Tirdun
Muse
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2006
- Messages
- 637
Here, 28K, let me help.
Let's take a different event and reveal how it was an inside job. I'm sick of the 9/11 nonsense, so let's take something in which there are now no living survivors.
For this example, I claim the sinking of the RMS Titanic was a conspiracy.
The current Troother system is to make endless lists of either unsupported claims or so-called questions that attack a million tiny bits of the official story. A) isn't big enough. Why is B) ten degrees off center. I heard that C) said such and such. There's no coherence and often contradiction in their questions. Not enough body parts versus no plane at all versus drone/missile in your current gruesome example.
Instead, form a logical argument that takes all evidence into account.
I claim that the discovered wreck of the Titanic shows unmistakable signs of a torpedo hit. I present pictures of that hole and compare it to other torpedo holes in that era. I find experts in iceberg and torpedo damage. I do not entertain the possibility that it was a magic torpedo or a German beam weapon designed to create a hole that looks like a torpedo. I do not make claims that it cannot be an iceberg if the vast consensus of experts say it was an iceberg. I do not claim later that by "torpedo" I meant "mine" or "bomb" or "guy in steerage with a pickaxe". I do not attack the iceberg believers or experts and claim they've been paid off by the bottled water industry. I do not create long lists of vaguely iceberg related questions. I do not bring the motives of the Captain into question when he's dead and has nothing to say on the matter. I do not mention the movie Titanic, the stage play or the book written by Cussler.
Even if this, just this is all you can prove (not who shot the torpedo or why) then you've successfully shown a flaw in the official theory. The problem with every Truther I've been exposed to is that they stop at the first sentence of the above paragraph.
Let's take a different event and reveal how it was an inside job. I'm sick of the 9/11 nonsense, so let's take something in which there are now no living survivors.
For this example, I claim the sinking of the RMS Titanic was a conspiracy.
The current Troother system is to make endless lists of either unsupported claims or so-called questions that attack a million tiny bits of the official story. A) isn't big enough. Why is B) ten degrees off center. I heard that C) said such and such. There's no coherence and often contradiction in their questions. Not enough body parts versus no plane at all versus drone/missile in your current gruesome example.
Instead, form a logical argument that takes all evidence into account.
I claim that the discovered wreck of the Titanic shows unmistakable signs of a torpedo hit. I present pictures of that hole and compare it to other torpedo holes in that era. I find experts in iceberg and torpedo damage. I do not entertain the possibility that it was a magic torpedo or a German beam weapon designed to create a hole that looks like a torpedo. I do not make claims that it cannot be an iceberg if the vast consensus of experts say it was an iceberg. I do not claim later that by "torpedo" I meant "mine" or "bomb" or "guy in steerage with a pickaxe". I do not attack the iceberg believers or experts and claim they've been paid off by the bottled water industry. I do not create long lists of vaguely iceberg related questions. I do not bring the motives of the Captain into question when he's dead and has nothing to say on the matter. I do not mention the movie Titanic, the stage play or the book written by Cussler.
Even if this, just this is all you can prove (not who shot the torpedo or why) then you've successfully shown a flaw in the official theory. The problem with every Truther I've been exposed to is that they stop at the first sentence of the above paragraph.
