• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

DC: Why do you think WTC7 was a CD?

I don't know about you, but the top of the tower doesn't exactly look like it's falling all that symmetrically to me. Maybe it's the whole leaning thing. Am I wrong?
[qimg]http://www.debunking911.com/wtc-southtower.jpg[/qimg]

uups
that one is WTC7? i thaught thats the south tower.
 
I don't think the OP will be answered truthfully by the the person the question was addressed to. It seems every attempt was made by many people but sometimes an untenable position is hard to give up. Pride and ego does that to some people.

i answered it several times.
 
Ok, my bad. Still, the east penthouse collapsing first would still be considered asymmetrical.

my bad i should have said nearly symmetric.
it still did not really collapse to the damaged side.
 
Last edited:
my bad i should have said nearly symmetric.
it still did not really collapse to the damaged side.

Actually, as pointed out earlier, quite a bit of it fell to the South.

http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o72/ardoucette/WTC7debrislyingonWTC3.jpg

Of course, its HIGHLY unlikely that a large steel framed skyscraper will fall any way but straight down.

That is UNLESS you get it moving to the side by carefully placed CD charges.

This might help illustrate why that is so:

wtccoreshilouette.jpg
 
Actually, as pointed out earlier, quite a bit of it fell to the South.

http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o72/ardoucette/WTC7debrislyingonWTC3.jpg

Of course, its HIGHLY unlikely that a large steel framed skyscraper will fall any way but straight down.

That is UNLESS you get it moving to the side by carefully placed CD charges.

This might help illustrate why that is so:

[qimg]http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o72/ardoucette/wtccoreshilouette.jpg[/qimg]

sorry i cant see WTC7 on your picture.
 
sorry i cant see WTC7 on your picture.

http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o72/ardoucette/WTC7debrislyingonWTC3.jpg

In this picture the fallen remains of WTC 7 includes the mass of parallel brown pieces of steel draped over what's left of WTC 6.

The black crane, in the top left, sticking up at ~ 45 degree angle is removing pieces of WTC 7.

WTC 6 is between the remains of WTC 7 (top of picture) and has the remains of the north side of WTC 1 leaning against it (center of picture).
 
http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o72/ardoucette/WTC7debrislyingonWTC3.jpg

In this picture the fallen remains of WTC 7 includes the mass of parallel brown pieces of steel draped over what's left of WTC 6.

The black crane, in the top left, sticking up at ~ 45 degree angle is removing pieces of WTC 7.

WTC 6 is between the remains of WTC 7 (top of picture) and has the remains of the north side of WTC 1 leaning against it (center of picture).

from another perspective it looks pretty diffrent

gz_aerial_wtc7.jpg
 
my bad i should have said nearly symmetric.
it still did not really collapse to the damaged side.
I would say that they east penthouse collapsing and the rest of the building taking over 8 seconds to catch up is very asymmetrical. Even when the rest of the building starts to collapse, the remaining roof structures are still collapsing faster than the facade. Still asymmetrical.
 
Larry said pull it and Larry is a joo and a businessman. That is enough for the 9/11 twoofers. I guess what we can see about the conspiracies involving Larry Silverstein, zionist, Rothschilds is that history repeats itself. Martin Luther was an anti-semite. Oh yeah and lets not forget how some people blamed joos what happend to Jesus and some still do that. I guess people never learn and history repeats itself. I bet twoofers believe people like David Irving who was proven to be a liar and people like David Duke who is a former KKK member but they do not believe Larry and everybody knows why.
 
from another perspective it looks pretty diffrent

It looks different NOT because of the perspective, but because this picture is CLEARLY taken days later and after the part of WTC 7 that is laying ON TOP of WTC 6 has been removed.
 
Last edited:
It looks different NOT because of the perspective, but because this picture is CLEARLY taken days later and after the part of WTC 7 that is laying ON TOP of WTC 6 has been removed.

no, look at the picture closely, the parts are NOT on top of 6.
do you have other pictures that would show that?
 
not evenly spreaded fires.
Okay, now how do you determine whether or not a fire is evenly spread? What criteria do you use where you say this fire is evenly spread but that fire is unevenly spread? I trust you have something approaching definable criteria which lets you make this distinction so that you can explain those criteria to everyone else.

How do you tell when a fire has crossed from the point of being evenly spread to unevenly spread?

Also, of what consequence is the symmetry of the fire? What is the basis for your belief that an asymmetric fire must always result in a asymmetric collapse? Something more than just your gut feeling I hope?
 
Last edited:
Okay, now how do you determine whether or not a fire is evenly spread? What criteria do you use where you say this fire is evenly spread but that fire is unevenly spread? I trust you have something approaching definable criteria which lets you make this distinction so that you can explain those criteria to everyone else.

How do you tell when a fire has crossed from the point of being evenly spread to unevenly spread?

Also, of what consequence is the symmetry of the fire? What is the basis for your belief that an asymmetric fire must always result in a asymmetric collapse? Something more than just your gut feeling I hope?

you know pretty well what is ment.

but you do like for CD experts it does not mather which column they demolish, also the time when the do it is not important.
it will result in a straight down collapse.
 

Back
Top Bottom