Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Personally it sounds like some kid who just found Loose Change and is just parroting it...

yep. he probably just found Loose Change forum, and has come here to spread the new found truth...and convert us all into truthers.

you know, cause no one has ever tried it before. ;)
 
You're assuming he wants to find this information. Supporting and spreading a belief only requires you to say what you think and link to what supports your view.

Add that to a forum of posters who will spend days replying to the stupid instead of ignoring the stupid and bingo....................we have a never ending CT. lol.
 
I'll believe the 1,474 professional Architects and Engineers. Thank you very much. Their scientific evaluation is correct to me.
Even the information published by NIST contradicts government assertions.

Maybe you can, LOL, provide debunker groups with comparative credentials.

Good luck with that.




MilitaryOfficersfor911Trut
Scientistsfor911Truth
FireFightersfor911Truth
Scholarsfor911Truth
Pilotsfor911Truth
Lawyersfor911Truth


AE911Truth
RememberBuilding7
 
Truther Idiocy Number (lets see, Clayton is up to nine posts so) IX.

I'm guessing that Larry Silverstein "pulled" it is next, or maybe pods on the bottom of the plane.

I dunno....I'm going with "bomb at pentagon blasted aircraft debris on the lawn".
 
I'll believe the 1,474 professional Architects and Engineers. Thank you very much. Their scientific evaluation is correct to me.
Even the information published by NIST contradicts government assertions.

Maybe you can, LOL, provide debunker groups with comparative credentials.

Good luck with that.




MilitaryOfficersfor911Trut
Scientistsfor911Truth
FireFightersfor911Truth
Scholarsfor911Truth
Pilotsfor911Truth
Lawyersfor911Truth


AE911Truth
RememberBuilding7

ROFLMAO.

That is your comeback?

You might want to look up these 1400+ "architectural and engineering professionals."

How many peer reviewed engineering journal articles do they have that say NIST is wrong in ANY language, in ANY real peer reviewed journal? (after 9 years the answer is 0)

How many of them have been published stating that NIST is wrong? (none)

I'll take the hundreds of professional engineers at NIST (which has passed peer review).

Have you figured out missing 2.3 trillion?
How about "missing 85 security" tapes?

That would be an argument from authority and it fails when compared to a REAL authority (NIST and bazant)
'
That would be three strikes... you are OUT!!! End of an inning.
 
I'll believe the 1,474 professional Architects and Engineers. Thank you very much. Their scientific evaluation is correct to me.
Even the information published by NIST contradicts government assertions.

Maybe you can, LOL, provide debunker groups with comparative credentials.

Good luck with that.

MilitaryOfficersfor911Trut
Scientistsfor911Truth
FireFightersfor911Truth
Scholarsfor911Truth
Pilotsfor911Truth
Lawyersfor911Truth


AE911Truth
RememberBuilding7

BWhahahaha!!!!

Oh mercy! Great argument from incompetent authority! Half those web sites are defunct, Scholars for 911 Truth are a bunch of No Planers, Pilots for 911 Truth are Pentagon No Planers, and AETruth and Pilots for Twoof are at each others throats!

tell us you weren't aware of that Clayton? Seriously?

Clayton Moore Idiocy Part X, good job big guy!
 
Thanks for the fiction written by whom? Deep Throat?

the funny part is that you didn't even bother to go and read it.

Tsk tsk tsk.

All of the links provided go to primary sources. All of them. Feel free to go and READ them.

Take the time, I'll wait for it.

P.s. deep throat (the source) wasn't fiction, it was fact (which brought down the Nixon presidency) You might want to go back to school. You aren't very good at this are you?
 
I'll believe the 1,474 professional Architects and Engineers. Thank you very much. Their scientific evaluation is correct to me.
Even the information published by NIST contradicts government assertions.

Maybe you can, LOL, provide debunker groups with comparative credentials.

Good luck with that.




MilitaryOfficersfor911Trut
Scientistsfor911Truth
FireFightersfor911Truth
Scholarsfor911Truth
Pilotsfor911Truth
Lawyersfor911Truth


AE911Truth
RememberBuilding7

By the way, they all want a new investigation do they not? I'm willing to send them money!

Maybe you could help me out?
 
I'll believe the 1,474 professional Architects and Engineers. Thank you very much. Their scientific evaluation is correct to me.
Even the information published by NIST contradicts government assertions.

Maybe you can, LOL, provide debunker groups with comparative credentials.

Good luck with that.




MilitaryOfficersfor911Trut
Scientistsfor911Truth
FireFightersfor911Truth
Scholarsfor911Truth
Pilotsfor911Truth
Lawyersfor911Truth


AE911Truth
RememberBuilding7
I'd like to read some of their work. Could you link it for me?

Have you heard of NIST? or WPI?
 
Last edited:
Good grief.

<Random insane claim>
<Link or description of refutation of said claim>
<Request for evidence of claim>
<Ignoring of previous posts, new random insane claim>

I do not see this ending well...
 
There is absolutely no proof that they didn't.

"Geoff Tate" = 9 letters.

"Queensryche" = 11 letters.

9/11

Any questions?

Then there's the lyrics - "The walls you built within, come tumbling down and a new world will begin"

So that means they're also NWO agents!

V for Vendetta, my brotha!
 
Remember Rumsfeld announcing that 2.3 trillion dollars was unaccounted for on September 10, 2001?


Kind of amazing how the pentagon hit conveniently struck the location of the accounting records that showed all those unaccountable trillions of missing dollars that Rumsfeld referenced on 9/10?

Was there an investigation?

Nope.

Could the media's silence be any more defining/deafening?

Here is the speech.........please show where he said 2.3 trillion was MISSING
http://www.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=430

The only thing deafening in the troofer noise with no evidence to back their claims up
 
Good grief.

<Random insane claim>
<Link or description of refutation of said claim>
<Request for evidence of claim>
<Ignoring of previous posts, new random insane claim>

I do not see this ending well...
He hasn't got enough post to link yet. Let us have our fun with this latest "ball of yarn"....... please?
 
I'll believe the 1,474 professional Architects and Engineers. Thank you very much. Their scientific evaluation is correct to me.
Even the information published by NIST contradicts government assertions.

Maybe you can, LOL, provide debunker groups with comparative credentials.

Good luck with that.


So if you had 2000 doctors say take two aspirin to ease the pain, and one said have a lobotomy, you would go with the lobotomy right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom