• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

DC: Why do you think WTC7 was a CD?

Dictator Cheney said:
whats your evidence for all demolition experts -1?
Click to expand...

It's not nice to reply to a question with a question. You're long on questions and short on answers. Doesn't that ever cause you to reconsider the position you are taking with regards to WTC7?
 
Dictator Cheney said:
whats your evidence for all demolition experts -1?
Click to expand...


Well, the truth is, I haven't contacted all demolition experts. I have spoken with Danny Jowenko, however, and I have obtained confirmation from two dozen demolition companies that people in the industry don't talk about "pulling" buildings. All of the demolition experts who have been gracious enough to answer my questions contend that WTC 7 does not resemble a controlled demolition. It comes back to that inconvenient business the conspiracy liars keep ignoring: where was the series of simultaneous explosions followed by the collapse of the building? It didn't happen. You can tap dance forever, but the lies of the fantasy movement have been exposed.
 
pomeroo said:
Well, the truth is, I haven't contacted all demolition experts. I have spoken with Danny Jowenko, however, and I have obtained confirmation from two dozen demolition companies that people in the industry don't talk about "pulling" buildings. All of the demolition experts who have been gracious enough to answer my questions contend that WTC 7 does not resemble a controlled demolition. It comes back to that inconvenient business the conspiracy liars keep ignoring: where was the series of simultaneous explosions followed by the collapse of the building? It didn't happen. You can tap dance forever, but the lies of the fantasy movement have been exposed.
Click to expand...

does that mean Danny Jovenko changed his mind and agreed that WTC7 was not a CD?
 
Dictator Cheney said:
does that mean Danny Jovenko changed his mind and agreed that WTC7 was not a CD?
Click to expand...


I suspect the reason that you waste so much time slipping and sliding is that you really don't know what you're talking about. You bring nothing to the table apart from your irrational hatred of America. You try, ineptly, to debate physics and engineering with real physicists and engineers. You avoid all inconvenient questions.

I don't know what Danny Jowenko's agenda is. I know that he has not studied the collapse of WTC 7 and he has said things that other demolition professionals find ludicrous.

In a controlled demolition, a carefully-arranged series of charges go off simultaneously. You see, without planning and preparation, the demolition would not be controlled. NOBODY noticed a series of explosions followed by the collapse of the building--NOBODY!
 
applecorped said:
DC, is CD of WTC7 a fact to you or not? There have been contradictory statements by you and I'm not sure at this point what you believe. If you truly believe it was a CD then what would be the point of reading the upcoming report? If you are waiting for the report then just state that and stick to it. After the above post you went on to state emphatically that it was obvious that it was CD. Slow down, remember what you posted earlier before posting again.
Click to expand...

is english your main language?
 
pomeroo said:
I suspect the reason that you waste so much time slipping and sliding is that you really don't know what you're talking about. You bring nothing to the table apart from your irrational hatred of America. You try, ineptly, to debate physics and engineering with real physicists and engineers. You avoid all inconvenient questions.

I don't know what Danny Jowenko's agenda is. I know that he has not studied the collapse of WTC 7 and he has said things that other demolition professionals find ludicrous.

In a controlled demolition, a carefully-arranged series of charges go off simultaneously. You see, without planning and preparation, the demolition would not be controlled. NOBODY noticed a series of explosions followed by the collapse of the building--NOBODY!
Click to expand...

what is Craig Bartmer's Agenda?
 
i say "well before i would consider the CD of WTC 7 a fact, i would like to read the official theory to it first."

you ask " is CD of WTC7 a fact to you or not?"

:bwall
 
ah ok, i see he is one of those that missheared something, got it wrong or are in on the woo.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
ah ok, i see he is one of those that missheared something, got it wrong or are in on the woo.
Click to expand...


You don't like to read, do you?

You refuse to attempt to read a paper by a retired battalion chief of the FDNY and you refuse to check out the thread linking you to a discussion of Craig Bartmer's claims.

WTC 7 was not brought down in a controlled demolition: the task of preparing a 47-story building for demolition is a daunting one, not something could be accomplished in a matter of hours or even days. No simultaneous explosions preceded the collapse of the building.
 
pomeroo said:
You don't like to read, do you?

You refuse to attempt to read a paper by a retired battalion chief of the FDNY and you refuse to check out the thread linking you to a discussion of Craig Bartmer's claims.

WTC 7 was not brought down in a controlled demolition: the task of preparing a 47-story building for demolition is a daunting one, not something could be accomplished in a matter of hours or even days. No simultaneous explosions preceded the collapse of the building.
Click to expand...

well the conclusion from the 9/11 collapses without CD would be.
it does not need simoultaneous explosions nor explosions in a precisely calculated sequence. nor does it need the removal of non load bearing walls that could act up as stiffeners, to bring down buildings relatively symetric.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
well the conclusion from the 9/11 collapses without CD would be.
it does not need simoultaneous explosions nor explosions in a precisely calculated sequence. nor does it need the removal of non load bearing walls that could act up as stiffeners, to bring down buildings relatively symetric.
Click to expand...
Your problem is there's no evidence of any explosives period.

And I'm still waiting for you to explain this "linear thermite cutter" you mention every now and then.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
well the conclusion from the 9/11 collapses without CD would be.
it does not need simoultaneous explosions nor explosions in a precisely calculated sequence. nor does it need the removal of non load bearing walls that could act up as stiffeners, to bring down buildings relatively symetric.
Click to expand...


You don't know what you're talking about. There is zero evidence for the use of explosives anywhere in the WTC complex on the day of the jihadist attacks. NIST explained the collapse mechanism for the Towers. No one in the fantasy movement has discovered a significant error in NIST's analysis, although charlatans like Heiwa have made themselves look ridiculous attempting a task they are manifestly unqualified for.
 
WildCat said:
Your problem is there's no evidence of any explosives period.

And I'm still waiting for you to explain this "linear thermite cutter" you mention every now and then.
Click to expand...

thermite_cutting_sys_071210_4337.jpg


something like that i think
 
pomeroo said:
You don't know what you're talking about. There is zero evidence for the use of explosives anywhere in the WTC complex on the day of the jihadist attacks. NIST explained the collapse mechanism for the Towers. No one in the fantasy movement has discovered a significant error in NIST's analysis, although charlatans like Heiwa have made themselves look ridiculous attempting a task they are manifestly unqualified for.
Click to expand...

NIST explained the collapse mechanism for the Towers

really?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom