• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

December Stundie Nominations

I think I love you...So what am I so afraid of.

Stop us before we segue again!
segue.jpg
 
Actually, one of the projects in my high school physics class was to build a structure out of pasta (and it had to be below a certain weight). We then set weights on it until it gave out. You might be surprised how much weight a well-built pasta structure can support.

But they're hardly accurate models of true structures.

And, yeah... those things made quite a mess when they gave out.

We did the same with 4 sheets of A4 paper. The better results were around the 35 kilogram mark.
 
One last one squeezed in on new years eave.

Robin over at The People Forum demonstrates the truther's version of the "dragon in my garage."

Yes, WTC1 & WTC2 are not ordinary controlled demolitions, that has been pointed out by all the sources. But they are not ordinary collapses due to structural failure and/or damage either.

nice bit of special pleading there.

this was followed by this claim

And nano-thermite is not used in ordinary controlled demolitions either.

So, they were controlled demolitions because they looked like "Special" controlled demolitions.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom