David Horrowitz encounters genocidal Muslim student.

[ravdin]

I stopped watching this video as soon as she said "Homeland Security". If Horowitz chooses to engage in debates with self-righteous, self-created martyrs, that is his problem and his fault.

If you don't care to watch the video, that's up to you. But you're completely missing the point of the discussion on this thread if you didn't watch it to the end.

 

[Thunder]

If you don't care to watch the video, that's up to you. But you're completely missing the point of the discussion on this thread if you didn't watch it to the end.

as soon as she said "Homeland Security", I knew what she was all about.

as soon as he answered her very simple question..with another question, I knew what he was all about.

nothing more to see. Im sure I can figure out what happened next.

Horowitz has only himself to blaim for engaging with this girl. He knew quite well what he was doing and what the result may be.

 

[WildCat]

Horowitz has only himself to blaim for engaging with this girl. He knew quite well what he was doing and what the result may be.

What would he be "blaiming"[sic] himself for, exactly?

 

[Thunder]

What would he be "blaiming"[sic] himself for, exactly?

he should be blaming himself for:

#1. not answering the girl's clear question...honestly and clearly.

#2. not ending the "debate" as soon as it was clear where it was headed.

if he was really there to educate and inform, he would have put an end to it and moved on to the next questioner.

 

[WildCat]

he should be blaming himself for:

#1. not answering the girl's clear question...honestly and clearly.

#2. not ending the "debate" as soon as it was clear where it was headed.

if he was really there to educate and inform, he would have put an end to it and moved on to the next questioner.

She was demanding proof (the best I can make of her rambling "question") that MSAs are supporting "Jihad terrorist networks".

Horowitz asked her a question about her own (she is a MSA member) support of Hamas, and she indeed supports Hamas. Even in its mission to kill all Jews.

Kind of sucks the air out of her question, doesn't it?

 

[Safe-Keeper]

#1. not answering the girl's clear question...honestly and clearly.

I take it you missed the HAMAS part.

#2. not ending the "debate" as soon as it was clear where it was headed.

Beautiful. When a bigot spews bigotry it's the recipient's fault for not telling him/her to shut up.

 

[Thunder]

She was demanding proof (the best I can make of her rambling "question") that MSAs are supporting "Jihad terrorist networks".

Horowitz asked her a question about her own (she is a MSA member) support of Hamas

answering a question...with another question...is a great way of avoiding answering the question. its also a great way to provoke a confrontation.

I always knew Horowitz was a dick. Now I know he is a loser too.

 

[Thunder]

Beautiful. When a bigot spews bigotry it's the recipient's fault for not telling him/her to shut up.

maybe if Horowitz just answered the damn question in the first place (that's assuming he COULD), maybe no supposed bigotry would have been spewed.

 

[WildCat]

answering a question...with another question...is a great way of avoiding answering the question. its also a great way to provoke a confrontation.

I always knew Horowitz was a dick. Now I know he is a loser too.

It was a question directly on the topic!

The woman was playing dumb, demanding proof that MSAs support "Jihad terrorist networks", then she says she supports Hamas.

How the hell does that not answer the question?

 

[Thunder]

It was a question directly on the topic!

if Horowitz was a serious individual, and not a bigoted ideologue moron, he would have just answered her damn question and moved on.

did this girl SPEAK for MSA? was she their President?

Horowitz was being a dick..and got what he deserved.

 

[WildCat]

if Horowitz was a serious individual, and not a bigoted ideologue moron, he would have just answered her damn question and moved on.

That's exactly what he did.

Thick as a brick.

 

[WildCat]

answering a question...with another question...is a great way of avoiding answering the question. its also a great way to provoke a confrontation.

I always knew Horowitz was a dick. Now I know he is a loser too.

Hmmm...

Seriously, do you actually have any knowledge of the Middle East conflict? Any history of the area at all?

do you?

By your own standards and definition, you're a loser.

 

[Thunder]

Hmmm...
By your own standards and definition, you're a loser.

fascinating debate strategy you got there.

In my book, this means you either admit defeat, or are too lazy to debate the thread. Or both.

 

[WildCat]

fascinating debate strategy you got there.

In my book, this means you either admit defeat, or are too lazy to debate the thread. Or both.

And now you've proven you deliberately "avoid answering questions" and are just "looking for a confrontation".

You already lost the debate. You can't even bear to comment on the topic in the OP, which is why you're desperately trying to change the subject.

 

[Thunder]

"avoid answering questions" and are just "looking for a confrontation".

oh, you mean like calling another JREF member a "loser"?

tell me, dear Wildcat, what insult did I make against you, to provoke such a statement?

 

[Pardalis]

maybe if Horowitz just answered the damn question in the first place

He answered with an example. The girl herself was the example, and it made his point.

 

[Thunder]

He answered with an example. The girl herself was the example, and it made his point.

I fail to see how expressing opinions in support of Hamas' military and/or humanitarian actions, is proof positive of a financial or bureaucratic link with Hamas.

I support much of the actions and legislation proposed by the Czech Social-Democratic Party. That doesn't mean I am in any way actually linked to them.

what's next...deporting people for saying "I like Hamas"?

 

[Pardalis]

The failure is all your own. She wants to kill people like you, and you just won't see it.

Too bad.

 

[Safe-Keeper]

fascinating debate strategy you got there.

In my book, this means you either admit defeat, or are too lazy to debate the thread. Or both.

So when people you dislike answer questions with questions, it makes them losers, but when you do it and someone calls you on it, they have "lost the debate" by default?

 

[WildCat]

oh, you mean like calling another JREF member a "loser"?

tell me, dear Wildcat, what insult did I make against you, to provoke such a statement?

I didn't call you a loser parky, I just said you were one according to your own definition. The one you used as an excuse to run away from the topic of the thread.