Deeper than primes

Status
Not open for further replies.
91 pages of evidence that any content in a thread beyond the first 4 pages is a pile of crap.
 
zooterkin said:
That's exactly what they have said. Are you accusing them of lying?
Click to expand...
No silly boy:), they mean that the first 20 papers will be checked first without any delay, where the other papers will be checked under regular time.

Do you really believe that QRTF conference will give you a 20 minutes oral talk in front of professional scholars just because you have sent the recipe of your grandma's English cake, as one of the first 20 papers?
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
No silly boy,
Click to expand...

Oh, Doron, how sweet, you're attempting to patronise me!
they mean that the first 20 papers will be checked first without any delay, where the other papers will be checked under regular time.
Click to expand...

The phrase means nothing of the sort. It says the papers will be selected according to the first come, first served principle. The first twenty papers submitted will be selected. If you have any evidence that a different process was followed, feel free to present it here.

Do you really believe that QRTF conference will give you a 20 minutes oral talk in front of professional scholars just because you have sent the recipe of your grandma's English cake, as one of the first 20 papers?
Click to expand...
Well, they accepted a paper about OM.
 
zooterkin said:
The phrase means nothing of the sort. It says the papers will be selected according to the first come, first served principle.
Click to expand...

Selected and first served, where first served means "they will be checked first".

And I don't have to patronize you, you are doing it voluntarily by your last posts.
 
doronshadmi said:
I see that you don't see.
Click to expand...


Why not rather than being so evasive you simply define distinction and show how it is a first order property.

The former requires as little as a basic English explanation of what it means and how it is calculated. The latter, the English equivalent of whatever first-order proposition you allege will do.
 
As for ICMM, here are the main directions of investigations:
http://www.vxu.se/msi/forskn/forskningsgrupper/icmm/mainact.xml

1. Mathematical methods of quantum physics (field theory, Feynman integrals, supersymmetric fields, structure of space-time on Planck distances).

2. Quantum computers and teleportation.

3. Acoustics and theory of partial differential equations (with applications to auto and air-plane modeling).

4. Electromagnetic fields and partial differential equations (with applications to radio and television signals).

5. Chaotic systems in classical and quantum physics (with applications to electrical engineering and cognitive sciences).

6. Cognitive information models and neural networks (with applications to sociology and brain's functioning).

7. Cognitive information models and quantum physics (with applications to sociology).

8. Image analysis and compression of information (for radio and television signals).

9. Fluid dynamics applied to fans and transport.

10. Mathematical models in economy, especially migration models.

11. Financial mathematics with specialization for the Swedish stock market.

12. Wood project (physical and mathematical problems).
Click to expand...
 
jsfisher said:
Why not rather than being so evasive you simply define distinction and show how it is a first order property.

The former requires as little as a basic English explanation of what it means and how it is calculated. The latter, the English equivalent of whatever first-order proposition you allege will do.
Click to expand...

Sadly, we have established that Doron has trouble understanding basic English.
 
zooterkin said:
Sadly, we have established that Doron has trouble understanding basic English.
Click to expand...
jsfisher said:
Why not rather than being so evasive you simply define distinction and show how it is a first order property.

The former requires as little as a basic English explanation of what it means and how it is calculated. The latter, the English equivalent of whatever first-order proposition you allege will do.
Click to expand...
Ask zooterkin, you are a good company for each other.
 
Last edited:
Just out of curiosity, could anyone here sum up, in layman's terms, what the OP is proposing and what the point of contention is? I tried skimming this thread for some actual substance but all I read is pages of:

"blah, blah, blah...my e-peen -- SO BIG!"

So, like, yea....anybody? >_>
 
AkuManiMani said:
Just out of curiosity, could anyone here sum up, in layman's terms, what the OP is proposing and what the point of contention is? I tried skimming this thread for some actual substance but all I read is pages of:

"blah, blah, blah...my e-peen -- SO BIG!"

So, like, yea....anybody? >_>
Click to expand...

That's about it. He tells us how big it is, and how it will make ours obsolete, but he won't show it to us, or tell us what he can actually do with it...
 
AkuManiMani said:
Just out of curiosity, could anyone here sum up, in layman's terms, what the OP is proposing and what the point of contention is? I tried skimming this thread for some actual substance but all I read is pages of:

"blah, blah, blah...my e-peen -- SO BIG!"

So, like, yea....anybody? >_>
Click to expand...

In simple terms, any meaningful research (abstract or not) in exact sciences is the result of the interaction between the researcher and the researched, where the researcher's possible influences on the results are systematically learned, instead of totally ignored.
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
In simple terms, any meaningful research (abstract or not) in exact sciences is the result of the interaction between the researcher and the researched, where the researcher's possible influences on the results are systematically learned, instead of totally ignored.
Click to expand...

Meaningful research? Umm, that's a bold statement from someone that is unable to use terms in any sort of meaningful way.

Want to give distinction a try? Surely you can define this term you use so freely.
 
doronshadmi said:
In simple terms, any meaningful research (abstract or not) in exact sciences is the result of the interaction between the researcher and the researched, where the researcher's possible influences on the results are systematically learned, instead of totally ignored.
Click to expand...

Is Organic Mathematics meaningful research in an exact science? If so, what kinds of interactions were there between you (the researcher) and OM (the researched)? More importantly, what were your (the researcher's) possible influences on the results, influences that were systematically learned, instead of totally ignored?

Aloha,
Brad
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom