TheSapient
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2011
- Messages
- 415
AND the Younger Dryas was a recent discovery...so named.
Plato would not have referred to it as such.
Ummm... No.
We knew about Plato many many many years ago. As you can see in this thread, many believe the tale to be myth. Because no such sinking occurred, globally or locally.
I've posted photographs of sunken ruins, and the recent discovery of this Younger Dryas period coincides with Plato's date.
How many more facts must be verified before Plato escapes your mythical massaging?
What is your argument exactly? That Plato didn't properly predict the name the discovery was to be called?
I don't understand what it is you are arguing...
Well of COURSE he was not going to refer to the time period by "Younger Dryas". But your argument is that he had the right "date" for it. I'm asking you to connect the date of Atlantis to the Younger Drayas in Plato's writing. The Younger Dryas was characterized by cooling see level changes over centuries. The fall of Atlantis in the story was characterized by volcanoes and rapid flooding.
I've no idea where you got the idea that anyone doubts Plato was a real person.
Yes, I've seen you claim that relatively recent ruins in the Mediterranean are proof a continent sunk in the Atlantic 9000 years before Plato. I've seen you claiming that Jews worship menorahs but don't know how many arms they have. I've read the whole thread. I've seen how you refuse to answer questions. How you constantly contradict yourself. I've seen how you put people on ignore for making you feel insecure with their greater knowledge. I love the thread. It is very entertaining.