Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
TruthersLie said:
9/11 Chewie...

umm I hate to say this.. but there is no "official report." There is no Official theory.

There is the common narrative agreed upon by 98% of the world that 19 islamic terrorists hijacked 4 jets, flew 3 of them into buildings and crashed the other one in a field in penn.

There are several investigative reports which were gathered by various government agencies, but there is no "official report."
Click to expand...

Well since NIST, Civil & Strcutrual Engineers & the Gov. Agencies concluded in the 9/11 Commission that the evidence out-weighs the Conspiracy Theories.

If that's not an Official Report then we'd better start believeing the Truthers!

That's just my opinion!
 
Let's keep it civil....and use member names correctly. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Posted By: Locknar


Billy Bob is just a nick name Locknar. I've got nick names all over the internet. I am being civil here, see the fine points I made to Bill Smith?

Humor's what I do, along with education.
 
bill smith outraged? Could have fooled me. This is the person who, when just a newbie on this forum, claimed to be in absolutely no rush to expose the truth behind 9/11 ("slowlee-slowlee-catcha-da-monkee").
 
9/11ChewbaccaDefense said:
Well since NIST, Civil & Strcutrual Engineers & the Gov. Agencies concluded in the 9/11 Commission that the evidence out-weighs the Conspiracy Theories.

If that's not an Official Report then we'd better start believeing the Truthers!

That's just my opinion!
Click to expand...

TruthersLie is quite correct.

Your "opinion" is just flat out wrong.
 
bill smith said:
Why are you on this forum at all Dave ? I mean I have the excuse of being somebody who is outraged and scandalised that the American government could have murdered 3,000 of it's own citizens- but you- you are a world reknowned British physicist and author.
Click to expand...

One of the reasons I'm here is to watch the amazing spectacle of you applying runaway feature creep to the other posters. It's one of the eternal, unanswerable questions; why is the universe here, is there life after death, is there a teapot in orbit around Jupiter, and why does bill smith overinflate the importance of everybody he talks to?

bill smith said:
I cannot see any reason why you would be here almost every day for years on end fighting for the government version of 9/11. It's not really canny whichever way I look at it.
Click to expand...

Look at it in terms of cost/benefit analysis. The cost of being wrong here is huge; I could, quite literally, be risking execution if you and your movement somehow came to a position where you were running the world. The benefit is small; I've learned some interesting things about structural engineering, aerodynamics and criminal investigation, but on the whole it's no more than a passing amusement. So, take the ratio of cost to benefit, invert it, and that's still significantly greater than my perception of the possibility you could be right. It's a very, very, very, very small number.

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
Wow, three years ago. So how did that mainstream political reality turn out for you? Have there been any major political events - elections, say - in the meantime by which you could gauge the importance of the issue? If so, how much of a role did the issue play?

Oh, yes. I forgot. None whatsoever.
Click to expand...

Yep.

2006 was when Da Twoof got as big as it was ever going to get. It's been all downhill from there.

The only blip on the political radar for 9/11 Twoof was when Van Jones was outed as a former/unwitting twoofer. Yep, that moment went REALLY well for the movement. :oldroll: :D
 
There's some pretty good amusement value in this thread over at Truth Action. By way of background, somebody asked David Ray Grifter about LIHOP versus MIHOP, and Griffin's reply was that nobody could be seriously LIHOP anymore, now that controlled demolition was an established fact. Jon Gold prefers to play the "we're just asking questions" and "air quality" dodgeball, although of course he doesn't really mean it. Those are just tactics to draw people in. But Gold is pretty candid in his responses like these:

How many people came to the NYC CAN march? 100-150? How many people live in New York City? 9 Million?

On 9/11/2006, we had what I would suspect is 5,000 people. This past anniversary, there was 100-200...
Click to expand...

And Zombie Bill Hicks notes:

One controversial "peer reviewed" paper in a compromised vanity journal has turned the truth movement into an evangelical wall.
Click to expand...

Wow. We may actually be getting through to some of the less deluded.
 
Dave Rogers said:
[...] and why does bill smith overinflate the importance of everybody he talks to?
Click to expand...


bill smith must be very small indeed if he considers educated and experienced members of this forum to be "world-renowned" and everyone else who opposes him to be in the employ of some evil government.

It must be an amazing feat of courage for him to merely wake up in the morning, knowing what he must face.
 
Last edited:
CIT. Rigor mortis.

(As predicted in post #1500) No input for 3 whole days now at the CIT forum.



344914aef465240d15.jpg





When do I get the $1,000,000?


Compus
 
Last edited:
Funny how the "report" part of his website has been "under construction" since June 7. It's almost as if he knows no one gives a **** about his stupid website.
 
Last edited:
Looking for re-post of close-up pics of GZ

Once in a while some posts large, close-up pictures of the rubble pile and the trucks and cranes. I can't find my link, now when I need it. Can someone post something?

Thanks.
 
BigAl said:
Can someone post something?
Thanks.
Click to expand...



I have a lot of GZ pics like that. This one was over 1500 pxls width (resample to comply with Jref image limits) You can have everything I have, PM me we could work it out.



344914af4155e01143.jpg



Compus
 
Last edited:
"Thinking Aloud"

I was musing about the evidence (for thermite/mate nano super nano whatever) claimed to have been discovered (after scientific testing) by certain truthers in a sample of dust taken from the area around GZ post-9/11.

Forgive my "laymanese" and feel free to shoot me down.

I'm sure it would be fairly straightforward to perform similar tests on dust collected after a future "conventional" demolition of a building that contained similar construction materials to the towers. If, as I suspect, the dust examination would show similar findings in composition this might put the thermite theories to bed.

Has this been done before?

Compus
 
CompusMentus said:
I was musing about the evidence (for thermite/mate nano super nano whatever) claimed to have been discovered (after scientific testing) by certain truthers in a sample of dust taken from the area around GZ post-9/11.

Forgive my "laymanese" and feel free to shoot me down.

I'm sure it would be fairly straightforward to perform similar tests on dust collected after a future "conventional" demolition of a building that contained similar construction materials to the towers. If, as I suspect, the dust examination would show similar findings in composition this might put the thermite theories to bed.

Has this been done before?

Compus
Click to expand...

I don't know if that has been done before, but it sounds reasonable, and feasable. However, the results would never be acceptable to the troofers if those results contradict their "theories". Actual scientific testing and unbiased examination of evidence is unacceptable, and is not practiced or allowed in the Cult of 9/11 Truth.

L.
 
Last edited:
BigAl said:
Once in a while some posts large, close-up pictures of the rubble pile and the trucks and cranes. I can't find my link, now when I need it. Can someone post something?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

This one?

5277x.jpg

911_devistation2-1.jpg


Or that one? I think I got those both from you anyway
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom