Debunking Popular Mechanics

Okay, this may be me showing my ignorance, but here goes:

Is the cat licking it up supposed to be a good thing, or a bad thing?!?!?

These quaint regionalisms can be so confusing!
:D

It's a good thing. True, we Midwesterners in the USA are known for our quaint sayings. On the other hand we produced folks like Thomas Alva Edison and the Wright Brothers. Whaddya gonna do? You take the bitter with the better...
 
The editors flat-out lie when they say that WTC7 was massively damaged when the damage was only minimal, especially in contrast to WTCs 3, 4, 5, and 6.
No, sir. You're the liar here.
wtc_p200009-1.jpg
 
:D

It's a good thing. True, we Midwesterners in the USA are known for our quaint sayings. On the other hand we produced folks like Thomas Alva Edison and the Wright Brothers. Whaddya gonna do? You take the bitter with the better...

Well okay then. I guess I'll have to go take a picture of my cat licking something up, for the next time this comes up :)

Then I'll get a picture of my mother slapping someone in the mouth....
 
Wow. I have never seen someone who ran away from the internet so fast...Kameelyun, you come in here presenting everyone with recycled CF garbage and you don't even stick around to defend yourself. You have not presented one piece of evidence to back up a single one of your claims. Did you just read some CF websites and just simply recap everything that they said? Did you look at any of the evidence yourself?

I noticed that you said you did it like a book report. The kind that you do in school. Well you see kameelyun, when you do a book report in school, you use credible sources. Going to CF websites is not considered credible sources. They all have their own personal belief about 9/11 and their own agendas. The fact that you are just recapping what other CFs have said goes to show what kind of researcher and critical thinker you are. When you care to debate with facts, feel free to come back. Until then, enjoy fantasy land.
 
too bad we can't get "reviews" removed from Amazon.com that are patently false.
 
Well okay then. I guess I'll have to go take a picture of my cat licking something up, for the next time this comes up :)

Then I'll get a picture of my mother slapping someone in the mouth....

Or you could just get a picture of your mother slapping your cat in the mouth. Whatcha think?
 
Background: The Randi Rhodes Message Board spawns from the NYC-based Randi Rhodes radio talk show, one of the few that is NOT rabid right-wing talk in this country. I like Randi's show immensely, and post frequently on her message board. Probably 2,000 of my posts have been dedicated to fighting the 9/11 woo factor, and that is where I saw kameelyun's post of his Popular Mechanics review.

Has Randi made her position clear on the issue? Whenever I hear the topic come up, she seems to hedge a lot, but sounds more sympathetic than not. I know she is a big fan of that group of widows who keeps asking for another review.

OTOH, Randi got nothing on Rachel Maddow, by far the best on Air America.

BTW, did you hear Al Franken is quitting as of Feb 14? Speculation is that it is in preparation for a senate bid.
 
Or you could just get a picture of your mother slapping your cat in the mouth. Whatcha think?

Nah, slapping the cat is my Dad's hobby. In his defence, biting my Dad is the cat's hobby, and he started it, so it all works out....
 
Our government has been infiltrated. Many governments have been infiltrated.

In the below thread there are clues as to how this infiltration is conducted.

So Christopher's only objection is that the review wasn't crazy enough.
 
It didn't take him long to realize he had brought a whiffle bat to a gun fight.

Pretty smart, for a troofer!

I'm reminded of the South Park episode where Cartman finally decides to kill Kyle.

"What are you doing?"

"I'm killing you, Kyle. I could only afford a whiffle bat, so it will take some time....." Thwap! Thwap!
 
He came back and left again...

Jeez, that's too bad. I think the only question of mine that he answered was that he has no technical expertise in engineering or fires at all.

Well, by that logic, since I have no experience or knowledge of juggling chainsaws, I should go out and set up a school to teach the subject.

"Those who can't, teach!"

Well, he had a self-fulfilling prophecy, and it came to pass.
 
Background: The Randi Rhodes Message Board spawns from the NYC-based Randi Rhodes radio talk show

And here I thought that you and kameelyun were just big Ozzy Osbourne fans.

I imagined posts like this:

"Yeah, that guitar solo in 'Crazy Train' is pretty bitchin', but what's the deal with WTC7?"
 
kameelyun:

Too bad you're gone now. As a fellow seeker of truth like you, I heard that you were involved in the death of Vince Foster. Now, as a seeker of truth it is not my responsibility to provide any evidence of my claim, but my role is just to spur on an investigation.

Someone should investigate you.

How do you like your logic, kameelyun ?

Lurker
 
too bad we can't get "reviews" removed from Amazon.com that are patently false.
Actually, the author can take steps to get a review removed. My mate has twice had reviews removed after demonstating why they should not be allowed. So while I think you are right that we could not get it removed, it still might be possible.
 
I knew within a few posts I would get the "what are your engineering qualifications?" My answer is: none, other than that I am a concerned citizen. Also, having no engineering qualifications actually makes the MIHOP case stronger: If the demolition is so obvious that even a non-scientist can call on it with certainty... you get my point.

I'm not an expert on fire or smoke either. Maybe the black stuff emanating from the WTC wasn't really smoke. It just "looked" like smoke. You know the "air pressure" coming from WTC 7 as it collapses? MAN, they look like blast points!

Okahy Kameelyun

I AM a qualified architect who works on tall buildings and has also studied structures AND fire engineering at university for several years (they're part of the compuslory core curriculum).

What aspects of these would you like to discuss as regards the collapse of the WTC?
 
Okahy Kameelyun

I AM a qualified architect who works on tall buildings and has also studied structures AND fire engineering at university for several years (they're part of the compuslory core curriculum).

What aspects of these would you like to discuss as regards the collapse of the WTC?


Och now, be away with you... Kameelyun don't need no experts...he/she/it has 'common sense'
:D
 
Och now, be away with you... Kameelyun don't need no experts...he/she/it has 'common sense'
:D

Let's give the man a chance.

Back at work today at last. MAAAAN the eejit clients have gone and changed things while I was off!!! You'd think they were their buildings or something!!!! :eek:
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom