• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Common FDR Arguments Addressed

I'm with the FAA, remember?

I just completed (and passed) my flight surgeon physical last month. They're very thorough.

NOBODY allows their cert to "expire" unless it's over.

Got the "chemtrail fever", huh Rob?

No I don't remember that...your celebrity doesn't reach that far.

Why did you say the FAA doesnt allow him to fly when its not true, why did you lie?

If Rob gets his medical next week.. will you never post on the net again?

Since you are "FAA" surely he can make sure its geniune

In fact, prove YOU work for the FAA.

Because last I remember, you are the same FAA employee who said he would steal from a conference and sneak in. And aren't you the same FAA employee who e-mailed me on myspace, trying to intimidate me with details about what kind of car I drive and where I live? Aren't you the same FAA employee who got suspended from Jref for harassing me? (in turn you got me suspended for being the victim, but apparently Jref's rules and judgements are one-sided.)

What is YOUR name and what proof you have that YOU work for FAA? Give us your name so we can verify that you passed your physical.
 
Wasn't JDX banned here for using more than one account? Weedwacker was one. I can't recall the other.
He was posting on someone ese's account. I don't know if that disqualifies him from registering in his own name or not. But he was completelu unable to defend any of his nonsense here before.

If he's banned here, maybe he could register at SLC and try his luck there. But it's unlikely he will post anywhere where he can't ban anyone who makes him look stupid, which is bound to happen. It really sucks to be an ex-pilot forced to peddle snake-oil troof to idiots to make a living, but that is exactly the hand Rob Balsamo is playing now.
 
I opened this thread assuming that I would find "Common FDR Arguments Addressed".

I have so far seen neither any "common FDR arguments" or and addressing of said arguments.

Lyte, perhaps you would like to put forward one argument and response at a time for us?

It's in the OP.

Click the little links.
 
I do kind of feel bad for the guy, he's been rejected both by the mainstream and the conspiracy movement... and he has to compensate with this bizarre, "only I can see the evidence!!!!" belief that has to border on some kind of delusion. Can any rational person think that many thousands of people, each many hundreds of times more qualified, failed to see what he sees?

Because... why? He's smarter than everyone else? He's braver? What? What fantasy can he have set up in his mind to justify the fact that no one else who's studied the situation has come up with the same conclusion?
 
Wasn't JDX banned here for using more than one account? Weedwacker was one. I can't recall the other.

Yes, he's been banned.

As if he and Lyte didn't know.

Funny how they would rather play the "I can't seem to register game" instead of owning up to it. I guess ignorance comes as a natural defense.
 
No I don't remember that...


...Because last I remember, you are the same FAA employee
Looks like the diggety-dank is really messing up that short-term memory, eh Lyte? I mean, that was in the same post for crying out loud.
 
Is ANYONE going to address the facts? Your replies speaks volumes.


The "facts" that you are attempting to raise here have been addressed. Ad nauseum.

There is nothing that can be said in this thread (or any other most likely) that will satisfy you in any way. There comes a point where the entire exercise becomes pointless.

Lyte, you are convinced, no matter how much evidence to the contrary is shown to you, that you are right. Continually trying to hash it out here is utterly inane.

The members of this forum are not fools. They are not stupid. If you had even a single valid point, just one, things would be different. How long have you been here at JREF arguing the same points over and over and over?

Nobody here is falling for it Lyte. You can rant, moan and call us names all you want. You can sit back and feel all smug and superior because you think you have all the answers.

Your claims hold no weight here. You have no evidence that even comes close to convincing us of you theories. We're not going to change your mind and you will not change ours.

So, where does that leave us Lyte? It's what's known as an impasse. We can't make any progress here. It's up to you now Lyte. Are you going to continue banging you head against this wall? Because really, we aren't the ones that need to be convinced by your claims. It's the authorities and the courts.
 
He was posting on someone ese's account. I don't know if that disqualifies him from registering in his own name or not. But he was completelu unable to defend any of his nonsense here before.

If he's banned here, maybe he could register at SLC and try his luck there. But it's unlikely he will post anywhere where he can't ban anyone who makes him look stupid, which is bound to happen. It really sucks to be an ex-pilot forced to peddle snake-oil troof to idiots to make a living, but that is exactly the hand Rob Balsamo is playing now.

Oh please, he came on here to address facts long ago using someone else's account. People were trying to let multiple users use it. He just popped on to address the info without being distracted because he is the infamous and hated Banhammer, JDX.

Prove it is snake oil. Address the facts. Note no one has.

You have got to feel dumb right now. You should.

Can't you people just stop being so arrogant for once and think for yourselves? Can't you ever concede anything?

Have you ever seen a Jrefer concede ANYTHING to a "twoofer"?

Of course not, because you people have pride issues. And some definitely have emotional issues.

Just stop being a mindless repetitive chimp and analyze what he put forth for you.

Lyte Trip, I have had to repeatedly moderate your posts in the last few days for reasons of civility violations under the tighter rules in this sub-forum. You have apparently ignored those warnings and mod boxes reminding you to attack the argument, and not the person.

Given this, I am once more informing you that uncivil remarks are not acceptable and are a violation of your membership agreement. Further action may be pending regarding your repeated violation of this rule.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: jmercer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The "facts" that you are attempting to raise here have been addressed. Ad nauseum.

There is nothing that can be said in this thread (or any other most likely) that will satisfy you in any way. There comes a point where the entire exercise becomes pointless.

Lyte, you are convinced, no matter how much evidence to the contrary is shown to you, that you are right. Continually trying to hash it out here is utterly inane.

The members of this forum are not fools. They are not stupid. If you had even a single valid point, just one, things would be different. How long have you been here at JREF arguing the same points over and over and over?

Nobody here is falling for it Lyte. You can rant, moan and call us names all you want. You can sit back and feel all smug and superior because you think you have all the answers.

Your claims hold no weight here. You have no evidence that even comes close to convincing us of you theories. We're not going to change your mind and you will not change ours.

So, where does that leave us Lyte? It's what's known as an impasse. We can't make any progress here. It's up to you now Lyte. Are you going to continue banging you head against this wall? Because really, we aren't the ones that need to be convinced by your claims. It's the authorities and the courts.


Do you even know what you are looking at? Or is it because some anonymous aviation "professional" on Jref confused you enough that it's "good enough for you"?

Read your post, then read the others.

You are just telling me it is debunked. Explain it. Clearly you are all the critical thinkers and rational experts.

Put up or shut up.
 
Looks like the diggety-dank is really messing up that short-term memory, eh Lyte? I mean, that was in the same post for crying out loud.

Wow, looks like Wild cat is hurting bad. You got nothing toots?

You guys are the joke.

This thread is NEVER going to die. I might even screenshot this to show the level of maturity and critical thinking going on the James Randi Forum.

Thanks:D
 
Why did you say the FAA doesnt allow him to fly when its not true, why did you lie?

What is YOUR name and what proof you have that YOU work for FAA? Give us your name so we can verify that you passed your physical.
Didn't you just ADMIT (on Robs behalf) that his medical certificate expired last month?

Doesn't that, in and of itself, preclude him from flying?

Wouldn't that qualify as "the FAA doesn't allow him to fly?"

And you call me a liar.

Oh, and I don't think I'll give you my real name today stalker boy...
 
I do kind of feel bad for the guy, he's been rejected both by the mainstream and the conspiracy movement... and he has to compensate with this bizarre, "only I can see the evidence!!!!" belief that has to border on some kind of delusion. Can any rational person think that many thousands of people, each many hundreds of times more qualified, failed to see what he sees?

Because... why? He's smarter than everyone else? He's braver? What? What fantasy can he have set up in his mind to justify the fact that no one else who's studied the situation has come up with the same conclusion?


Hey it's David Wrong.

Hi David. You got nothing huh?

I know, it sucks.

Listen to yourself.

Go read the OP and then read your reply to yourself...read it slowly so you can understand...and tell me what's wong with the picture.

Lyte Trip, I have had to repeatedly moderate your posts in the last few days for reasons of civility violations under the tighter rules in this sub-forum. You have apparently ignored those warnings and mod boxes reminding you to attack the argument, and not the person.

Given this, I am once more informing you that uncivil remarks are not acceptable and are a violation of your membership agreement. Further action may be pending regarding your repeated violation of this rule.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: jmercer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This thread is NEVER going to die. I might even screenshot this to show the level of maturity and critical thinking going on the James Randi Forum.

Thanks:D

Is that the whole point? Have you grown jealous of the work of Malcom Kirkman and seek to emulate his mad posting binge? If so, I think you'll need to stock up on the crazy, because as nutty as I think your theories are Malcom is in a whole nuther category.
 
Didn't you just ADMIT (on Robs behalf) that his medical certificate expired last month?

Doesn't that, in and of itself, preclude him from flying?

Wouldn't that qualify as "the FAA doesn't allow him to fly?"

And you call me a liar.

Oh, and I don't think I'll give you my real name today stalker boy...

You said "the FAA doesn't allow him to fly". You clearly said it without explanation while implying the FAA is barring him from flying because he believes in chemtrails". You implied it like he is never allowed to fly again because he is not a sound pilot. You are a a real piece of work.

The FAA allows him to fly. They did not pull his certificate. Im glad you recognize the fact he can schedule a medical tomorrow and be in the air by Sat.. or do you not think that is possible?

You're calling ME the stalker? Ok, weirdo. You know what you are and what you did.

Lyte Trip, I have had to repeatedly moderate your posts in the last few days for reasons of civility violations under the tighter rules in this sub-forum. You have apparently ignored those warnings and mod boxes reminding you to attack the argument, and not the person.

Given this, I am once more informing you that uncivil remarks are not acceptable and are a violation of your membership agreement. Further action may be pending regarding your repeated violation of this rule.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: jmercer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you even know what you are looking at? Or is it because some anonymous aviation "professional" on Jref confused you enough that it's "good enough for you"?

saywhat.jpg
 
Is that the whole point? Have you grown jealous of the work of Malcom Kirkman and seek to emulate his mad posting binge? If so, I think you'll need to stock up on the crazy, because as nutty as I think your theories are Malcom is in a whole nuther category.

Tell you what if you are not going to address the OP, save yourself the embarrassment of adding your name to the list of Jrefers who failed miserably to address the specific facts listed in the OP.
 
Tell you what if you are not going to address the OP, save yourself the embarrassment of adding your name to the list of Jrefers who failed miserably to address the specific facts listed in the OP.

A simple "yes" or "no" would do. I can understand if you strive for such a goal but don't want to mention it to the rest of the posters for fear of a mass boycott of a thread that obviously treads ground covered many, many times before.

We'll just keep it between the two of us.
 

Back
Top Bottom