Wilkerson said, over and over again, that the political persons in charge were incompetant in their positions and in that way and in that way only, culpable in the attacks.
Wilkerson would not agree with any of the conspiracy topics that the interviewer fed him. Case in point is the interviewer bringing up what C.Rice said about her having 54 FBI offices go on heightened alert for terrorist activity. Wilkerson points out that she cannot do that directly, that she can only tell someone who will tell someone else who will tell another person in the FBI to do something. He brings up the fact that the administration was massaging data to try to put a better light on how they had been reacting to AlQada threats when in fact Al Qada was far far down on their political agenda. Its called CYA (you are old enough to know what the acronym stands for), he recounts his disgust for the way the administration behaved, he also states that if he had any thought at any time that these people would have aranged for the attacks to be carried out he would have left the country long ago. It is all of this that constitutes the 60% of the truth that the 911 Commission did not have.
Your twisting of his words in saying that Wilkerson believes that the Commission was 60% wrong is quite telling in how you operate with 'the truth' bill. He actually said that the Commission, and similar commissions do not get to 60% of the whole truth. His whole point in the interview is that it is CYA of incompetance that makes up that 60%.
Wilkerson in NO WAY supports, and in no way does any of his interview, support the contentions that you have promoted in these forums, not MIHOP nor LIHOP.
Did you actually watch the whole interview? I did!
