go to the detaxcanada website linked by OP, and use the search feature. Search: fairshare, and from there, follow the link to Ruml. You might find this extremely interesting.

Corsair 115 asked if you use the Canadian health care system.

Do you use the Canadian health care system?

 

[lopeyschools]

[3]** ** ** ** ** In his respondent record, Mr. Stanchfield included two affidavits. The first is entitled “Affidavit of Cory Stanchfield (the Respondent)” while the second one is entitled “Affidavit of Cory Stanchfield, in his capacity as a natural person (the Witness)”. In that second affidavit, the affiant states: “Given our similar names, the same date of birth of March 17, 1971; signature, and mailing address. It is my intent to clarify this confusion as to the true ownership of any property and/or activities that are mistakenly assumed to be the Respondent’s.” Also, at paragraph 7 of the said affidavit, the affiant indicates that when the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) agents came to his residence to serve the respondent, “I answered the door and advised them
that I was not the person they were
looking for. And at both times, documents were dropped before me or were thrown into my private residence before agents walked away. In both
instances, I forwarded these legal documents to the Respondent” (emphasis added). *At the direction of
the Court, the signatories of each affidavit were to be present at the hearing. It quickly became apparent that there was only one human being involved and that Cory Stanchfield who appeared
and argued the case before me had signed both affidavits himself.

These reads like a Monty python sketch! I couldn't stop laughing!

 

[D'rok]

These reads like a Monty python sketch! I couldn't stop laughing!

Welcome to the weird and wacky world of tax deniers, sovereign citizens, and freemen-on-the-land. 'Tis a silly place.

 

[EldonG]

Ah, no, Eldon. Post your evidence here. We will wait.

Excerpt from " /fairshare " on the DetaxCanada website linked by OP:

In 1946, Beardsley Ruml - then Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of NYC, told the truth in a speech titled "Taxes For Revenue Are Obsolete".

Mr. Ruml explained that, since a government can easily print all the paper money it needs, in any amount, and therefore does not need to tax anyone, an income tax is maintained to siphon excess paper out of circulation, to stabilize the purchasing power of paper money (i.e., regulate inflation) and prevent the hyperinflation that would ordinarily result from printing too much paper!Now you know the truth behind the 'income tax'. Yet, not one American in a million heard Mr. Ruml's speech (And that is a good thing or they might have marched on Washington!).

Ample paper must continuously be taxed (siphoned) out of circulation to keep pace with the interest payments on the national debt, being made to the mostly foreign bankers who designed and control the Federal Reserve System.

In 1982, the prestigious, private-sector Grace Commission, in their cost-cutting report to President Reagan, confirmed the ineptness of the income tax to control inflation. The following quote by the Commission confirms that they do not even understand how the income tax functions, and that the present rate of taxation does not pay the interest for the use of the money printed by the Federal Reserve Bank and thus cannot even begin to affect the growth of the national debt... "100% [of income taxes] collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt ... all income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from the government."

(This position has no semblance of reality with the position of the Federal Reserve Bank. Anyone care to guess why? )

Shocked? You should be! The Commission's report was apparently written to make certain that most hard-working Americans will never know, or even believe, the hidden connection between fraudulent paper money and the taxes they pay on their own labor (fraudulently seized from their paychecks and bank accounts by the Federal Reserve Bank's "strong arm" collection agency, the IRS).

 

[D'rok]

Excerpt from " /fairshare " on the DetaxCanada website linked by OP:

In 1946, Beardsley Ruml - then Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of NYC, told the truth in a speech titled "Taxes For Revenue Are Obsolete".

Mr. Ruml explained that, since a government can easily print all the paper money it needs, in any amount, and therefore does not need to tax anyone, an income tax is maintained to siphon excess paper out of circulation, to stabilize the purchasing power of paper money (i.e., regulate inflation) and prevent the hyperinflation that would ordinarily result from printing too much paper!Now you know the truth behind the 'income tax'. Yet, not one American in a million heard Mr. Ruml's speech (And that is a good thing or they might have marched on Washington!).

Ample paper must continuously be taxed (siphoned) out of circulation to keep pace with the interest payments on the national debt, being made to the mostly foreign bankers who designed and control the Federal Reserve System.

In 1982, the prestigious, private-sector Grace Commission, in their cost-cutting report to President Reagan, confirmed the ineptness of the income tax to control inflation. The following quote by the Commission confirms that they do not even understand how the income tax functions, and that the present rate of taxation does not pay the interest for the use of the money printed by the Federal Reserve Bank and thus cannot even begin to affect the growth of the national debt... "100% [of income taxes] collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt ... all income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from the government."

(This position has no semblance of reality with the position of the Federal Reserve Bank. Anyone care to guess why? )

Shocked? You should be! The Commission's report was apparently written to make certain that most hard-working Americans will never know, or even believe, the hidden connection between fraudulent paper money and the taxes they pay on their own labor (fraudulently seized from their paychecks and bank accounts by the Federal Reserve Bank's "strong arm" collection agency, the IRS).

Relevance of conspiracy nonsense about the American Federal Reserve to Canada and the Canadian health care system?

None.

Try again.

 

[The Platypus]

Relevance of conspiracy nonsense about the American Federal Reserve to Canada and the Canadian health care system?

None.

Try again.

That's what i was gonna say. Good question, what does that have to do with Canada, EldonG?

 

[EldonG]

Welcome to the weird and wacky world of tax deniers, sovereign citizens, and freemen-on-the-land. 'Tis a silly place.

Detax Canada does not promote or support any of those which you mention.

1. Income tax is only applicable to a fictional legal name created by Government by changing the family name to a 'sur' or primary name. It is not applicable to a living adult man, unless that man has , with full knowledge of terms, voluntarily entered into a contract of servitude to be an accessory attached to the Crown or State owned (intellectual property) name.

2. Any 'citizen', using the Roman source definition, is a 'subject/slave of the State. As with 'natural person', the adjective preceding the term does not
change the status of the entity.

3. The term 'freeman' is synonomous with the terms 'citizen, subject, person'; all meaning that the intended subject man to whom it is applied is of slave status. The original Magna Carta of 1215, which was voided by the Pope, the overlord of England, contained the term 'liber homo' (2 separate words meaning free man, or free will man) when claiming the rights to due process of law for a living man. The Pope could have none of this in his fascist world.

 

[EldonG]

That's what i was gonna say. Good question, what does that have to do with Canada, EldonG?

Everything. The Bank of Canada voting shares were sold to the Federal Reserve Bank of NYC in 1936. An equal number of non-voting shares were then created and sold back to the Canadian Government. All major banks in Canada have a representatibe of the Federal Reserve on their board of directors.

The corporate business office of the corporation called Canada is in Washington, DC.
Look it up on Dunn and Bradstreet.

Both the IRS and Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) operate under the International Monetary Fund, which is directly owned (behind veils) by the Pontiff of Rome.

CRA operates above and outside Canadian law as proven by the fact that CRA can confiscate Canadian OAS, CPP and military pension when all three of the statutes covering those say 'no attachments of benefits in law or in equity'. Operating under the property right based feudal system 'master/servant law', CRA edicts and demands trump statutory law.

 

[EldonG]

These reads like a Monty python sketch! I couldn't stop laughing!

This had nothing to do with the Detax Canada program. The human defendant 'identified' himself as an accessory attached to Crown property (the legal name), and that allowed the judge to apply the legal maxim: accessio cedit principali'.

With that, the judge applied the Roman treatment upon disobedient slaves
that is was succinctly stated in the Fugitive Slave Act (USA) of 1850, section 6: "In no trial or hearing under this act shall the testimony of such alleged fugitive be admitted in evidence;"

 

[D'rok]

Detax Canada does not promote or support any of those which you mention.

You deny the validity of income tax. You advocate individual sovereignty over parliamentary sovereignty. You advocate separating the natural person from the legal person.

That's three for three. I guess you lied.

1. Income tax is only applicable to a fictional legal name created by Government by changing the family name to a 'sur' or primary name. It is not applicable to a living adult man, unless that man has , with full knowledge of terms, voluntarily entered into a contract of servitude to be an accessory attached to the Crown or State owned (intellectual property) name.

No. Authoritative cases have already been cited in this very thread that show the idiotic untruth of your legal "analysis".

2. Any 'citizen', using the Roman source definition, is a 'subject/slave of the State. As with 'natural person', the adjective preceding the term does not
change the status of the entity.

Roman law is irrelevant to Canada. The Roman definition of citizen, whatever it may be, is irrelevant to Canada. All natural persons are also legal persons.

3. The term 'freeman' is synonomous with the terms 'citizen, subject, person'; all meaning that the intended subject man to whom it is applied is of slave status. The original Magna Carta of 1215, which was voided by the Pope, the overlord of England, contained the term 'liber homo' (2 separate words meaning free man, or free will man) when claiming the rights to due process of law for a living man. The Pope could have none of this in his fascist world.

The Pope is irrelevant to Canada. The Pope has no say in Canadian law. The Magna Carta, whatever version, is of historical significance only. The only slavery in Canada is of the type that you embody - i.e., hopeless bondage to fear, anger and delusion. You are a slave of your own making.

 

[D'rok]

This had nothing to do with the Detax Canada program. The human defendant 'identified' himself as an accessory attached to Crown property (the legal name), and that allowed the judge to apply the legal maxim: accessio cedit principali'.

With that, the judge applied the Roman treatment upon disobedient slaves
that is was succinctly stated in the Fugitive Slave Act (USA) of 1850, section 6: "In no trial or hearing under this act shall the testimony of such alleged fugitive be admitted in evidence;"

Canadian judges don't apply Roman law. Canadian judges don't apply American law, especially American law that is no longer good law even in America.

We can read. We can read that case. We can see how well your doctrine of the natural/legal person distinction holds up to legal scrutiny. It doesn't.

 

[Alareth]

Both the IRS and Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) operate under the International Monetary Fund, which is directly owned (behind veils) by the Pontiff of Rome.

Oh I just can't WAIT to see your evidence for this one.

 

[The Platypus]

Everything. The Bank of Canada voting shares were sold to the Federal Reserve Bank of NYC in 1936. An equal number of non-voting shares were then created and sold back to the Canadian Government. All major banks in Canada have a representatibe of the Federal Reserve on their board of directors.

The corporate business office of the corporation called Canada is in Washington, DC.
Look it up on Dunn and Bradstreet.

Both the IRS and Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) operate under the International Monetary Fund, which is directly owned (behind veils) by the Pontiff of Rome.

CRA operates above and outside Canadian law as proven by the fact that CRA can confiscate Canadian OAS, CPP and military pension when all three of the statutes covering those say 'no attachments of benefits in law or in equity'. Operating under the property right based feudal system 'master/servant law', CRA edicts and demands trump statutory law.

Gee that's interesting, i'm admittedly no expert in this, so i have to look such things up to verify them. And upon looking this all up, none of what your saying seems to be true... go figure, I wonder why?

 

[dtugg]

 

[EldonG]

You deny the validity of income tax. You advocate individual sovereignty over parliamentary sovereignty. You advocate separating the natural person from the legal person.

That's three for three. I guess you lied..

Wrong. I don't advocate 'sovereignty. I advocate 'free will status'. The only separation I show for natural and artificial/legal person is that natural means a man in servitude to the corporate Crown, and an artificial person being a ship or make believe ship - an incorporated body.

No. Authoritative cases have already been cited in this very thread that show the idiotic untruth of your legal "analysis"..

There is, and cannot be authorative case law for dismissed cases for want of jurisdiction over a free will man.

Roman law is irrelevant to Canada. The Roman definition of citizen, whatever it may be, is irrelevant to Canada. All natural persons are also legal persons..

Canada, as a corporate body is a Province of the Holy Roman Empire of the Pontiff of Rome/Vatican. Incorporation of bodies politic (policy enforcing corporate bodies) is totally a Roman Empire thing, as is statutory law that is applicable to corporate members called 'persons' - slave crewmembers on the make-believe ship at sea.

The Pope is irrelevant to Canada. The Pope has no say in Canadian law. The Magna Carta, whatever version, is of historical significance only. The only slavery in Canada is of the type that you embody - i.e., hopeless bondage to fear, anger and delusion. You are a slave of your own making.

Is that so? The Popes of 1455 and 1493 declared by Papal Bull that all European discovered lands belonged to the Pontiff of Rome. The Papal Bull of 1302 declared all humankind as being 'subjects of (slaves of) the Pontiff of Rome. (look up on GOOGLE). The Protestant separation of King Henry VII's
time only separated the sub-corporate body, the Roman Catholic Church, but did not nullify the treaty between King John and Pope Innocent III of 1213,
which declared England and the Monarch of England vassals FOREVER of the Holy Roman Empire.

When a new Pope is Crowned as King of Heaven, of Earth and of Hell, this declaration is made: "Receive the tiara adorned with three crowns and know that thou art Father of princes and kings, Ruler of the world, Vicar of our Savior Jesus Christ".

Do you think that the Pope exercises secular 'Ruler of the World' by sprinkling holy water?

 

[EldonG]

Gee that's interesting, i'm admittedly no expert in this, so i have to look such things up to verify them. And upon looking this all up, none of what your saying seems to be true... go figure, I wonder why?

Where are you looking? You cannot find such information by looking at the roll of toilet paper by your can.

Is this a thread by Government of Jesuit controlled dupes and dis-information agents?

 

[EldonG]

How did you know friday night was my night off from watching children explode?

The Pope lost the majority of his power in a little event known as the Protestant reformation. It has been almost entirely downhill for that "mouthpeice of god" since. The idea that the pope is controlling the IMF is not grounded in reality.

The Declaration made of the powers of the Pope: "Receive the tiara adorned with three crowns and know that thou art Father of princes and kings, Ruler of the world, Vicar of our Savior Jesus Christ". - Shows both a secular and a religious role for the Pope. He is creator of Kings and Princes, Ruler of the World in the secular (worldly) role, and God incarnate on Earth as his religious role.

The making of England - later Great Britain (in 1213) - as a vassal state of the Holy Roman Empire FOREVER (a secular Empire, not religious/ecclestical) was a secular tie. The English protestant move was just a separation of the sub-corporate Anglican Church from the sub-corporae Roman Catholic Church.

"None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." Goethe

"None are so blind as those who will not see."

 

[EldonG]

Oh I just can't WAIT to see your evidence for this one.

Who Owns You?

1. The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)

2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816)

3. The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)

4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg.113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)

Snipped for compliance with Rule 4. Please do not post lengthy cut and pasted tracts available elsewhere. Instead, just post a short quote and a link to the complete tract. Also, please consult the Membership Agreement, to which you agreed upon becoming a member of the forum.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL

 

[lopeyschools]

The Declaration made of the powers of the Pope: "Receive the tiara adorned with three crowns and know that thou art Father of princes and kings, Ruler of the world, Vicar of our Savior Jesus Christ". - Shows both a secular and a religious role for the Pope. He is creator of Kings and Princes, Ruler of the World in the secular (worldly) role, and God incarnate on Earth as his religious role.

The making of England - later Great Britain (in 1213) - as a vassal state of the Holy Roman Empire FOREVER (a secular Empire, not religious/ecclestical) was a secular tie. The English protestant move was just a separation of the sub-corporate Anglican Church from the sub-corporae Roman Catholic Church.

"None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." Goethe

"None are so blind as those who will not see."

ok,

1. Saying you're the leader of the world, and being the leader of the world are two entirely separate things. The Pop has not held any real power for a very long time. The historical enemies of the papacy made sure of this.

2. English Protestantism was a full blown separation of the churches. Catholics were hunted and burned for being catholic.

I hate to sound arrogant but your knowledge of history is seriously flawed. Take some history courses at an accredited university.