• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Common FDR Arguments Addressed

Strike 3!

Yeeeeeeerrr ooooouutt!


Next batter up.


Well, maybe the Chemtrails got in the batters eyes.

Hey lyte. How do you claim to be a serious researcher and justify your belief in nonsense like that at the same time? Does Rob even care that it makes you out to be another nutter or is he on board too?
 
I live 15 miles from where the Ducks play, but I have never been to a game. At least they still have Anaheim in their name unlike those [Rule 8]ing Angels. Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim my [Rule 8]ing arse!! So for that reason alone, I am rooting for the Ducks.

Lisa, is thread hijacking a common practice on this forum? I understand most of the users on this forum are inept when it comes to countering facts, but is this really needed?

Are you saying you not only do it, but condone it?
 
Strike 1!

(Big swing and a miss)
Sorry Lyte, your hero johnd'oh failed miserably when he posted here, and is too cowardly to come back. His FDR analysis has been theoroughly debunked, and because he has failed to even show up here at the old ballpark he's just going to have to forfeit the game.
 
Well, maybe the Chemtrails got in the batters eyes.

Hey lyte. How do you claim to be a serious researcher and justify your belief in nonsense like that at the same time? Does Rob even care that it makes you out to be another nutter or is he on board too?


Steeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiike 3!

Yeerrrrrr ouOOT!
 
I live 15 miles from where the Ducks play, but I have never been to a game. At least they still have Anaheim in their name unlike those [Rule 8]ing Angels. Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim my [Rule 8]ing arse!! So for that reason alone, I am rooting for the Ducks.

And yet you don't know how many periods are in a game, but you are about to claim the most sacred object in Canadian culture:

Wikipedia said:
The Stanley Cup is the oldest trophy competed for by professional athletes in North America.[2] Originally inscribed the Dominion Hockey Challenge Cup, the trophy was donated by Lord Stanley of Preston, then Governor General of Canada, in 1892 as an award for Canada's top-ranking amateur ice hockey club, decided by the acceptances of a challenge from another league championship team. Then in 1915, a gentlemen's agreement between two professional ice hockey organizations, the National Hockey Association (NHA) and the Pacific Coast Hockey Association (PCHA), was reached in which their respective champions would face each other for the Stanley Cup. After a series of league mergers and folds, it became the de facto championship trophy of the NHL in 1926. The Cup would later become the official de jure NHL championship prize in 1947.

My poor little Canuck heart cries out in pain.


(But I'm getting a perverse satisfaction from contributing to a derail of Lyte's thread).
 
Sorry Lyte, your hero johnd'oh failed miserably when he posted here, and is too cowardly to come back. His FDR analysis has been theoroughly debunked, and because he has failed to even show up here at the old ballpark he's just going to have to forfeit the game.

(Ok folks, we've got one of the heavy hitters here...he's a real wildcat.)

PFT winds up for the pitch, SWING AND A MISS from Wildcat.

This isn't looking good for the Jrefer's folks.I hope we don't have to go into extra innings, before they even get a hit.
 
Steeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiike 3!

Yeerrrrrr ouOOT!


I'll take that as, "Yepper! Robbie and I are on the same page with chemtrails. In fact, that's why he is no longer allowed to fly by the FAA."

Not surprising.
 
(Ok folks, we've got one of the heavy hitters here...he's a real wildcat.)

PFT winds up for the pitch, SWING AND A MISS from Wildcat.

This isn't looking good for the Jrefer's folks.I hope we don't have to go into extra innings, before they even get a hit.

C'mon...how about some hockey metaphors. Get in the spirit of the game!
 
Is ANYONE going to address the facts? Your replies speaks volumes.

No wait, let me do it.

"Oh my god Lyte Bryte, john Doh has been like totally debunked like a gazillion times, how many times do we have to say it to you?

...We haven't actually debunked it, but we have said it to you...many times."
 
Hey Lyte, according to you it's impossible for ANYTHING to get hijacked, so why are you worried about a little thread?

And where are my ad homs?
 
I'll take that as, "Yepper! Robbie and I are on the same page with chemtrails. In fact, that's why he is no longer allowed to fly by the FAA."

Not surprising.

I'll take that as "I got nuthin' so I'm just gonna lie."

His FAA certificate is well intact. Use the FAA database, Brainiac.
 
Hey Lyte, according to you it's impossible for ANYTHING to get hijacked, so why are you worried about a little thread?

Never said that. But if your lie helps convince people go right ahead.

The ad homs will come. Pretty soon, someone will come and kick dirt on my cleats.

Where's your concession? It appears your 'argument' is unsecured.
 
I'll take that as "I got nuthin' so I'm just gonna lie."

His FAA certificate is well intact. Use the FAA database, Brainiac.

His medical certificate is NOT active. He is NOT allowed to fly.

Got more?
 
Tripe Lip have you contacted the authorities yet? when will the prosecutor convene a grand jury hearing on your pentacon "evidence'? has any one person bought into your researcher's edition? Or are you just here today being balsamos Fifi bag?
 
Didn't the Jrefers promote that Rob Balsamo was dead?

Do you guys always promote dubious claims out of desperation?
 
Tripe Lip have you contacted the authorities yet? when will the prosecutor convene a grand jury hearing on your pentacon "evidence'? has any one person bought into your researcher's edition? Or are you just here today being balsamos Fifi bag?


Translation: "aaarrgh....I don't know how to counter these facts, so I will insult him...because I am so emotionally unbalanced."

Why can't you just counter the facts, fluffy? And by fluffy, I was referring to your hair.

Lyte Trip, I have had to repeatedly moderate your posts in the last few days for reasons of civility violations under the tighter rules in this sub-forum. You have apparently ignored those warnings and mod boxes reminding you to attack the argument, and not the person.

Given this, I am once more informing you that uncivil remarks are not acceptable and are a violation of your membership agreement. Further action may be pending regarding your repeated violation of this rule.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: jmercer
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Back
Top Bottom