• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Dems to thank O'Donnell for gift wrapping senate seat.

Spindrift

Time Person of the Year, 2006
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
19,246
Location
Right here!
Of course, if the Tea Baggers lose, it will further fuel their bigotry and paranoia; i.e. the lib-ruls snuck in illegal "Mex-i-canos" and n-----s to stuff the ballot boxes!

Because there is no way that America's Reich-Wing could ever be defeated without fraud, right? :rolleyes:
 
BINGO!

I could have also won if you'd used "Repugnicans" or mentioned Rush Limbaugh. But my card had "Tea Baggers", "bigotry", "paranoia", and the rare "reich wing" on it too, so where's my prize?

Oooh, is it increased taxes and a nanny state that outlaws smoking in my own home? Ohpleaseohpleaseohplease!
 
I could have also won if you'd used "Repugnicans" or mentioned Rush Limbaugh. But my card had "Tea Baggers", "bigotry", "paranoia", and the rare "reich wing" on it too, so where's my prize?


I don't know, but may I suggest you keep it in the same place you get your political opinions?

Oooh, is it increased taxes and a nanny state that outlaws smoking in my own home? Ohpleaseohpleaseohplease!

Better a "nanny state" where people are taken care of than a "thrown-to-the-wolves state." I'll take my chances with the "socialists" rather than the certainty of being screwed over by the corporists, warmongers, and theocrats on you side of the spectrum.
 
Stupid is as stupid does. F. Gump.

You can't fix stupid. Ron White.

The war against Stupid ... DR

Sorry, we ain't winning.

DR
 
You know, Christine O'Donnell was behind in the polls in the Republican primary as well.

Just sayin.
 
Honestly, folks thinking that clips of her talking about dabbling in 'witchcraft' are going to sink her are suffering confirmation bias. She's got plenty about her that's easily criticized, but her silly statements on Maher's show aren't worth anything politically (and could backfire).

O'Donnell is a True Believer, and I'm fairly certain it's that plus her boilerplate "Constitution... patriot... too much government" mantras are pretty much the only things that draw her supporters to her, but honestly I think she should be the TP spokesmodel instead of Palin. Palin is vindictive, bitter, and hypocritical. O'Donnell has been downright pleasant by comparison, doesn't seem to speak with this constant bitter tone underneath (though she does seem to something going on that's off-kilter), and while she apparently has had a few instances of exaggerating her CV she really does seem like she's trying really hard to be that icon of Ayn Rand, Barry Goldwater, Milton Friedman conservatism that appears to be at the heart of the Tea Party talking points (at least when folks are trying to justify the TP platform of "I AM ANGRY AT THE GOVERNMENT"). I ain't saying that she'd be effective for the Tea Party, but she'd be a lot more accurate a representation for them than their hundred-thousand-dollar-a-speaking-engagement, high-maintenance wink machine currently is for them.
 
Her incredible idiocy is the exception rather than the rule. The article almost wistfully suggests it could rub off on other Tea Party candidates. :rolleyes:
 
Her incredible idiocy is the exception rather than the rule. :rolleyes:
That would have been true a few years ago -- before McCain released the Cracken. Now, there's so much stupid/crazy in the air that it's mind boggling.
 
Her incredible idiocy is the exception rather than the rule.
I don't know, would there even be an O'Donnell without Palin to blaze the trail?
That would have been true a few years ago -- before McCain released the Cracken. Now, there's so much stupid/crazy in the air that it's mind boggling.
While I wasn't one of them, I saw many comments from people thinking Palin was well overdrawn on her 15 minutes and would whither after the election. Far from it, she has become the mold for "straight talken" folksy idiots running for office.
 
Honestly, folks thinking that clips of her talking about dabbling in 'witchcraft' are going to sink her are suffering confirmation bias. She's got plenty about her that's easily criticized, but her silly statements on Maher's show aren't worth anything politically (and could backfire).
Thing is, there's also plenty of other issues to point to, starting with her ethics:
She lies on her resume.
She uses campaign donations for personal use.
She's never, as far as I can tell, had a real job.
She claims to be a pro-life Christian, but she hates people with HIV/AIDS and doesn't want the government to save them from dying (my own biggest issue with her).
 
You know, Christine O'Donnell was behind in the polls in the Republican primary as well.

Just sayin.
Yep. Then Sarah Palin came to her rescue, convincing a lot of the Republican Right that O'Donnell was their Joan of Arc. Even if those RR's stay convinced, who's she going to convince this time?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom