articulett
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2005
- Messages
- 15,404
Comparison: Bush and Hitler
- Thread starter Oliver
- Start date
Now we are getting to the heart of the matter. And speaking of same: I have maintained (purely due to the level and style of thinking evidenced in O's posts (make that multitudinous posts)) that O had a limited capacity for full understanding of the topic he has been trying to develop due to a lack of understanding of certain important factors of America/Americans. The response to this OP verifies that perfectly. That Oliver could not foresee that response is near perfect evidence that my belief was correct.
Once more, Oliver, there is a giant difference between Germany and the U.S. simply due to the differences in size and time as a developed nation. You continue to act as if this makes no difference. I strongly suggest you invest time in either intense study of sociology or intense study of history as it relates to geographically large states.
Undesired Walrus
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2007
- Messages
- 11,691
Nah.
The Painter
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2006
- Messages
- 2,654
How far-fetched are these comparisons? Incredibaly far fetched.
Which ones are realistic and indeed comparable? None of them
Undesired Walrus
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2007
- Messages
- 11,691
[table=head] Hitler | Bush
Had a problem with Bearded guys with hats | Has a problem with a bearded guy with a turban
Killed his dog | Plays with dog
Dead | Brain Dead [/table]
Had a problem with Bearded guys with hats | Has a problem with a bearded guy with a turban
Killed his dog | Plays with dog
Dead | Brain Dead [/table]
I follow up on this:
An excerpt is:
"GEORGE W. BUSH, PROPERLY understood, represents the third and most powerful wave in the Right's long-running assault on the government order created by twentieth-century liberalism.
The first wave was Ronald Reagan,...
...
They do not expect any of these far-reaching goals to be fulfilled during Bush's tenure, but they assume that history is on their side and that the next wave will come along soon...
..."
The right-wing agenda of government favoring concentration of the wealth, started by Goldwater, pursued by Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II is:
.) eliminate federal taxation of private capital, as the essential predicate for dismantling the progressive tax;
.) gradually phase out the pension-fund retirement system, starting with Social Security privatization;
.) withdraw the federal government for a direct role in housing, health care, assistance to the poor;
.) restore churches and private education by giving them public money;
(this point is similar to Hitler's position)
.) strenghten the hand of business against regulatory obligations;
(this point is similar to Hitler's position)
.) smash organized labor;
(this point is similar to Hitler's position)
.) instill fear to opposing the right-wing agenda;
(this point is similar to Hitler's and Goebbels' positions)
.) militarize U.S. by nationalizations and subsidies with public money, which makes only the U.S. military managed in a Socialist manner, everything else to be managed through fearmongering for Socialism.
(this point is similar to Hitler's position)
It's pushing for a return to McKinley Republicans, before Roosevelt's New Deal in the 1930s.
What this has in common with Mein Kampf by Hitler, is an equally driven idealogy that is loony and primitive, forcing most people's lives into miserable submission
Had I known this push for the Medieval ages that Bush II is pursuing right now, I wouldn't have made the effort to come to U.S..
I also condemn the jocksters in this thread who take Bush II lightly and for simpleton, as these jocksters being themselves brain dead about their own country.
The book Taking Back America by Katrina van den Heuvel has a chapter titled Rolling Back the Twentieth Century, written by William Greider -who also wrote The Soul of Capitalism-.
An excerpt is:
"GEORGE W. BUSH, PROPERLY understood, represents the third and most powerful wave in the Right's long-running assault on the government order created by twentieth-century liberalism.
The first wave was Ronald Reagan,...
...
They do not expect any of these far-reaching goals to be fulfilled during Bush's tenure, but they assume that history is on their side and that the next wave will come along soon...
..."
The right-wing agenda of government favoring concentration of the wealth, started by Goldwater, pursued by Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II is:
.) eliminate federal taxation of private capital, as the essential predicate for dismantling the progressive tax;
.) gradually phase out the pension-fund retirement system, starting with Social Security privatization;
.) withdraw the federal government for a direct role in housing, health care, assistance to the poor;
.) restore churches and private education by giving them public money;
(this point is similar to Hitler's position)
.) strenghten the hand of business against regulatory obligations;
(this point is similar to Hitler's position)
.) smash organized labor;
(this point is similar to Hitler's position)
.) instill fear to opposing the right-wing agenda;
(this point is similar to Hitler's and Goebbels' positions)
.) militarize U.S. by nationalizations and subsidies with public money, which makes only the U.S. military managed in a Socialist manner, everything else to be managed through fearmongering for Socialism.
(this point is similar to Hitler's position)
It's pushing for a return to McKinley Republicans, before Roosevelt's New Deal in the 1930s.
What this has in common with Mein Kampf by Hitler, is an equally driven idealogy that is loony and primitive, forcing most people's lives into miserable submission
Had I known this push for the Medieval ages that Bush II is pursuing right now, I wouldn't have made the effort to come to U.S..
I also condemn the jocksters in this thread who take Bush II lightly and for simpleton, as these jocksters being themselves brain dead about their own country.
Last edited:
Oliver
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 17,396
No -I'm serious. I hear this comparison pretty often - I didn't
make this up. And secondly - I doubt that People would even
notice if History would repeat itself ... there is no better proof
for that than the childish reactions I get in a Skeptics board.
Anyway: The new Book of Naomi Wolf "End of America" talks
about this issue and she's not kidding about it. So I don't
care if I get ridiculed for even opening the Topic - but the
Issue remains:
Which statements that I made on Jews?
Bring them on, and let's compare with Hitler's statements on Jews.
It's going to be egg on your face, Gurdur.
OK.
That's your claim.
Now prove it.
Bring my quotes
------------------
and
Compare with Hitler quotes on Jews.
-----------------------------------
Yeah, great piece of music.
Here's a direct link to the mp3:
http://www.mninter.net/~hedwards/bush/SBAS.mp3
(hope this is allowed? If not, delete)
Oliver
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 17,396
Here are two questions for you, "Gurdur":
A. Did the majority of Germans recognize the raise of Hitlers Power?
B. Would people be able to realize a similar raise of Power in their Democracy?
Oh, and do me the favor to take the pacifier out this time if you
have any comprehension regarding the topic. Thank you.
Last edited:
Tiddly om.
* yawns *A. Did the majority of Germans recognize the raise of Hitlers Power?
B. Would people be able to realize a similar raise of Power in their Democracy?
Oh, and do me the favor to take the pacifier out this time if you
have any comprehension regarding the topic. Thank you.
[table=head] Hitler | Bush
had Leni Riefenstahl | has Oliver
had Goebbels | has Oliver
not too successful | not too successful
met in beer cellers | doesn't anymore[/table]
So there is no basis for this:
only mindless parody.
Be careful to make supported statements.
Last edited: