And yet another investigation has shown that Russia has been dishonest in its discussion of the downing of MH17, this time they have been shown to have doctored photographs.
Russia Doctored Photos in Shooting Down of Airliner, Report Finds
Actual forensic experts don't even take the time to comment in detail on the Brown Noses crap anymore, they just point and laugh. An outrage that they are still peddled by the usual propaganda outlets - or better that people still buy it.
Actual forensic experts don't even take the time to comment in detail on the Brown Noses crap anymore, they just point and laugh. An outrage that they are still peddled by the usual propaganda outlets - or better that people still buy it.
Very interesting. And what, pray tell, leads you to certainty as to Mr. Charles Wood's qualifications in forensics? His twitter profile?
So why don't you debunk all the rest of Brown Moses/Bellingcat's analysis
There's no need for it. Their track record stands and is known to close observers. Didn't I point you to one of Charles Wood's analysis in the past? And asked you if you ever looked at the stuff with a critical eye yourself? I think so. And nothing came back because as long as your favorite outlets will treat this nonsense as "independent analysis", you'll buy it. Which is kind of sad but won't change anything.
Charles Wood said:I say again about the purpose of this document. It’s not about proving or disproving or rebutting anything. It’s about showing how Bellingcat is fundamentally incompetent at best and quite possibly malevolent at worst.
Still no evidence he's a real forensic specialist. Strikes me more as one of those Birther Adobe analysis types.
Strikes me more as one of those Birther Adobe analysis types.
Apparently, he's "very technical".
Myghty said:To the guys at bellingcat: Please read the tutorials at fotoforensics. And to not make fast assumptions. Especially not in such dangerous and hot political topics. I do not want to judge here, wether the MoD pictures are fake or not. I just want to point out, that from your analysis, it is not possible to determine if at least picture 4 is a fake. I will cover picture 5 in a later blogpost.
The report I linked to didn't rely on any such analysis. It matches a video to where witnesses said it was taken, and not where Russia claimed it was taken.