• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Contact: Ph.D. Steven E. Jones-Litigation

To be fair IMDB should not be used to determine crew on films. Their lists are incomplete to say the very least. I only appear listed on two films on IMDB - there's a lot of films I have worked on which don't mention me.

One of the films I worked on lists only 46 crew members, despite have a main unit on-set crew bigger than this.

-Gumboot

Thank you for your post. I am too new and uninformed on all the players here to know all the details of each poster. Sorry for that. I will learn.

How wonderful to run into someone in the same field. Your point is of course excellent as well as being timely. My first FX gig was 'Alien 1'. Ridley Scott was with his girlfriend at the NASA Kennedy Space Center (NASA-KSC) and saw my work and wanted to know through my director at the time, Bob Schulman,

http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2004/mar/HQ_04099_Shulman.html

My dear friend and mentor, if I would be interested in digital work for him on a movie he was planning called 'Alien'. He put me in touch with him and from there they all got me in touch with Apple Computer for software I would need to learn to animate. It was tough. Hard learning curve, which you know.

But I learned from Ridley and others that often times you will not get credit in credit roll, and if you are a free agent you will not be listed at FX databases. But the up side is that you get more work.

Great post and please explain more on your end of the game.

Thank you,

RAMS
 
But what happens if that is illegal if proven cause is established in 'any' court of law regarding injurious slander.


The result you envision is legally impossible. It is not just difficult, there aren't just roadblocks - it cannot happen. It would rank in difficulty with a goat conceiving through normal means and giving birth to Albert Brooks. It is not achievable in this universe.

Whatever 'alarms' are going off among anyone herein this forum, escapes me


You have misrepresented yourself as having access to a space telescope to read license plates. You have misrepresented yourself as having degrees in "structural failure, "mechanical failure," and "advanced visual interpretation." You have made claims about the workings of the Hubble Space Telescope that are not true. You have demonstrated an utter lack of understanding of the law. You have posted an email to Dr. Jones which was incomprehensible. Several years ago, you found yourself similarly enmeshed with UFO enthusiasts. You misrepresented the outcome of that case. You have admitted to being bipolar.

If there is a family member whom you usually trust, please call them and ask for help today.
 
This is the 2nd mail sent to Dr. Jones and this site:
stj911@gmail.com

http://stj911.org/

"Dr, Jones,

I would wish to join your site.

I am slowly preparing a class action lawsuit of some large sum,

Not going after st911.org then Rams?
Why not?

They're the ones claiming it was a space beam-weapon - that would surely be an accusation against NASA wouldn't it?
Why aren't you defending NASA Rams?
 
Not going after st911.org then RAMS?
Why not?

Scooby, read the thread and then kindly piss off, okay?

Edit to add: Okay, you edited your post to add more after I first wrote this, but the above still stands. Read the thread and then kindly piss off, okay?
 
Last edited:
I must say RAMS has a grandiose plan.

This thread is one of many I am glad we have Loss Leader and LashL posting here.

It worries me, RAMS, that you repeatedly use the term 'Reap the Whirlwind' in a way that echoes Art Bell's 'I am vengeance'.

While others see good intentions, I also see revenge.

It also worries me that you request to join Steven Jones' organisation. I see no reason for this other than thought disorder.
 
Scooby, read the thread and then kindly piss off, okay?

Edit to add: Okay, you edited your post to add more after I first wrote this, but the above still stands. Read the thread and then kindly piss off, okay?

I am reading the thread - and replying to the initial post.
Might I take this lowbrow opportunity, to reply in kind and suggest you go ;) yourself?
 
I am reading the thread - and replying to the initial post.
Might I take this lowbrow opportunity, to reply in kind and suggest you go ;) yourself?

Sure, go ahead. You're pretty good at lowbrow, it seems. And it is obvious that you are not busily reading the thread as you suggest, since if you were, you would still be reading it rather than replying to my much later post, but nice try. And I am not in the habit of winking at myself, so I will respectfully decline your invitation to do so.
 
Last edited:
I must say RAMS has a grandiose plan.

This thread is one of many I am glad we have Loss Leader and LashL posting here.

It worries me, RAMS, that you repeatedly use the term 'Reap the Whirlwind' in a way that echoes Art Bell's 'I am vengeance'.

While others see good intentions, I also see revenge.

It also worries me that you request to join Steven Jones' organisation. I see no reason for this other than thought disorder.



What a bizarre thought and post. Have you considered that in the midst of strange places, one learns the enemy better than afar.

I intended to join to see what they would do as I reponded in kind to what they espouse, in civil order.

Just like I did for 3 days at LC. It puts the money where their mouth is, so to speak. I still plan to join in great fervor.

duh......

jeezzzzzzzz...........


RAMS
 
Robert,

Edited to remove my question about the Navy Seals. I found the answer on Robert's own site.


By the way, excellent art work on your site Robert.

What was your FX role for the film Aliens? I thought most of the alien scenes were animatronic.
 
Last edited:
Hi, Robert.
I admire your determination to defend those who are disparaged by 9/11 conspiracists. However, I'm concerned that you may not be following sound legal advice. I'm not a lawyer. Just my two bits.
 
Not going after st911.org then Rams?
Why not?

They're the ones claiming it was a space beam-weapon - that would surely be an accusation against NASA wouldn't it?
Why aren't you defending NASA Rams?
Scooby, NASA has space beam weapons?
 
Robert,

Edited to remove my question about the Navy Seals. I found the answer on Robert's own site.


By the way, excellent art work on your site Robert.

What was your FX role for the film Aliens? I thought most of the alien scenes were animatronic.



Thank you.

Everything you see on the net as attacks of my person is from the ilk of Strange 1, ala Art Bell and minions. He would actually direct people what to do from his radio show to me, and I would have my websites. Rough stuff. Hilarious stuff, if you have the stamina to take it. I like it since I am impervious to it.

Alien: this was one of the first uses of primitive CGI. I was very immature in its use and the learning curve was almost impossible for me. I am a Apple man for some 27 years, but Apple's Renderman is and was tough for me. 90% of Aliens 1 was animatronics. You are correct.

This below is a movie still of a finished CGI that was clipped in the editing room in place of a animatronic from Alien 1

gore.jpg


And on the topic of what Bell did to me, it is starting even within this new place, from the allies themselves. That is sound however, and no problem.

We will see as this entrains what effect it will have.

Here, look at this:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Art+Bell+attacks+on+Robert+Stephens&btnG=Google+Search

Imagine living with that and trying to make a living too.


RAMS
 
Those individuals which have been personally threatened or personally damaged by slander or libel from any individual no matter what "Strange" they belong to should seek the advice of an attorney- not the other way around.



They have, and they are going for restitution.

RAMS
 
Hi, Robert.
I admire your determination to defend those who are disparaged by 9/11 conspiracists. However, I'm concerned that you may not be following sound legal advice. I'm not a lawyer. Just my two bits.



Why? Explain please.

Thanks in advance.

RAMS
 
The result you envision is legally impossible. It is not just difficult, there aren't just roadblocks - it cannot happen. It would rank in difficulty with a goat conceiving through normal means and giving birth to Albert Brooks. It is not achievable in this universe.




You have misrepresented yourself as having access to a space telescope to read license plates. You have misrepresented yourself as having degrees in "structural failure, "mechanical failure," and "advanced visual interpretation." You have made claims about the workings of the Hubble Space Telescope that are not true. You have demonstrated an utter lack of understanding of the law. You have posted an email to Dr. Jones which was incomprehensible. Several years ago, you found yourself similarly enmeshed with UFO enthusiasts. You misrepresented the outcome of that case. You have admitted to being bipolar.

If there is a family member whom you usually trust, please call them and ask for help today.



Interesting post. I have no comment. BTW, I am not involved in any conspiracy, as a gentle reminder. I suggest you perhaps consult the Behold website url in the signature below and study the links and the contact points.

Thank you none the less for taking the time to respond, however,.........whomever you are.

RAMS
 
What a bizarre thought and post. Have you considered that in the midst of strange places, one learns the enemy better than afar.

I intended to join to see what they would do as I reponded in kind to what they espouse, in civil order.

Just like I did for 3 days at LC. It puts the money where their mouth is, so to speak. I still plan to join in great fervor.

duh......

jeezzzzzzzz...........

RAMS
Robert, if I had an organization, and you told me that you wanted to join it, and that you wanted to sue me, I wouldn't let you join.

Call me crazy.
 
The result you envision is legally impossible. It is not just difficult, there aren't just roadblocks - it cannot happen. It would rank in difficulty with a goat conceiving through normal means and giving birth to Albert Brooks. It is not achievable in this universe.

You have misrepresented yourself as having access to a space telescope to read license plates. You have misrepresented yourself as having degrees in "structural failure, "mechanical failure," and "advanced visual interpretation." You have made claims about the workings of the Hubble Space Telescope that are not true. You have demonstrated an utter lack of understanding of the law. You have posted an email to Dr. Jones which was incomprehensible. Several years ago, you found yourself similarly enmeshed with UFO enthusiasts. You misrepresented the outcome of that case. You have admitted to being bipolar.

If there is a family member whom you usually trust, please call them and ask for help today.
I apparently have some catching up to do with this subject! I'll refrain from posting again until I do that.

Then again, I think I'll just let it be.
 
I have the ability and software to resolve through HST a license plate number on a car at 100 miles from low earth orbit. I can resolve if there was issues of malice concerning 911 day or missing visual data, along with professional analysis of same.

Oh. Robert, my best guess is that you are suffering from delusions. Good luck.
 

Back
Top Bottom