Can see it getting embarrassing.
Good on the dude though I
How sad that cullennz was raptured before he could complete this post![]()
The more I think about the guy, much as I admire him and what he is trying to do, the more I think he is probably a lightweight thrown into the deep end - a political minnow in a pool of sharks. He has had this role thrust upon him. I'm sorry to say it but I doubt he is up to the rough and tumble and it is only a matter of time before he goes - potentially because of 'health' reasons or some such to keep the people that voted for him on board.
Well when the field was almost finalised it was felt there wasn't a wide enough spectrum of political positions to choose from, so they identified someone from the far(ish) left. Nobody thought he stood a hope in hell. Foot/shot in.
Why? It's not like he appointed him as shadow health secretary, preferring to give that job to someone who has been at the forefront of the campaign against Tory-led attacks on the main (real) NHS hospital in her area.Ridiculous. Corbyn's support will give the quacks credibility. How many people do you want to die before the quacks lies are exposed?
Maybe it was, but it was also 100% consistent with everything he's said over many years.
Well, that's almost right.....and any comment I have made about his electability are my (entirely mine) predictions. Only predictions, and not knowledge. However, there are clues from history, particularly that you don't win elections in the modern UK from the margins of extreme right or extreme left. So I don't "know" anything about his electability other than that a victory for him would be bucking some extremely well entrenched trends. I predict that he won't.
This again? I'd say Thatcher was very right-wing, but if we can't agree on that then discussion is pointless. Assuming we can agree, then you seem to have defined "modern" as post-Thatcher. In terms of leaders who actually won an election, this means Major, Blair and Cameron. Rather a small sample from which to reach dogmatic conclusions about the future of UK politics, I'd say.
I don't think that sort of response would make him a figure of ridicule in the country, whatever might be the reaction of the Yahoos in parliament. I hope, for example, that he would get immediate praise from the new enlarged SNP contingent, who are still not on terms with some of the idiotic customs of the House, and that sensible voters would sustain and applaud him.Cameron might say, "the Labour Party are not all singing from the same hymn sheet, and in the leader's case not singing at all. Boom boom!"
Corbyn would need to come back with a witty put-down, but I fear he might say something like, "oh just grow up!" And be laughed at.
Politeness and due gravity are not obstacles to holding politicians to account. To the contrary, I believe.As they said on Daily Politics, if he is going to be polite and less adversarial than previously, he runs the risk of not actually holding the PM to account
I don't think that sort of response would make him a figure of ridicule in the country, whatever might be the reaction of the Yahoos in parliament. I hope, for example, that he would get immediate praise from the new enlarged SNP contingent, who are still not on terms with some of the idiotic customs of the House, and that sensible voters would sustain and applaud him.
Corbyn has to be like the wee boy in the Emperor's New Clothes, who pricks the bubble of delusion and self-consciousness that has until now inhibited the Yahoos from rejecting with revulsion the absurdities with which they have belittled the legislature to which they were elected by the people's suffrage.
I predict much braying and cat-calling. Can I have my money now?