Andy_Ross
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2010
- Messages
- 67,475
1302 with the Papal Edict (Papal Bull) Unam Sanctam
You seem to think this renders any other law, treaty, decleration and constitution invalid.
What is so special about this that it renders (for example) the US Constitution invalid?
What about the fact that later English Monarchs and Parlaiments passed laws and declerations removing any power from the Vatican in Britain?
If these later acts, laws etc are invalid why are they? what gives this Papal Edict any special power over later laws etc? Magic?
What if I find an earlier legal document or law, would that have any power over this later Papal Edict? The Kingdoms of Northumbria and East Anglia, and the lands of the Five Boroughs of Leicester, Nottingham, Derby, Stamford and Lincoln were all subject to Danelaw, signed by Alfred the GReat. WHy is that any less lawful than a later 'Edict' from the Pope? What about Mercian and Saxon Law? WHat makes them invalid but your 'Edict' still valid?
You seem to think this renders any other law, treaty, decleration and constitution invalid.
What is so special about this that it renders (for example) the US Constitution invalid?
What about the fact that later English Monarchs and Parlaiments passed laws and declerations removing any power from the Vatican in Britain?
If these later acts, laws etc are invalid why are they? what gives this Papal Edict any special power over later laws etc? Magic?
What if I find an earlier legal document or law, would that have any power over this later Papal Edict? The Kingdoms of Northumbria and East Anglia, and the lands of the Five Boroughs of Leicester, Nottingham, Derby, Stamford and Lincoln were all subject to Danelaw, signed by Alfred the GReat. WHy is that any less lawful than a later 'Edict' from the Pope? What about Mercian and Saxon Law? WHat makes them invalid but your 'Edict' still valid?

