DC: Why do you think WTC7 was a CD?

lapman said:
No, you should. Listen again. He only hears the "thump, thump, thump" while he is running away from the building AFTER the collapse started. Listen again. The only time he mentions "explosion" prior to the collapse, he is talking about the radio chatter and nothing else.
Click to expand...

ah oc we can ignore that he belives to have heared explosions :)
 
Dictator Cheney said:
ah oc we can ignore that he belives to have heared explosions :)
Click to expand...
Aahh, yes we can because what he "heard" could be something other than explosives, like the floors hitting each other. The fact you are doing everything you can to avoid is that there were no explosive sequence PRIOR to the collapse.
 
Last edited:
lapman said:
Aahh, yes we can because what he "heard" could be something other than explosive, like the floors hitting each other. The fact you are doing everything you can to avoid is that there were no explosive sequence PRIOR to the collapse.
Click to expand...

yeah oc you know alot better what he heard :)

typical
 
lapman said:
Yeah, oc you would continue to avoid addressing the fact that what he heard, while running for his life, was after the start of the collapse.

typical
Click to expand...

what travels faster, light or sound?
 
DC, are you back to claiming detonation charges initiated the supposed controlled demolition of WTC7? I thought you gave that up in favor of thermite.

You can trot out all the testimony you want that shows a handful of people heard random explosions. None of it supports a controlled demolition theory.

As you have been told numerous times, the detonation charges of a controlled demolition are very loud and very distinctive. They would have been heard by everyone and been picked up by every recording device in the vicinity. This simply did not occur on 9/11. No amount of spin you put on witness testimony changes that.

Go back to thermite, sport.
 
johnny karate said:
DC, are you back to claiming detonation charges initiated the supposed controlled demolition of WTC7? I thought you gave that up in favor of thermite.

You can trot out all the testimony you want that shows a handful of people heard random explosions. None of it supports a controlled demolition theory.

As you have been told numerous times, the detonation charges of a controlled demolition are very loud and very distinctive. They would have been heard by everyone and been picked up by every recording device in the vicinity. This simply did not occur on 9/11. No amount of spin you put on witness testimony changes that.

Go back to thermite, sport.
Click to expand...

i didnt claim that, nor did i ever give it up :)
 
Dictator Cheney said:
what was Craig Bartmers distance to WTC7?
Click to expand...
Acording to him, right next to it. So, why do we hear the explosive sequence prior to the collapse of the Landmark implosion, and every other implosion video that is within a few blocks of one, and Craig heard nothing until long after the start of the collapse of WTC 7?
 
lapman said:
Acording to him, right next to it. So, why do we hear the explosive sequence prior to the collapse of the Landmark implosion, and every other implosion video that is within a few blocks of one, and Craig heard nothing until long after the start of the collapse of WTC 7?
Click to expand...

long after? how long? the collapse didnt take long.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
btw its the "debunkers" that spin the testimonys.
Click to expand...

Really? Then please provide witness testimony that unequivocally describes the very loud and very distinctive detonation charges of a controlled demolition. Then please offer an explanation why they weren't heard by everyone and been picked up by every recording device in the vicinity.
 
johnny karate said:
Really? Then please provide witness testimony that unequivocally describes the very loud and very distinctive detonation charges of a controlled demolition. Then please offer an explanation why they weren't heard by everyone and been picked up by every recording device in the vicinity.
Click to expand...

no, you will then just claim they heard something else, they was mistaken, they are liars etc :)

not worth the effort.

First the official side should prove theyr collapse theory.

can you?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom