Debunking Popular Mechanics

I was walking by a newstand and there was Popular Mechanics. I am pretty sure it exists. Ill take a picture next time.
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
pfft, it'll still be out of focus, and with jerky camera movements.
Click to expand...


Maybe Firecoins could interview the editor to validate the authenticity of the publication?

NAH...the crappy photo and video is proof-positive. Plus the editor is a paid shill. That rag supports PNAC and the rest of the NEOCONZIS.

PM+Neocons=inside job. It's so obvious.
 
I consider all of them pointless, but the audio I linked to was pretty damn interesting. The evasion was almost woo like. Surprising.
 
robinson said:
The evasion is woo like. How strange.
Click to expand...
I listened to the audio. Coburn handles the questions very poorly. The host is entirely wrong in his assertions. The caller is technically correct that "pull" is a demolition term. It is used in conventional demolition circles to mean attaching cables to a portion of a building and physically pulling it down. It is not a term used for explosive demolitions, which is the distinction Coburn should have made.

The DNA of 10 hijackers was matched to profiles from samples found in motel rooms, rental cars, etc. There was no DNA of relatives to match it to. An interesting fact is that remains from two brothers was recovered at the Pentagon and identified as fraternal by DNA analysis. The only brothers who died there on 9/11? Two of the hijackers.
 
No, the evading of the question about DNA evidence. I guess he just didn't know the answer. Unlike Gravy, who seems to know the answer.
 
From long ago, the failed logic of 9/11 truth was and is constant

kameelyun said:
...

Another outright lie concerns the thoroughness of our air defense system. PM claims that only one airplane (Payne Stewart's ill-fated private jet) was intercepted in the decade prior to 9/11. Not true. Sixty-seven of them occurred in just the one year before 9/11 alone. The 'one intercept' lie serves to back another one of PM's lies: that the Airforce was previously only trained to handle foreign attacks, coming from beyond our borders, and that the U.S. continental mainland was a defenseless donut-hole. Blatant falsehood.
.
Click to expand...
It is true, NORAD looked out and patrolled in the ADIZ, not over the USA. There were no armed aircraft intercepting Payne Stewart's aircraft. NORAD did not launch alert birds, and the ad hoc interception cooridanted with FAA and USAF units. Intercept took over an hour... oops not fast enough to stop the first 3 jets on 9/11. The 67 intercept were all in the ADIZ, not over the USA.

There were no armed fighters used over the USA, except range practice - it helps minimize accident with bombs and missiles. There were no procedures to instantly take off and intercept commercial airlines over the USA, thus the fighters on 9/11 had to wait for safety, for the FAA to clear flight path. I have no doubt if a USAF pilot had a clue about the hijacking he would declare an emergency climbing in burner to 51,000 feet and get FAA to clear him down as he arrived in PA or NYC. After 9/11, procedures, aka lack of procedures changed.

Why do 9/11 truth liars project lies to others. Right, it is their only skill.

Where have all the failed 9/11 truth liars gone? Here is a veteran truther, does this truther still spread lies. Or has the truth gone back and deleted and explained the claims were bogus due to ignorance.

Where have all the veteran 9/11 truth spreaders of lies gone.

Yes, old thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom