Therefore doesn't have a belief that a god DOES exist. Merely that one MIGHT.An agnostic is a person who has entertained the proposition that there is a God but believes neither that it is true nor that it is false.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/#DefiAgno
Right. I assume he was an agnostic-theist then.I once had a Catholic priest tell me he was agnostic because he was "not a Gnostic". Right.
Agnosticism is the position that one doesn't know whether or not there is God.
But there is also a theological agnosticism in which one asserts that ze cannot know the attributes of God except in metaphor, because God transcends Human language and comprehension. Theological Agnosticism says we can't make any objective statements about the nature of God. But this doesn't exclude encountering God.
Therefore an agnostic-theist doesn't claim they know a god exists. They merely believe one does.Agnosticism is the position that one doesn't know whether or not there is God.
Therefore an agnostic-theist doesn't claim they know a god exists. They merely believe one does.
And an agnostic-atheist doesn't claim to know a god doesn't exist. They merely don't believe one does.
Therefore an agnostic-theist doesn't claim they know a god exists. They merely believe one does.
And an agnostic-atheist doesn't claim to know a god doesn't exist. They merely don't believe one does.
As I clearly said.An Agnostic doesn't make a knowledge claim about the existence of God: Claim to exist, claim not to exist.
Agnostic-theists believe there’s a god. Are you claiming there's no such thing?An Agnostic doesn't make a belief claim either. In most cases I suppose that just reduces to common garden variety atheism.
As I clearly said
Agnostic-theists believe there’s a god. Are you claiming there's no such thing?
I've generally found people who self-identify as “agnostic” do so to define themselves as being in a middle position between theism and atheism. Often they claim this position is somehow “superior”.Whatever the actual definition of agnosticism is, I've generally found people who use it to describe themselves actually to be deists who don't strongly identify with any particular religion.
I've generally found people who self-identify as “agnostic” do a so to define themselves as being in a middle position between theism and atheism. Often they claim this position is somehow “superior”.
And they're likely to call their god something like "Cosmic Consciousness" and deny it's a god.In fact, I'll go a step further: I've never seen a person* who identifies as agnostic act as though a god might not exist. They tend to behave as though there is a god.
*By "person" here, I mean the unreflective, uncritical common individual - the type of person you might meet at a business mixer.
Theism is about belief and faith, it's not about evidence and knowledge.That's how I see it. Until we can determine what god is or isn't, we can't say we know one way or the other. Fair enough to say no evidence, but equally fair to say we don't even know what evidence to look for.
Theism is about belief and faith, it's not about evidence and knowledge.
Would that be credible/empirical evidence, or merely anecdotal/paranormal evidence?Belief can be based on evidence, in theism too.
An Agnostic doesn't make a belief claim either. In most cases I suppose that just reduces to common garden variety atheism.
Theism is about belief and faith, it's not about evidence and knowledge.