Horatius
NWO Kitty Wrangler
- Joined
- May 9, 2006
- Messages
- 29,691
No, no no...
You don't understand.
I'm you.
Or are you me?
Maybe we're both Hans?
I'm a bit confused...maybe I should log out and log back in again.
![]()
It's simple, really....
No, no no...
You don't understand.
I'm you.
Or are you me?
Maybe we're both Hans?
I'm a bit confused...maybe I should log out and log back in again.
![]()
.No, no no...
You don't understand.
I'm you.
Or are you me?
Maybe we're both Hans?
I'm a bit confused...maybe I should log out and log back in again.
![]()
Must be. Muslim, communist, progressive or bankster don't rhymeor is that Jew....
.
Well you are AustralianBother! My cutting riposte is wasted, as Eldon has left the building. After all, I am Australian and yes, our provinces *did* vote to adopt the Constitution that formed Australia.
I also love the way he answered my question with an answer to another question entirely. I guess that means I stay deluded and sheepled forevermore...
I like how some of the FOTLers manage to see right through him:I like his obssession with the Pope controlling everything since the 13th century to the point of actually owning Britain and America.
Crazy Serb said:As in, you're not the first one (and won't be the last one) to think you've found the Holy Grail of some sort in some ancient scriptures and laws written thousands of years ago that somehow apply today as well.
He said, she said 800 years ago, he did this and that 500 years ago and all... sorry to break it down to you, but none of that applies in modern society. You can't even use the Bible to make an argument of any sort (convincing), as half the people you try to argue with will look at you like you're a loony, following a book written by God knows who with who knows what intentions and perverted and re-written over the last 2,000 years so many times by people who had their own hidden agendas, that the best you can use it for is to start a camp fire...
As far as any believable arguments and points you want to make, again, just try to stay focused here and stop drifting all over the place, and I'm sure me and a few others here might start siding with you.
However, when you bring in ancient Kings, Popes, fictional entities, strawman, slaves, artificial persons, Canada as a hoax, etc, etc. you'll lose most people... Hell, even those who you semi-convert and convince that some of that is true, most of them would never bother using it as an argument in a court of law, in front of a jury of their peers or in public in general. Why? Because it's way too far fetched and based on assumptions that haven't been proven (most of the time) or have been proven wrong by Superior Courts of this country already.
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?p=58863#p58863
Maybe we're both Hans?
I'm a bit confused...maybe I should log out and log back in again.
Wow, this was the most fun I've had reading a thread in a long time, and I didn't even find it in time to join in!
I want to thank everyone who made it possible, even if it was just one person on 20 different accounts.
I am the Egg Man. They are the Egg Men. I am the Walrus.