pipelineaudio
Philosopher
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2006
- Messages
- 5,092
the day Harass was "officially" changed to sound like Harris would be a good start
With all due respect and I mean that sincerely. This seems to me to be sticking your head in the sand. To pretend that there isn't an attempt to control speech by labeling some speech as hate speech or to enforce norms on what words can and can't be used is to ignore the fact that these things do exist.
I don't like getting rid of words or terms. The answer to bad speech is good speech and not simply getting rid of the speech that we don't like.
Give me another term that others will understand and I will use it. Until then I only need use the word and explain the context in which I use it. It is effective and appropriate in my opinion. I don't deny that the term is problematic but here you are making the term itself politically incorrect. I hope you appreciate the irony.
Thats the thing, I would say that it isnt even a question of feeling but in fact a political system which says you MUST feel offended if certain sounds are uttered in a certain order
its total BS and bib brother thoughtcrime
And the message IS "you can't say that"
It is a religion plain and simple, an irrational belief and response to a set of "circumstances"
The aspect of "Political Correctness" that you describe is truly objectionable, and I would join you in fighting it. The issue at hand is that there are perfectly reasonable choices that are as quickly labeled "Political Correctness" and lumped in with the thought police. That needs to stop.
Sorry, but when I grew up, chicken was a Sunday treat. Once in a while, thank you very much.
Sure, today, chicken is every day's food. But not a mere 20-30 years ago.
And I'm "white". Or, rather, "dough-colored". "Pig-colored" if you like. "Skin Cancer Prone", even.
Water melon? Can only be consumed in two ways: Outside, or in the bath tub. Where's the "black" connection? "Whites" never ate water melon?
This is so stupid.
The aspect of "Political Correctness" that you describe is truly objectionable, and I would join you in fighting it. The issue at hand is that there are perfectly reasonable choices that are as quickly labeled "Political Correctness" and lumped in with the thought police. That needs to stop.