Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
O!!! Em....geeeeeee... I found another corroded steel piece!!! THERMITE!!!!!!!!!ONE!!!!!

Oh wait... galvanic reaction. Though it almost certainly wasn't the only player in the debris pile we've discussed this in a couple a lectures since our class is literally designing a house that'll be built with some of the same materials (steel and aluminum have been proposed). One of the issues being if the steel and aluminum are put in direct metal to metal contact. In light of this I'm wondering if this is another thing to consider with some of the corrosion examples dug out of the debris piles at GZ.
 
Interesting, I were on a 1 year old ship where the heeling pump started squirting water on me.
The pump housing were bronze, the pipes were iron. There were supposed to be some insulation between them.
 
David Chandler is a physics teacher, a Quaker peace activist, and an independent 9/11 researcher, active with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and on the board of the International Center for 9/11 Studies.
Click to expand...

WTF is this? Let's see, they got a web site........yeah that's a "center".

http://ic911studies.org/Projects.html

"truthers" really don't see this?

:boggled:
 
Last edited:
**** What a mess that was last night huh?

I'll take away a couple of lessons from what happened in "the 43 videos" thread though. Apologies for my part in that BTW.

Anytime there's an urge to derail we should suggest that it should come here. I think this was one of the reasons TAM set up this thread originally.

I am always reluctant to start new threads, the forum is clogged enough as it is, perhaps we can discuss here how to deal with the more persistent trollers? We all know who they are.


Compus
 
CompusMentus said:
**** What a mess that was last night huh?

I'll take away a couple of lessons from what happened in "the 43 videos" thread though. Apologies for my part in that BTW.

Anytime there's an urge to derail we should suggest that it should come here. I think this was one of the reasons TAM set up this thread originally.

I am always reluctant to start new threads, the forum is clogged enough as it is, perhaps we can discuss here how to deal with the more persistent trollers? We all know who they are.


Compus
Click to expand...

I was out of order last night,my apologies too.A sensible discussion about how to deal with the persistent trollers might prove useful.
 
dafydd said:
A sensible discussion about how to deal with the persistent trollers might prove useful.
Click to expand...

OK, a couple points to kick off.

I think the first thing to remember might be not to fall into the trap of replying in kind. I have found myself doing this or being tempted to do this many times.

"Don't feed the troll" is a good addage.

Also we might want to clarify a few things...
How do we publically ID trolls without seeming to be bullying posters? What are the hallmarks of trolling?

Compus
 
First we need to classify the trolls.Second,stop responding,in the hope that they will get fed up and disappear.In the case of Bill,someone always takes the bait.Big mistake.
 
Last edited:
Toke said:
Interesting, I were on a 1 year old ship where the heeling pump started squirting water on me.
The pump housing were bronze, the pipes were iron. There were supposed to be some insulation between them.
Click to expand...

The Historic Ship Nautilus used old bronze valve housings and other types of dissimilar metal objects hung over the outboard side with a small current going through it as a galvanic prevention measure in addition to hull zincs (inside and out). It had to be swapped out every few months due to the corrosion. Better than hauling it into drydock every seven years or less.
 
I see that David Chandler and I are now pretty much on the same page about the top part of WTC1 being merely an assembly of 12 single floors and the the bottom part being a more strongly built assembly of 98 single floors. In other words they destroy each other a floor at a time leaving the top 12 floors gone while 86 floors of the lower assembly still remain in a worst-case scenario.
What would really happen as we should all know intuitively is that the top assembly would fall on the lower assembly causing some local damage to both assemblies and then the collapse would almost immediately arrest leaving the top part again sitting on the lower part that had already carried it for 40 years.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiHeCjZlkr8&feature=player_embedded
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom