Kauffer
Master Poster
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2014
- Messages
- 2,382
I have an open mind. You still haven't given me a plausible alibi for your darlings on the murder night, and why their footprints in blood should have been all over the shop.
How do you prove whose prints they were when there are no reference samples for anyone else - boyfriend, two female roommates, to identify just three. And how likely would it be that aaaallll these samples lay in a detection range beyond that of TMB but within that of luminol. Nor do you have any confirmatory testing results actually proving blood exists, which means there is no evidence the luminol was reacting with blood.
So, on the one hand, you ask for proof of innocence, yet on the other you settle for much much less than proof in order to decide upon guilt.
How very very Mensa of you.
'All over the shop' clearly does not include inside Kercher's room.
Last edited: