Deeper than primes

[doronshadmi]

And? Was he laughed off the stage? Did he get a standing ovation?

The audience has found the lecture very interesting.

 

[sympathic]

The audience has found the lecture very interesting.

Did he cover the immediate successor of [2,5) issue?

 

[doronshadmi]

Did he cover the immediate successor of [2,5) issue?

The immediate successor issue is a Standard Math case, and the lecture was about OM.


Here is the presentation: http://www.omath.org.il/image/users/112431/ftp/my_files/OM-Sweden_D8.pps#256,1,

More stuff:

http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/BasicOM-E.pdf

http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/PreLec.pdf

 

[jsfisher]

The immediate successor issue is a Standard Math case, and the lecture was about OM.


Here is the presentation: http://www.omath.org.il/image/users/112431/ftp/my_files/OM-Sweden_D8.pps#256,1,

More stuff:

http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/BasicOM-E.pdf

http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/PreLec.pdf

I see Klein is incapable of defining "distinction" nor understanding what "first-order property" means.

 

[Little 10 Toes]

When things are done not only by "if A then B" reasoning.

For example, please look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateral_thinking for more details.

Sorry, don't want details, I want clear examples.

 

[Little 10 Toes]

The audience has found the lecture very interesting.

Were you there? Have you spoken to any of the audience members? Is there a transcript of what he said? Do you have any proof to back up your statement?

 

[The Man]

Was it a kindergarten class? This audience does not find your notions interesting, we do however find your inability to accurately express your notions, which are intended to supplant current math, very interesting. Again, although I can not remember whom this statement is attributed to, it goes something like this…

The inability of a presenter to get the point across to the audience demonstrates a lack of understanding, by the presenter, of the subject, the audience or both.

 

[doronshadmi]

I see Klein is incapable of defining "distinction" nor understanding what "first-order property" means.

I see that you don't see.

 

[doronshadmi]

Sorry, don't want details, I want clear examples.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateral_thinking is a very clear example (unless you are too lazy to read it).

 

[doronshadmi]

Was it a kindergarten class?

See http://www.vxu.se/msi/konferens/QTRF5/Program_June4.pdf

 

[zooterkin]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateral_thinking is a very clear example (unless you are too lazy to get it).

Are you trying to claim the benefits of Lateral Thinking for OM?

 

[zooterkin]

See http://www.vxu.se/msi/konferens/QTRF5/Program_June4.pdf

It was a 20 minute slot where there was no vetting of the material being presented. He was simply among the first 20 people to apply. I could have done the same, and presented a paper on the numerical significance of the number of spots on ladybirds' wings.

 

[doronshadmi]

Are you trying to claim the benefits of Lateral Thinking for OM?

By OM I show the benefits of the associations of parallel\serial thinking under a one comprehensive framework.

 

[doronshadmi]

It was a 20 minute slot where there was no vetting of the material being presented. He was simply among the first 20 people to apply. I could have done the same, and presented a paper on the numerical significance of the number of spots on ladybirds' wings.

You are invited to send such a paper to some QM conference and see if they give you 20 minutes.

 

[doronshadmi]

"To air one's view".

Thank you for the correction.

Firstly, that isn't a well known phrase in English; secondly, it's not really the opposite of the former saying. But don't let that bother you, as most corrections don't seem to.

What a poor creative imagination you have zooterkin. But don't let that bother you, as most of your undertanding don't seem to.

 

[zooterkin]

You are invited to send such a paper to some QM conference and see if they give you 20 minutes.

We're talking about this specific conference, for which the call for papers says:

Contributed (oral) talks: 20 min (including questions)The number of possible oral contributed talks is restricted to 20, papers for contributed talks will be selected based on the ”first come, first served” principle. The number of poster presentations is not restricted.

Are you accusing them of lying?

 

[doronshadmi]

We're talking about this specific conference, for which the call for papers says:



Are you accusing them of lying?

The first 20 accepted papers will be first served, zooterkin.

This is the standard way to give people the motivation to send papers.


You really have no understanding of what you read.

 

[zooterkin]

The first 20 accepted papers will be first served, zooterkin.

This is the standard way to give people the motivation to send papers.


You really have no understanding of what you read.

You have the nerve to say that, when you clearly have no understanding of the phrase, "be selected based on the ”first come, first served” principle"?

 

[doronshadmi]

You have the nerve to say that, when you clearly have no understanding of the phrase, "be selected based on the ”first come, first served” principle"?

You have the nerve to think that ICMM will get any paper just because it was one of the first 20 papers that were sent.

Do you think that everyone are cognitively damaged as you?

 

[zooterkin]

You have the nerve to think that ICMM will get any paper just because it was one of the first 20 papers that were sent.

That's exactly what they have said. Are you accusing them of lying?