Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lupie said:
Bill, I have to hand it to you, you are good for a laugh. You know, if I really had any power, any ability whatsoever to make sure people "stay in the dark", I would magically make your CIT link suddenly disappear. Heck, I'd make the CIT website disappear for that matter. You give me far too much credit Bill, but I do appreciate your generosity.

L.
Click to expand...

No problem. I have plenty more credit to dish out where that came from. Stick around.
 
bill smith said:
Yes I'll have to get back to you on this.
Click to expand...



Shouldn't take you long Bill.

Go to the MyFox site, view the relevant file and then report here what you see.

Sort this out Bill. If the situation was reversed and you (or anyone else) showed me I was wrong I would get myself some gonads and admit it.

You asked for honesty let's see you exhibit such a thing.


Compus
 
CompusMentus said:
Shouldn't take you long Bill.

Go to the MyFox site, view the relevant file and then report here what you see.

Sort this out Bill. If the situation was reversed and you (or anyone else) showed me I was wrong I would get myself some gonads and admit it.

You asked for honesty let's see you exhibit such a thing.


Compus
Click to expand...

Sure...I don't mind admitting that he FOX site shows the helicopter shot. However that is not all there is to it, and on that I'll get back to you. Can't say fairer than that.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Sure...I don't mind admitting that he FOX site shows the helicppter shot. However that is not all there is to it, and on that I'll get back to you. Can't say fairer than that.
Click to expand...



Bill, this is your original post I responded to.



bill smith said:
I am sure he original VHS video is available although it appears that it is being purged from the net. Fortunately the video exists in perhaps mllions of households around the world.

The point s that all the TV companies have put their live broadcast footage on their websites. You will agree that this is part of the immutable physical record of events on 9/11 ? Any significant alteration of that record is a moral outrage if not a flat out crime. . The archive site I link to shows hours of contiguous footage from all the major channels both before the events began and after. All appear to be as broadcat on the day. All except FOX who is the only company to have caught the plane going through the building.

However they have replaced that sequence on their site with other footage shot from the opposite side of the Towers. This is no longer the authentic broadcast and is a clear attempt tp hide the penetraton shot. So I wanted your evaluation of why they did it ?
Click to expand...



When viewing this file at myFOX HERE it is apparent your assertions above are wrong

Fox haven't "purged" the video from the net at all. Fox have the exact, same video of the "nose out" video readily available on one of their sites. Not, as you state, "footage shot from the opposite side of the towers". Bang goes your theory that Fox are attempting to "hide the penetration shot"

There's no get-out clause for you on this one. Honestly and specificity Bill. You asked for it, I gave it. Remember you warned me about obfuscation.


COmpus
 
CompusMentus said:
Bill, this is your original post I responded to.







When viewing this file at myFOX HERE it is apparent your assertions above are wrong

Fox haven't "purged" the video from the net at all. Fox have the exact, same video of the "nose out" video readily available on one of their sites. Not, as you state, "footage shot from the opposite side of the towers". Bang goes your theory that Fox are attempting to "hide the penetration shot"

There's no get-out clause for you on this one. Honestly and specificity Bill. You asked for it, I gave it. Remember you warned me about obfuscation.


COmpus
Click to expand...

Maybe you are right. We will see in due course. In the meantime I just ran across this clip. Quite interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5-xcvv_fRQ
 
bill smith said:
Maybe you are right. We will see in due course. In the meantime I just ran across this clip. Quite interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5-xcvv_fRQ
Click to expand...



"Maybe you are right"? That's what passes for honesty in your neck of the woods? The due course has been chased Bill. You came last.

As for the clip, my opinion is that it's all pure amateurish conjecture based on a highly compressed, badly pixellated, zoom shot. Take a look at the other videos available of the same impact. Some of much better quality and vantage. Were they "faked" too?


Compus
 
CompusMentus said:
"Maybe you are right"? That's what passes for honesty in your neck of the woods? The due course has been chased Bill. You came last.

As for the clip, my opinion is that it's all pure amateurish conjecture based on a highly compressed, badly pixellated, zoom shot. Take a look at the other videos available of the same impact. Some of much better quality and vantage. Were they "faked" too?


Compus
Click to expand...

Have you got the links ? I could use some better quality ones.
 
Edited by Locknar: 
Breach of Membership Agreement removed

You have been given them repeatedly.
Look up
this is an orange by alan lawson.
and nose in engine out by 9/11 truthinator on youtube.

Let's keep it civil.....
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Locknar
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not quite sure... would this count as a stundie?

weirdh.png


This guy just had a massive mental breakdown on me, and he now is convinced that I'm the Director.
 
bill smith said:
Nah...the assumption now is that the videos have been doctored. In fact it's turning into a dead give away that 9/11 was an inside job.

You see at best we have a couple of dozen cameras that do not provide audio of explosions and yet we have absolutely hundreds of anecdotal reports of explosions from every kind of eyewitness.I hardly know of any eyewitness that does not report explosions from TV crews to first responders to civilians.. If you like I can provide you with literally hundreds upon hundreds of references.
Click to expand...

They don't report explosions. They say the collapse sounded like explosions. It's called using a simile.

Noone heard explosions and saw flashes and then saw a collapse a second later. In all the youtube videos you've watched, haven't you ever seen a real demoliton?
 
Looking for cites for what was in the WTC dust cloud

I'm looking for links to papers that describe what was in the "pyroclastic" cloud at WTC on 9/11. I know I saw something here recently but somehow forgot to bookmark it.
 
orphia nay said:
They don't report explosions. They say the collapse sounded like explosions. It's called using a simile.

Noone heard explosions and saw flashes and then saw a collapse a second later. In all the youtube videos you've watched, haven't you ever seen a real demoliton?
Click to expand...

You don't expect Truthers to understand what simile means,do you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom