• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Common Sense

StateofGrace

Does "jockland" refer to my home country or that weird term you guys use for sportsmen?

I am from Scotland and live down in the borders.

I work over seas and get so used to being called jock or other variations that I simply am so happy to have spent Hogmanay here; I refer to my country as jockland.

I'm proud to be a jock and to be from jockland.
:)
 
If you so much as call me a teuchter, then yer cruisin fur a wheen of grief!

North Uist, but work down south. Mainly Manchester, but also the Glasgow office.
 
So what makes the - 9/11 is an Inside Job Belief - such an unbelievable one? Tell me... logistically - why it was impossible for 28th Kingdom and Alex Jones to pull off 9/11.

We're not talking about the specifics of the execution of operation 9/11 i.e. star wars beams and holographic wings.

I am asking what makes it impossible for people who have extensively studied professionally trained military agents and their tactics to plant explosives in buildings...

What makes it impossible for explosives to bring down high-rise buildings...

What makes it impossible for corrupt entities to pull off false-flag attacks...

What makes it impossible for the members of PrisonPlanet.com to fly commercial size airliners... either by remote or with (hired) suicide pilots....

Please, shed yer ego and remove that red, white and blue war paint from yer face - and tell me specifically why it was impossible for 9/11 to be an inside job.


There ya go, same level of justification as 28th has.
 
So if we have a new 9/11 investigation and Rather & Jennings are called to the stand and asked if they think the guv planted bombs in the towers....what do you think they'll say?...

Probably, "Braaaaains", because they would have to be zombies. :boxedin:
 
28IQ and naturebonzo:

Please tell me that you're the kind of conspiraloon who are so alienated from the very idea of government that you neither vote nor show up for jury service- especially jury service.

The mere thought that the outcome of an election or the fate of a defendant could rest in the hands of people who are so clearly unfit for the task is enough to haunt my dreams with horror.
 
If you so much as call me a teuchter, then yer cruisin fur a wheen of grief!

North Uist, but work down south. Mainly Manchester, but also the Glasgow office.

Ack us lowland boys would na call ya a teuchter.

Dunna give me grief,I'm nay cruising for a bruising, I like teuchters, I have many teuchter friends.

Work up North, mainly out of Aberdeen, but go through Glasgow often and spend a lot of time over at Helensborough, great place.

Ps Gretna was unlucky at Hamden.
 
So what makes the - 9/11 is an Inside Job Belief - such an unbelievable one? Tell me... logistically - why it was impossible for Israel and the US to pull off 9/11.

It's unbelieveable because you have no proof this is what happened.



We're not talking about the specifics of the execution of operation 9/11 i.e. star wars beams and holographic wings.

I am asking what makes it impossible for professionally trained military agents to plant explosives in buildings...

Nothing makes it impossible. You have simply yet to prove this indeed took place on 9/11.

What makes it impossible for explosives to bring down high-rise buildings...

Nothing makes it impossible, as stated. You know that, and are being disingenuous and quite childish. Can't you do any better than all this?

What makes it impossible for corrupt entities to pull off false-flag attacks...

What makes it impossible for the US to fly commercial size airliners... either by remote or with (hired) suicide pilots....

Nothing makes these things impossible. You know this and are still being disingenous and childish. Doesn't your behavior ever get old to you? It gets old to us.

What makes it impossible for a man to jump from an airplane and fall 15,000 feet and survive?

Nothing. He did just that. Death, however, is far more likely.

Please, shed yer ego and remove that red, white and blue war paint from yer face - and tell me specifically why it was impossible for 9/11 to be an inside job.

It isn't impossible. It is astronomically unlikely. Yours is the burden of proof on this claim, so get to proving it. Stop asking questions and start answering them.

Step away from the computer and start protesting. You believe your government murdered thousands of your fellow citizens. Where is your outrage? Why aren't you doing something to protect us all? Are you really this selfish, this cowardly, this juvenile, that even though you say you know your government murdered thousands, you aren't saying anything?

What are you doing to hold your government accountable for the tragedy and the crimes it has inflicted on us? You say you know things, but you are willing to allow it to happen again? What kind of monster are you, that you can sit on such evidence as you have and do nothing?

Why are you farting around here, arguing with obvious morons, when lives have been taken and are still at stake? This is it? This is the very best you can do with what you know? You know some devastating things, man! Have a conscience! HELP US! Bring them to justice! Only you can do this!

I don't get you, man. I really don't. You'd rather sit here and argue with shills than actually make a difference.

And you call yourself an American. I am so ashamed, if this is the best example of honest, courageous young American manhood we can produce these days. Truly ashamed.
 
Last edited:
Dear Worthless Aging Hippie,

Is it possible to have a belief that differs from what the government says is true and not be a crazy person?

In your world... is there any such thing as a credible (non-crazy) whistleblower? And, if so... what are the credentials one must possess in order to qualify as a sane and reliable whistleblower?

Thank you.
 
Dear Worthless Aging Hippie,

Is it possible to have a belief that differs from what the government says is true and not be a crazy person?

That depends.

Are you a person who believes something without a shred of solid proof?

If so, then yes - you're a crazy person.
 
If you so much as call me a teuchter, then yer cruisin fur a wheen of grief!

North Uist, but work down south. Mainly Manchester, but also the Glasgow office.

Glasgow eh. Half my family live there. Apparently they mainly have criminal records and make the roughest estates rougher. Don't see them much, ever.

GIES THAT FOCKIN JAIKET!!!
 
Dear Worthless Aging Hippie,

Is it possible to have a belief that differs from what the government says is true and not be a crazy person?
.
Yes. However if that belief is in spite of all evidence to the contrary then said person may not be crazy just stupid.

In your world... is there any such thing as a credible (non-crazy) whistleblower? And, if so... what are the credentials one must possess in order to qualify as a sane and reliable whistleblower?

Thank you.
Absolutely there are credible whistleblowers. The qualification is simple: The whistleblower must have clear, verifiable evidence to back up what they say.

BTW: I'm still waiting for evidence of that thermite device that cuts vertical steel columns. Thought you might have found it on your sabbatical from the forum. Guess not.
 
natureboy, please use the quote function, when quoting another person's post. Thanks.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
[/quote]

Not using the quote fucntion... doesn't this sound like how a recently banned "member" operated???:mad:
 
Why does everyone always address my questions with questions, and then accuse me of avoiding their questions...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

Because every time we do answer your questions, you either ignore the answers, or dismiss them with a sniff and a handwave. So why should we keep trying? Taking the piss out of you is more entertaining, and exactly as productive.

Now, ignore this answer, or dismiss it.

Good boy!

"scunnered" is right......
 
Dear Worthless Aging Hippie,

Is it possible to have a belief that differs from what the government says is true and not be a crazy person?

In your world... is there any such thing as a credible (non-crazy) whistleblower? And, if so... what are the credentials one must possess in order to qualify as a sane and reliable whistleblower?

Thank you.

Dear Useless Immature Nutbag,

Yes, it is possible to have a belief that differs from what the government says is true and not be a crazy person. It's just that your particular belief is not one of them.

The credentials one must possess in order to qualify as a sane and reliable whistleblower are 1) Verifiable evidence, which you're actually willing to provide; 2) Some sort of coherent narative to explain how said evidence proves whatever it is; 3) A willingness to actually put themselves on the line; anonymous internet tough guys need not apply.

You're welcome.
 
Dear Worthless Aging Hippie,

Is it possible to have a belief that differs from what the government says is true and not be a crazy person?

In your world... is there any such thing as a credible (non-crazy) whistleblower? And, if so... what are the credentials one must possess in order to qualify as a sane and reliable whistleblower?

Thank you.

Wel, blow, boy, blow! Get to blowing! What's stopping you? What are you doing to help us, to save your country, your neighbors, your own family?

Come on, sonny boy, get crackin!


(Oh, and yesterday I was a computer programmer. What are you going to do--keep trying to push buttons until you land on an insult I'll bite into? So you can then say, "AH-HA! I knew you were __________!" Who were you accusing of using ad homs a while ago?)
 
The reason none of you left-brain radicals have any common sense, is because you lack imagination, which is at the heart of functioning common sense. (sadly, for you guys/gals - this creative component of imaginary lives in the right-side of the brain)

Common sense has nothing to do with imagination!

common sense

n.

Sound judgment not based on specialized knowledge; native good judgment.

(from: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/common+sense)

What you defined is creativity - the ability to create something from nothing, to make things up, to invent, to fabricate, to fantasize.

You missed that there were three components to the definition you posted (items 2a, b and 3) 2b takes the imagination definition of conceive, which is to create and conflated it with 3, which means to understand. 2a is to be able to accept, such as accepting the NIST report :D

Real common sense would include the ability to recognize the difference between pure fantasy and reality.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom