• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Considerable videos...

The search function is slow and failing me. But IIRC, the thing of note was that the reactions of the cameraman and people, especially the firefighters, were not to an explosion but to each other.
 
I've seen this video (or at least the first part) discussed before. There's some discussion on this thread (starting at post #45). See especially Gumboot's post #60 and that links to more discussion on this thread after post #211:

gumboot said:
This is probably the most concise summary of my conclusions, after running the video through editing software to have a look at it:

gumboot said:
It doesn't. The sound is fake. It has been added. The fireman in question says "I know that, but you gotta get back, the city's exploded."

The people present talk over the explosion, as if it had never happened. In addition, the explosion is heard most clearly in the low frequency range and upper range. The volume levels for the explosion are well below all other sound in the area - the voices of the people peak frequently and yet the only peaking on the explosion is below 60 Hz.

The lower end could be explained by a distant explosion, however the high-volume upper end indicates close proximity to the explosion. Consumer handycams have very poor performance at the lower end of the audio range, and professional cameras are equipped with shotgun microphones designed specifically to pick up human voices.

There is no echo on the explosion - and yet it supposedly occured in a crowded city - which produces multiple echos.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
It's funny to watch someone who has discovered a youtube video for the very first time act as if no one else has seen this video either. Because it makes perfect sense that the case-cracker for the biggest conspiracy in history spends years sitting dormant on youtube waiting for the right genius to come along and unlock its hidden clues.
 
JonathanClement said:
Did you watch the whole video?
Click to expand...
Did anyone live through 9/11? What is your point? What is your take? Just presenting a video seems a waste without some analysis in the OP.

If you were awake on 9/11 you have seen all this junk. If you took a break and had to work, then you were spared the endless bs from the news trying to find something ever other minute, every other day. The explosives are news bs junk, and false. The video is lame, made up to fool idiots who want to believe stupid CT tripe.

Since the terrorist picked planes to impact buildings, why risk 9/11 with stupid explosives? We were looking for idiots trying to bomb the towers, not planes.

Thanks for brining up the video and trying to waste another hour on this old junk, but it is lame, and the news programs had you leaping before you looked all day.

Here is the key to explosives. If 9/11 was done with explosives, there would be evidence of blown up people. There are none.

Bingo; bs
 
Last edited:
Is there a way to tell the difference from burned bodies and blown up bodies at the ground zero pile.
 
yup. I cleaned up many an IED site in Iraq to tell you what a blown up body versus a burnt body looks like
 
What's "considerable" about them? They're of considerably poor quality, if that's what you mean.
 
johnny karate said:
It's funny to watch someone who has discovered a youtube video for the very first time act as if no one else has seen this video either. Because it makes perfect sense that the case-cracker for the biggest conspiracy in history spends years sitting dormant on youtube waiting for the right genius to come along and unlock its hidden clues.
Click to expand...

Well put, sir, well put. Let me also point out that it makes perfect sense that the very same NWO that was able to get away with blowing up one big and two enormous office towers in downtown Manhattan, cannot remove a video from youtube.
 
JonathanClement said:
Okay, here's a thread to post videos that are convincing. Here's one:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw

What's your take on this vid? Esspecially the first part that contains the explosion?
Click to expand...

This is what I love about twoofers. Mainstream Corporate Control Media are all lying shills engaging in wide-scale censorship... except in the heat of the moment on 9/11, when they were telling the God's honest truth about secondary explosions and then they had to have their testimony silenced... but they did a lousy job of trying to memory-hole it and it's leaked to approximately 7000 HAY GUISE DEY SAID BOMB ON TEEVEE ON 9/11 DAT MEANS DERE WUR BOMBS AT WTC DUH INSIDE JOB WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!11!!! youtube videos.

1337m3n's video is a far more reputable and solid representation. Thank you, sir.
 
How come these alleged explosions were not heard just before or during the collapse of all 3 [emphasis added ala Mr. Gage] high-rise skyscrapers?
 
kookbreaker said:
The search function is slow and failing me. But IIRC, the thing of note was that the reactions of the cameraman and people, especially the firefighters, were not to an explosion but to each other.
Click to expand...

how should they have reacted?
 
JonathanClement said:
Okay, here's a thread to post videos that are convincing. Here's one:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw

What's your take on this vid? Esspecially the first part that contains the explosion?
Click to expand...

The original of that tape with the firemen talking on the phone has been located. The explosion was added into the scene. An analysis was provided demonstrating that the explosion was not recorded with the same microphone. All of this was done on this site within the last two months.

It is 100% fake.

I stopped watching it because it is fake.

FAKE.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom