Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
CompusMentus said:
OK. So the only question is "Is this the original footage?"

I can't state whether it is with utmost certainty. I haven't checked it out. Do you think it's original? It does "look" legit to me.


Compus
Click to expand...

When you say 'legit' you mean that is what you would expect to see when a plane struck the Tower ?

By the way, as I said earlier this is the authentic footage. I saw it myself.
 
bill smith said:
When you say 'legit' you mean that is what you would expect to see when a plane struck the Tower ?

By the way, as I said earlier this is the authentic footage. I saw it myself.
Click to expand...
Just to say. What makes you think anyone would have any idea what a plane hitting the towers "should" look like? What would they base this on (movies).
 
DGM said:
Just to say. What makes you think anyone would have any idea what a plane hitting the towers "should" look like? What would they base this on (movies).
Click to expand...

What are you DGM?...A 'Minder' or something ? lol
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Why don't you DGM ? They are more your type of people.
Click to expand...
"My type of people"? :confused:

It's not really a concern of mine. Your the one with the question, don't you want an answer? I always find the best way to find the answers is to go to the source. Do you expect others to do your work?
 
DGM said:
OK.:confused:

I think Compus (if that's who you mean) can handle himself. Care to answer my question?

Didn't think I'd see the dodge?
Click to expand...

Well you were trying to preempt any surprises I might drop on Compus. hat is called 'minding' .
 
bill smith said:
When you say 'legit' you mean that is what you would expect to see when a plane struck the Tower ?

By the way, as I said earlier this is the authentic footage. I saw it myself.
Click to expand...



OK. I'll take your word for it that this is authentic.

Yes, what I see in that video is how I expect it would look like. As DGM writes though my experience of such an event is limited to the singular.

It's quite badly pixellated, due to data compression I should think. Which makes it a little difficult to analyse. Do you know of a better copy?

Now, have you got a specific point you want to address?

Compus
 
DGM said:
No, your just so obvious it pitiful. Care to answer the question?
Click to expand...

You were clearly afraid that I am going to force some kind of admission from Compus . That's why you were prompting and leaking so liberally. I think you are the one who is very obvious.
 
bill smith said:
You were clearly afraid that I am going to force some kind of admission from Compus . That's why you were prompting and leaking so liberally. I think you are the one who is very obvious.
Click to expand...
Wow!!!!!!!

Maybe I should just PM him the answers so you won't catch on.:rolleyes:




No answering the question, huh? Maybe I should tell Compus to ask it.:eek:
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
Wow!!!!!!!
Maybe I should just PM him the answers so you won't catch on.:rolleyes:
No answering the question, huh? Maybe I should tell Compus to ask it.:eek:
Click to expand...



Why do I feel like I'm watching a movie and someone tells you there's a twist.


Compus
 
CompusMentus said:
OK. I'll take your word for it that this is authentic.

Yes, what I see in that video is how I expect it would look like. As DGM writes though my experience of such an event is limited to the singular.

It's quite badly pixellated, due to data compression I should think. Which makes it a little difficult to analyse. Do you know of a better copy?

Now, have you got a specific point you want to address?

Compus
Click to expand...

I am sure he original VHS video is available although it appears that it is being purged from the net. Fortunately the video exists in perhaps mllions of households around the world.

The point s that all the TV companies have put their live broadcast footage on their websites. You will agree that this is part of the immutable physical record of events on 9/11 ? Any significant alteration of that record is a moral outrage if not a flat out crime. . The archive site I link to shows hours of contiguous footage from all the major channels both before the events began and after. All appear to be as broadcat on the day. All except FOX who is the only company to have caught the plane going through the building.

However they have replaced that sequence on their site with other footage shot from the opposite side of the Towers. This is no longer the authentic broadcast and is a clear attempt tp hide the penetraton shot. So I wanted your evaluation of why they did it ?

This is the TV archive of 9/i1. Check out FOX for the impact on WTC2 at about 9:02
http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive 9/11TV Arhive.


The real original footge of the plane appearing to go through the building.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cvWwIxMbmE The real original footage
 
DGM said:
I really wish this "movie" had a plot. :D
Click to expand...



I think I see what you mean, the non-plot hasn't thickened at all, it's about as thin as dishwater.

BTW don't worry about me, I've been lurking on JREF long enough. I've seen it all.


Compus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom