Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
philkensebben said:
So 50,000 pilots in America know of the consiracy as well? Whats the tally of people who know the 'real story' up to now?

All pilots in the US
NYPD
NYFD
All workers in the WTC's
Jews
Everyone in the government

I'm sure I'm leaving out swathes of the population, but thats a pretty high and ridiculous number already. I feel a bit left out.:(
Click to expand...

What about all the network broadcast techs who are silent about the obvious electronic hijacking of the TV feeds!
 
jaydeehess said:
I drink on the phrase "free fall speed"
Gotta take two drinks if its in bold or caps.:D
Click to expand...

Dave Rogers said:
I've been trying to cut down on my drinking, so now I down a shot of Bourbon every time walkyrie replies to a post.

Dave
Click to expand...

Perhaps I should follow your lead. It would cut my booze bill significantly.

From now on I will only take a drink when bill smith answers my call for him to post the video he said he would.
(I shall never be in danger of a hangover again)
 
NoahFence said:
The point is, claiming small fires because you see a picture of the north side of the building is OLD NEWS. The south side of the building, the one struck by debris from WTC 1 was almost completely engulfed in flames. The thing is, you know that. And you ignore it. Why?
Click to expand...

Images?
 
Clayton Moore said:
Images?
Click to expand...
wtc7fire3.jpg

Big fires. 911 truth likes to compare fires at night to fires in daylight, they like to fool people who are gullible and can't do science.

I only drink when Hi Ho Silver states a fact, or presents evidence; I have been sober for 10 years*! I need to change my drinking game, on 911 issues.


*related to 911 truth claims; warning drinking can be hazardous; omg, are your serious, really serious ...
 
Maybe you could show an image of the WTC 7 raging fire.

The south side of the building, the one struck by debris from WTC 1 was almost completely engulfed in flames.
Click to expand...


beachnut said:
http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/wtc7fire3.jpg
Big fires. 911 truth likes to compare fires at night to fires in daylight, they like to fool people who are gullible and can't do science.

I only drink when Hi Ho Silver states a fact, or presents evidence; I have been sober for 10 years*! I need to change my drinking game, on 911 issues.
Click to expand...


Removed breach of Rule 12 and Rule 0.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Clayton Moore said:
Maybe you could show an image of the WTC 7 raging fire.

...

Edited by LashL: 
Edited.
Click to expand...

Edited by LashL: 
Removed quote of moderated content and response to that part.


If you take your time there are many sources on 911 which could help you refute your failed claims on 911.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/local_links.php?catid=18

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/local_links.php?catid=17

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=82689
 
Last edited by a moderator:
beachnut said:
[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/wtc7fire3.jpg[/qimg]
Big fires. 911 truth likes to compare fires at night to fires in daylight, they like to fool people who are gullible and can't do science.

I only drink when Hi Ho Silver states a fact, or presents evidence; I have been sober for 10 years*! I need to change my drinking game, on 911 issues.
Click to expand...


NIST acknowledged no fires within WTC-7 prior to 12 noon on September 11, 2001. If the Twin Towers had already collapsed over an hour earlier, how did these numerous fires start? Flaming aluminum debris and steel beams ejected 400 feet inside the WTC-7? Or arson fires set by a secret team?

According to NIST: "From 11:30 am to 2:30 pm: no diesel smells reported from the exterior, stairwells or lobby areas. No signs of fire or smoke were reported below the 6th Floor from the exterior, stairwells or lobby areas. In the east stairwell, smoke was observed around Floors 19 or 20, and signs of a fully involved fire on the south side of Floor 23 were heard--seen---smelled from Floor 22. Interviews place a fire on Floor 7 at the west wall, toward the south side, at approximately 12:15 p.m."

So HOW exactly did all those other fires suddenly ignite? If the Twin Towers had already collapsed more than 90 minutes before, how did ejected aluminum debris and steel beams cause several spontaneous fires? And if ejected material did not cause the fires, what did? "There is no visible debris on the roof," NIST stated. So how did so many fires start inside the building---and why didn't an equal number of fires start inside the Verizon or Post Office building?

Soon the fires inside WTC-7 spread in a most haphazard fashion. Almost as if a pyromaniac, or a team of well-trained arsonists, raced from floor to floor. Fires were reported on floors 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14. Floors 19, 21, 22 and 29 also reported fires. Who knew the contents of WTC-7 were so combustable. Curious indeed that the Secret Service occupied floors 9 and 10, while the SEC occupied 11 and 12. Curious indeed.
Click to expand...
http://www.rense.com/general73/okc.htm

Has the old adage, "Now you don't see fire, now you do see fire!" ever been so alarmingly true?
 
Clayton Moore said:
Has the old adage, "Now you don't see fire, now you do see fire!" ever been so alarmingly true?
Click to expand...

Google Search finds no hits for the exact phrase "Now you don't see fire, now you do see fire!"

Physics, pharmacology, folklore - is there anything you actually know something about, and don't just pull out of your ****?

Dave
 
triforcharity said:
Where did you hear that? I have never head that adage ever.

Are you pulling stuff out of your posterior again?
Click to expand...

Now you see it, now you don't.

Now you don't see it, now you do.

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore View Post
Has the old adage, "Now you don't see fire, now you do see fire!" ever been so alarmingly true?
 
Clayton Moore said:
http://www.rense.com/general73/okc.htm

Has the old adage, "Now you don't see fire, now you do see fire!" ever been so alarmingly true?
Click to expand...
Rense.com, the best place for neoNAZIs and idiots to find lies and false information tailored for their delusions. You made an excellent find of woo, rense.com, a place where people go to find dumb stuff. I hope the lies there have not fooled you. In the age of anyone can publish anything of the neo-Modern Internet, you have to exercise judgement. Nice find, excellent example of crazy claims on 911, but skeptics know rense.com is not a reliable source.

Good post, you found a moron who can't figure out 911, an excellent example of crazy 911 truth conspiracy theories on 911. Good find, you are only 5 years late. Wow, 5 year old nonsense. Good that you did not fall for the failed nonsense. 5 years... wow - you are only 5 years behind. What engineering school did you graduate from?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom