Attaboy
Anyone who spends 5 minutes looking at the history of these inventions can be pretty sure of it. See:
http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/bledison.htm
Readers of his patent applications can replicate the devices. And telephones are not equipped with self-destruct devices to protect the "sensible" info concealed in their guts. In spite of omitting this precaution Edison made money. Lots of it!
Why didn't "big money" stop him, to protect its investment in existing technology like the telegraph? And for that matter why was the telegraph not earlier suppressed by "big money" to protect its investments in the Pony Express, and tying messages to pigeons' legs? Because the telegraph WORKS.
Electric lighting works too.
Attention on the right kind of things that work - that's the key, seemingly.
The gas interests were quite unable to suppress the new light. They competed with it by introducing improved gas mantles, cooking hobs, water heaters etc., to retain their customers.
The seven systems were:
Quite so!
So J.P.M. - and if there was ever "big money" he was it! - didn't stifle the electric light at birth - he embraced it (because it works), and he and its inventor made millions.
And as to with the cinematograph .... But enough. We see the picture. Why is the history of cold fusion so different? Because it doesn't work; it can't be reproduced, it's not reliable.
Not because it's being suppressed by malevolent all powerful big money manipulators.
You make it all sound so simple. Can anyone be sure there wasn't a period where, their inventions were looked upon much as Rossi's is now, and they opted to avoid the big money crowd?
Anyone who spends 5 minutes looking at the history of these inventions can be pretty sure of it. See:
http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/bledison.htm
August 12, 1877, is the date popularly given for Edison's completion of the model for the first phonograph. It is more likely, however, that work on the model was not finished until November or December of that year, since he did not file for the patent until December 24, 1877.
Readers of his patent applications can replicate the devices. And telephones are not equipped with self-destruct devices to protect the "sensible" info concealed in their guts. In spite of omitting this precaution Edison made money. Lots of it!
Why didn't "big money" stop him, to protect its investment in existing technology like the telegraph? And for that matter why was the telegraph not earlier suppressed by "big money" to protect its investments in the Pony Express, and tying messages to pigeons' legs? Because the telegraph WORKS.
Electric lighting works too.
There are a couple of other interesting things about the invention of the light bulb: While most of the attention was on the discovery of the right kind of filament that would work,
Attention on the right kind of things that work - that's the key, seemingly.
Edison actually had to invent a total of seven system elements that were critical to the practical application of electric lights as an alternative to the gas lights that were prevalent in that day.
The gas interests were quite unable to suppress the new light. They competed with it by introducing improved gas mantles, cooking hobs, water heaters etc., to retain their customers.
The seven systems were:
the parallel circuit, a durable light bulb, an improved dynamo, the underground conductor network, the devices for maintaining constant voltage, safety fuses and insulating materials, and light sockets with on-off switches.
Before Edison could make his millions, every one of these elements had to be invented and then, through careful trial and error, developed into practical, reproducible components.
Quite so!
The success of his electric light brought Thomas Edison to new heights of fame and wealth, as electricity spread around the world. ( ... )The tremendous amount of capital needed to develop the incandescent lighting industry had necessitated the involvement of investment bankers such as J.P. Morgan.
So J.P.M. - and if there was ever "big money" he was it! - didn't stifle the electric light at birth - he embraced it (because it works), and he and its inventor made millions.
And as to with the cinematograph .... But enough. We see the picture. Why is the history of cold fusion so different? Because it doesn't work; it can't be reproduced, it's not reliable.
Not because it's being suppressed by malevolent all powerful big money manipulators.
