Merged Core-led collapse and explosive demolition

Look! Up in the sky! It's a bird...it's a plane...it's Ergo!--hoist with his own petard!

Not that he'll know what that is either....
 
Yes, we did in fact see lots of barotraumatic injuries after the OKC bombing. Did you see all the people with blood coming out of their ears?

That is the first sign of a barotraumatic injury.

Good call chief!! LOL!!!

ETA: So that way you don't run you mouth, here's the documentation.

http://www.ok.gov/health/documents/OKC_Bombing.pdf

"Forty-six percent suffered auditory injuries;" Do you know what an auditory injury is?

"Forty-nine percent of the study population suffered hearing injuries including ruptured eardrums, short-term or long-term hearing loss, tinnitus, and equilibrium/balance problems."

ALL of these are barotraumatic injuries.

Now, run along.

Good find on the Oklahoma City Bombing (Murrah Building) injuries!

# oysteinbookmark
 
Yes, we did in fact see lots of barotraumatic injuries after the OKC bombing. Did you see all the people with blood coming out of their ears?

That is the first sign of a barotraumatic injury.

Good call chief!! LOL!!!

ETA: So that way you don't run you mouth, here's the documentation.

http://www.ok.gov/health/documents/OKC_Bombing.pdf

"Forty-six percent suffered auditory injuries;" Do you know what an auditory injury is?

"Forty-nine percent of the study population suffered hearing injuries including ruptured eardrums, short-term or long-term hearing loss, tinnitus, and equilibrium/balance problems."

ALL of these are barotraumatic injuries.

Now, run along.

And of course it also doesn't look at the images from around the OKC bombing which show nearly ALL of the glass in ALL of the nearby buildings (and cars) having shattered.

Unlike photos from buildings RIGHT NEXT to the towers/wtc7 with mostly intact glass... except where it was broken by falling debris.

But we went in this circle with a different twoof (unless it is a smelly sock) about a year ago....

Try again ergo.

ETA: So out of 684 people injured, 46% had some type of barotrauma.... that would be 314 people experienced noticeable barotrauma.

I think the graph of figure 7 on pg 5 of the report demonstrates the barotrauma perfectly... the location of the people who had the easily seen barotrauma (hearing loss)
 
Last edited:
Good find on the Oklahoma City Bombing (Murrah Building) injuries!

# oysteinbookmark

HEY!! Alright!! I got a coveted #oysteinbookmark!! WOOT!!

Thanks. Now, how long will Ergo handwave and tapdance around it?

Talk about an epic fail!!
 
Yes, we did in fact see lots of barotraumatic injuries after the OKC bombing. Did you see all the people with blood coming out of their ears?

That is the first sign of a barotraumatic injury.

Good call chief!! LOL!!!

ETA: So that way you don't run you mouth, here's the documentation.

http://www.ok.gov/health/documents/OKC_Bombing.pdf

"Forty-six percent suffered auditory injuries;" Do you know what an auditory injury is?

"Forty-nine percent of the study population suffered hearing injuries including ruptured eardrums, short-term or long-term hearing loss, tinnitus, and equilibrium/balance problems."

ALL of these are barotraumatic injuries.

Now, run along.

Wow.

Truther got an online wedgie with that one, LOL...

This was an enhanced ANFO bomb? IIRC, he used nitromethane and diesel in addition to the fertilizer?
 
Wow.

Truther got an online wedgie with that one, LOL...

This was an enhanced ANFO bomb? IIRC, he used nitromethane and diesel in addition to the fertilizer?

wedgie.gif


IIRC, that is what he used.
 
No, you just don't understand a hypothetical.

:D

Of course, you don't understand into vs onto either, so what should I expect?

You must feel like you're losing the argument if you have to resort to TrutherLies' isms. Pathetic.
Edited by kmortis: 
Correctly spelled poster's username


That was a 3200kg bomb. This would call for multiple tonnes(one ton is 2000kg) of explosives and equipment.

:eye-poppi

Just one tower would've called for tons of explosives.


Where is it when you reach the maximum of stupid? Oh yeah. Boring.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:D

You must feel like you're losing the argument if you have to resort to TruthersLie' isms. Pathetic.
Edited by kmortis: 
Correctly spelled poster's username


:eye-poppi

Where is it when you reach the maximum of stupid? Oh yeah. Boring.
Ergo, you are truly a unique individual.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, Trifor, I usually can't see your posts.

Trifor said:
http://www.ok.gov/health/documents/OKC_Bombing.pdf:

The proportion of people who did not hear the noise was highest in the Murrah Building (45%)


Oh, do they mean the one that got bombed?

Of persons who sustained hearing injuries, 62% heard the noise of the blast while 29% did not. The highest proportion of people who suffered hearing injuries were located outdoors (72%) and in vehicles (67%)


Oh, you mean, where the bomb was detonated? Where the sound waves had little to no mitigation?

Thank you for the link, Trifor. I think this makes my point. Read the OP, folks, and stay on topic.

Remember, hearing damage at a half-mile.

:rolleyes:
 
So, is that a yes, or a no on this comment.
ergo said:
So we would have seen extensive barotrauma at the site of the Murrah building bombing, yes?

I think that is a resounding YES, in fact we DID see LOTS of barotrauma injuries at the site of the OKC bombing.
 
:D



You must feel like you're losing the argument if you have to resort to TruthersLie' isms. Pathetic.
Edited by kmortis: 
Correctly spelled poster's username




:eye-poppi




Where is it when you reach the maximum of stupid? Oh yeah. Boring.

into vs onto
essentially vs actually
footprint
center of mass vs debris field the size of the moon
about
exponentially

shall we continue?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Back
Top Bottom