Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
What do you call it?; you spew so many delusions and lies which one is this?

How would you interpret somebody taking the antidote to a deadly spore a full week before that spore was unexpectedly used for the first time in US history ?
 
How would you interpret somebody taking the antidote to a deadly spore a full week before that spore was unexpectedly used for the first time in US history ?
Who took it? Does the military take it? Why? What day was it? What year was it?

Do you do any rational posting? Why is 911 truth unable to answer any questions? Got some more dirt dumb delusions? Any new ones?
 
How would you interpret somebody taking the antidote to a deadly spore a full week before that spore was used for the first time in US history?


At best: That, like someone else said, they certainly didn't know if they would be targeted. Therefore, it wasn't something they planned.

There may have been threats made that we aren't aware of.

But I guess that is all part of their evil scheme's plausible deniability, right?


Which would be completely undermined by the fact that they took the Cipro. Heh.
 
At best: That, like someone else said, they certainly didn't know if they would be targeted. Therefore, it wasn't something they planned.

There may have been threats made that we aren't aware of.

Which would be completely undermined by the fact that they took the Cipro. Heh.

Okay. What were these unaware threats? Wouldn't they have been made public by now? So just how many completely unspecific, never done before threats did they take precautions for? And just who advised them to take these precautions on these possible, completely unspecific, never done before threats? One threat that somehow came true a couple weeks later. A threat that turned out to have an origin from one of our own government labs. No matter what you believe, were the Anthrax attacks an inside job or not?
 
What were these unaware threats?


...really? You actually asked that question?

Wouldn't they have been made public by now?


Maybe. Personally, I think they would have been, but I am not and was not privy to the inner workings of the administration and the information they had available. The investigation is still in progress, though, so... maybe not.

My suggestion was merely hypothetical, anyway. Don't get your diaper in a knot.

So just how many completely unspecific, never done before threats did they take precautions for?


"[N]ever done before"? You're not implying this is a valid reason for ignoring a threat, are you?

And just who advised them to take these precautions on these possible, completely unspecific, never done before threats?


Heh. There's that phrase again. Anyway...

  • Early September: "Some White House personnel" are given ciprofloxacin, the antibiotic of choice for anthrax, for undisclosed reasons.Source
  • September 11: Staff accompanying Vice President Cheney to Camp David following the World Trade Center attacks are dispensed ciprofloxacin by the White House Medical Office as "a precaution."Source
  • "Soon after September 11", Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen is advised "in a roundabout way from a high government official" to acquire ciprofloxacin.Source


  • (I'd like to point out that, although I haven't looked deeply, I've seen no evidence that anyone in the administration received Cipro before 9/11. I think someone mentioned that earlier in the thread.)

    One threat that somehow came true a couple weeks later.


    I'm not sure what your point is. Assuming there were threats made, do you actually find it suspicious that precautions were taken and that the threat actually was carried out?

    Again, I have no real reason to believe there were threats made. You nutters like to believe They™ are keeping things--sometimes very minor things--from Us™. I was offering a hypothesis along those lines.

    A threat that turned out to have an origin from one of our own government labs. No matter what you believe, were the Anthrax attacks an inside job or not?


    In the most narrow definition of the phrase? Sure. The problem for you is that no one, not even the government, is denying that.
 
Last edited:
(off-topic post)

On another board, our resident narcissist posted a thread proclaiming he needed to raise $2000 to produce his Grammy award winning cd. His arrogance pissed me off enough, to show him you can make a song with $0...with nothing but a computer, and a $10 mic, and some free software.

It's a trance song...like all those kids dance to on x at a rave...but the message holds true for 9/11 truth. So Ladies and Gentleman..my first video.. "Ain't Gonna Win A Grammy"

Ain't Gonna Win a Grammy
 
(off-topic post)

On another board, our resident narcissist posted a thread proclaiming he needed to raise $2000 to produce his Grammy award winning cd. His arrogance pissed me off enough, to show him you can make a song with $0...with nothing but a computer, and a $10 mic, and some free software.

It's a trance song...like all those kids dance to on x at a rave...but the message holds true for 9/11 truth. So Ladies and Gentleman..my first video.. "Ain't Gonna Win A Grammy"

Ain't Gonna Win a Grammy

I don't think it's possible to be off topic in this thread.

I like the music.

I made one that was less musical, but more Truthy:
 
I had to read all 12 pages of lixluke

(off-topic post)

On another board, our resident narcissist posted a thread proclaiming he needed to raise $2000 to produce his Grammy award winning cd. His arrogance pissed me off enough, to show him you can make a song with $0...with nothing but a computer, and a $10 mic, and some free software.

It's a trance song...like all those kids dance to on x at a rave...but the message holds true for 9/11 truth. So Ladies and Gentleman..my first video.. "Ain't Gonna Win A Grammy"

Ain't Gonna Win a Grammy

I hate you for posting that thread.
 
So any sign of the new pdoh or HI socks yet? It has been several days since pdoh's latest was banned, and over a week for the last HI one.

TAM:)
 
Yes, this place is dead without them, after all, they account for about 80 per cent of all truther posts.
 
Met my first truther in real life today

I was riding the bus home from work, and was sitting in the very back seat. I heard someone speaking quite loudly at the very front of the bus, so I piqued an ear. I heard "mumble mumble..free fall speed...mumble mumble false flag." The tale tell signs of 9/11 truth. So I got up and moved to the front of the bus. Unfortunately, the next stop was his, so I didn't get to speak with him. The woman sitting next to me was smiling at what the truther was saying, so I turned to her and said "I've never met a 9/11 truther in real life..I thought they only existed on the internet." She replied "a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing".

I've seen the guy around the neighborhood quite a bit. He used to come to my bar a long time ago. Maybe I'll run in to him again on the bus.
 
Last edited:
So any sign of the new pdoh or HI socks yet? It has been several days since pdoh's latest was banned, and over a week for the last HI one.

TAM:)

We have a new member 911amanda. I always get a bad feeling with members who have '911' in their names.

I was riding the bus home from work, and was sitting in the very back seat. I heard someone speaking quite loudly at the very front of the bus, so I piqued an ear. I heard "mumble mumble..free fall speed...mumble mumble false flag." The tale tell signs of 9/11 truth. So I got up and moved to the front of the bus. Unfortunately, the next stop was his, so I didn't get to speak with him. The woman sitting next to me was smiling at what the truther was saying, so I turned to her and said "I've never met a 9/11 truther in real life..I thought they only existed on the internet." She replied "a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing".

I've seen the guy around the neighborhood quite a bit. He used to come to my bar a long time ago. Maybe I'll run in to him again on the bus.

I've yet to meet my first
 
Last edited:
We have a new member 911amanda. I always get a bad feeling with members who have '911' in their names.



I've yet to meet my first

lol...using a girl's name might be a silly sexist ploy to have us go "easier" on him...

Interesting.

TAM:)
 
"There are no girls on the internet" is my default position. In other words I treat everyone the same so if you say something stupid I'm going to point it out.
 
'' 1027 architectural and engineering professionals
and 6394 other supporters including A&E students
have signed the petition demanding of Congress
a truly independent investigation.
''


So is ae911truth.org now unstoppable ?​

''
Jan 26, 2010
Sunstein and Beck Fire Shots Across Our Bow
— Gregg Roberts

Officials, journalists, activists say 9/11 truth activists pose a violent threat; call for secret government disruption of our work – or worse

Note: This article addresses issues that arguably lie outside AE911Truth's mission. We consider such a departure to be justified in this case, because the paper by Sunstein and Vermeule specifically mentioned as the targets of its advocated "infiltration," the 16% of Americans who responded to a Scripps-Howard Poll in 2006 that it was either very likely or somewhat likely that "the collapse of the twin towers in New York was aided by explosives secretly planted in the two buildings" (Conspiracy Theories, p. 2).

You know you're getting somewhere on an issue of paramount public importance when your opponents stop making fun of you and start describing you as a threat to the established order, and supporting interference with or the elimination of your First Amendment rights, and even accuse you of being a terrorist.''

Read on...
http://www.ae911truth.org/info/154

ref: www.ae911truth.org

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win" - Mahatma Gandhi.
 
Last edited:
You know you're getting somewhere on an issue of paramount public importance when your opponents stop making fun of you and start describing you as a threat to the established order, and supporting interference with or the elimination of your First Amendment rights, and even accuse you of being a terrorist.''

.

Your problem is, we are still making fun of you. Let me know when that stops. :)
 
trutherslie:

Your last post (#474 I believe) in the "Jones Paper" thread, was awesome. Take him to school and give him a can of whoopass. I am congratulating you here, as I do not think congrats would make it through the moderation of that particular thread.

TAM:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom