Damien Evans
Up The Irons
So now you're going to give a few examples of the 'good' people in this officially terrorist organisation...
...or maybe you're not.
Ah yes, 99% of the population are terrorists. Seems likely.
So now you're going to give a few examples of the 'good' people in this officially terrorist organisation...
...or maybe you're not.
There are no good Antifa, just like there are no good Nazis (apart from dead ones, in both cases). Again, I stress I'm not an expert on US politics, but I don't see many conservatives balaclava'd up roaming the country doling out violence and intimidation to people whose speech they disagree with.
Ah yes, 99% of the population are terrorists. Seems likely.
Explain why looting a small store during a demonstration is "fighting Fascism" as I personally saw some protestors, who I think would consider themselves Antifa do, when I was in Berkeley last year.
Supporting extrajudicial violence and vigilantism without due process of law is an extreme position
and when you say you support fighting fascists, fascists according to whom exactly?
Conservatives have much more efficient ways of intimidating people. They call the police and have them dole out violence.
It's not.
That wasn't hard.
So Antifa have their heart in the right place, it's just their methods that require attention. A bit like Thanos.
Just don't give them the infinity gauntlet.
But seriously, do you believe that every member of this organisation 'joined' in order to commit acts of terrorism? Or perhaps that they joined to fight against what they saw as right-wing racists, and things, naturally, got out of hand?
"Fists and stones and batons and the gunI distance myself from extremists. I simply don't think fighting fascists is an extremist position.
"Fists and stones and batons and the gun
With courage we shall beat those blackshirts down"
The Sons of Liberty were definitely terrorists.I guess the founding fathers were extremists then.
There are no good Antifa, just like there are no good Nazis (apart from dead ones, in both cases). Again, I stress I'm not an expert on US politics, but I don't see many conservatives balaclava'd up roaming the country doling out violence and intimidation to people whose speech they disagree with.
Yea the nazis know the cops are on their side and they don't need to bother with masks. Though I think they might be getting the message like after NYC and even though the cops were fine with their rioting and attacking people when the videos got out they started getting arrested! Totally unfair.
One might remember what the FBI said about MLK Jr. or groups like the Black Panthers back in the day, as well. As good as it's intentions supposedly were, COINTELPRO was likely a large part of why some elements of both the Civil Rights movement *and* the anti-war movement turned violent.
(I've noticed a general rush to proclaim any non-authoritarian protest group as "terrorist" - Occupy Wall Street and Black Lives Matter being two recent examples. At least "Antifa" is willing to be violent, unlike the former two.)
I guess the founding fathers were extremists then.
I believe the former, if you replace 'terrorism' with violence, intimidation, threat, etc. I don't believe they see themselves as terrorists. There are many peaceful anti-fascist groups out there that people can and do join. The choice to profess allegiance to Antifa in preference to any of these others proves to me that the decision has been made to embrace fascism and violence.
Pointing to examples of good deeds doesn't really address the concern raised about the very frequent poor target selection priority.
"Why did you kick that dog?"
"Relax, I helped an old lady cross the street earlier."
I would think that the antifa people who engage in online 'attacks' aren't halfway as bad as the ones who destroy property and riot, no?