• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Define “Agnostic”

ynot

Philosopher
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Messages
9,280
Location
Present
I won’t offer any definition at this time, but I don’t accept any definition that makes “agnostic” a position between “theist” and “atheist”.
 
Agnosticism is the position that one doesn't know whether or not there is God.

But there is also a theological agnosticism in which one asserts that ze cannot know the attributes of God except in metaphor, because God transcends Human language and comprehension. Theological Agnosticism says we can't make any objective statements about the nature of God. But this doesn't exclude encountering God.
 
Agnosticism is the position that one doesn't know whether or not there is God.

But there is also a theological agnosticism in which one asserts that ze cannot know the attributes of God except in metaphor, because God transcends Human language and comprehension. Theological Agnosticism says we can't make any objective statements about the nature of God. But this doesn't exclude encountering God.

That's how I see it. Until we can determine what god is or isn't, we can't say we know one way or the other. Fair enough to say no evidence, but equally fair to say we don't even know what evidence to look for.
 
Agnosticism is the position that one doesn't know whether or not there is God.
Therefore an agnostic-theist doesn't claim they know a god exists. They merely believe one does.

And an agnostic-atheist doesn't claim to know a god doesn't exist. They merely don't believe one does.
 
Therefore an agnostic-theist doesn't claim they know a god exists. They merely believe one does.

And an agnostic-atheist doesn't claim to know a god doesn't exist. They merely don't believe one does.

An Agnostic doesn't make a knowledge claim about the existence of God: Claim to exist, claim not to exist.

An Agnostic doesn't make a belief claim either. In most cases I suppose that just reduces to common garden variety atheism.
 
Therefore an agnostic-theist doesn't claim they know a god exists. They merely believe one does.

And an agnostic-atheist doesn't claim to know a god doesn't exist. They merely don't believe one does.
An Agnostic doesn't make a knowledge claim about the existence of God: Claim to exist, claim not to exist.
As I clearly said.

An Agnostic doesn't make a belief claim either. In most cases I suppose that just reduces to common garden variety atheism.
Agnostic-theists believe there’s a god. Are you claiming there's no such thing?
 
Last edited:
As I clearly said


Agnostic-theists believe there’s a god. Are you claiming there's no such thing?

Sorry. I don't know what an "Agnostic-theist" is.
So I'll just take your word for it.

Oh! I see from Post 5 that an Agnostic Theist is an Theist who is not an Gnostic.
I understand now and agree.
 
Last edited:
Whatever the actual definition of agnosticism is, I've generally found people who use it to describe themselves actually to be deists who don't strongly identify with any particular religion.
 
Whatever the actual definition of agnosticism is, I've generally found people who use it to describe themselves actually to be deists who don't strongly identify with any particular religion.
I've generally found people who self-identify as “agnostic” do so to define themselves as being in a middle position between theism and atheism. Often they claim this position is somehow “superior”.

That deists may not strongly identify with any particular religion doesn’t make them any less religious theists.
 
Last edited:
I've generally found people who self-identify as “agnostic” do a so to define themselves as being in a middle position between theism and atheism. Often they claim this position is somehow “superior”.



In fact, I'll go a step further: I've never seen a person* who identifies as agnostic act as though a god might not exist. They tend to behave as though there is a god.


*By "person" here, I mean the unreflective, uncritical common individual - the type of person you might meet at a business mixer.
 
In fact, I'll go a step further: I've never seen a person* who identifies as agnostic act as though a god might not exist. They tend to behave as though there is a god.


*By "person" here, I mean the unreflective, uncritical common individual - the type of person you might meet at a business mixer.
And they're likely to call their god something like "Cosmic Consciousness" and deny it's a god.
 
That's how I see it. Until we can determine what god is or isn't, we can't say we know one way or the other. Fair enough to say no evidence, but equally fair to say we don't even know what evidence to look for.
Theism is about belief and faith, it's not about evidence and knowledge.
 
Belief can be based on evidence, in theism too.
Would that be credible/empirical evidence, or merely anecdotal/paranormal evidence?

If you have any of the former I'd like to see it.

In other words, is it evidence that can be proven, or does it have to be merely believed?
 
Last edited:
An Agnostic doesn't make a belief claim either. In most cases I suppose that just reduces to common garden variety atheism.

I disagree, an agnostic can make any belief claim they like, theist or atheist, but agnosticism as a position does not support either view.
 
Theism is about belief and faith, it's not about evidence and knowledge.

I wouldn't necessarily phrase it quite like that as it appears perjorative, imho.

"Theisim/Atheism is about belief or the lack of belief and does not address the question of knowledge."

would probably be more neutral.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom