phiwum
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2010
- Messages
- 13,590
Why are you on and on about this? That woman's word seems to be good enough for everyone on every other point. Why not this one?
You seem to have ignored my post. She said they were given the paperwork before the flight. You seem to think that this means immediately before the flight, but as I pointed out, the DHS says such paperwork is given to migrants during their initial processing.
Maybe she actually thought it was right before the flight, or maybe she was just saying that it was some time before the flight (which is true). In any case, we have pretty good evidence that it was at the time of their arrival in the US, so there's no need to insist otherwise.
I already said her spew shouldn't be considered as fact, pages ago. And you will notice that I said it "seems" DHS was present based on her "testimony". It's no skin off my rear, either way. But the way she tells it, that was the case.
Again, no, there is ambiguity in the statement, “Before they boarded the planes, the migrants were processed by agents of the Department of Homeland Security who listed falsified addresses on the migrants’ paperwork.” I'll agree that in context, it's natural to suppose she meant that it was right before the flight, but she did not explicitly say so and hence there's no reason to cling to this supposition in the face of contrary evidence.
Remember, I am OK with the actions of DeSantis.
Sure. Because why not lie to a bunch of migrants, risking their court appointments and moving them to an island, if you can score political points? It really does seem win/win, doesn't it?
