Ed clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham?

Status
Not open for further replies.
sunmaster14 said:
If you want a President whose feet are held to the fire, you need to elect a Republican because the Republicans either can't or won't successfully defend a President purely for partisan purposes.
Click to expand...

:jaw-dropp

Oh my dear FSM. You have got to be kidding.

This is a joke, right?

Right?
 
sunmaster14 said:
If you want a President whose feet are held to the fire, you need to elect a Republican because the Republicans either can't or won't successfully defend a President purely for partisan purposes.
Click to expand...

:dl:

Sorry, sunmaster, we're not so young here that we don't remember the 2000-2008 era.
 
Cleon said:
:dl:

Sorry, sunmaster, we're not so young here that we don't remember the 2000-2008 era.
Click to expand...

To be fair, he didn't say that Republicans wouldn't defend a Republican president for purely partisan purposes, just that they were incapable of doing it successfully. :p
 
A'isha said:
To be fair, he didn't say that Republicans wouldn't defend a Republican president for purely partisan purposes, just that they were incapable of doing it successfully. :p
Click to expand...

Well, true, they weren't able to get him a third term... :p
 
I think this is the best thing that could happen for liberals. We don't want another conservative in the WH. Clinton getting out now will allow time for a good liberal candidate to make their case for the job.
 
16.5 said:
A plurality of Americans do not believe that Hillary Clinton is honest and a majority think it was not appropriate for her to use a private email account while she was Secretary of State, according to a new CBS News poll.

As more details about Clinton’s private email scandal come to light, Clinton’s favorability ratings are plummeting.
Click to expand...

Well, that's one way to look at it.

However, correlation != causation. Since they had to go back to fall 2013 to reference her last favor ability ratings, it seems that plummeting is not the right word to use.

It still doesn't appear as if it has drastically affected her chances to win a presidential election.
 
Hillary produced no documents in response to the subpoena and her lawyer admitted she intentionally wiped the cowboy server's memory in order to destroy all emails.

Is that what an innocent person would do? Of course not.

Next, Congress votes to subpoena the sever itself.
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
A plurality of Americans do not believe that Hillary Clinton is honest and a majority think it was not appropriate for her to use a private email account while she was Secretary of State, according to a new CBS News poll.

As more details about Clinton’s private email scandal come to light, Clinton’s favorability ratings are plummeting.
Click to expand...

And now all email are deleted and the server won't be given.

I am not an American and i can't exactely say i like democrats which might bias me (maybe I can say that I find them less abhor-able than republican ?) but oh boy those email deletion reek of wanting to hide something pretty damning.
 
This article argues that Clinton is probably guilty of the serious crime of obstruction of justice.

By her own admission, Clinton destroyed more than 30,000 emails once the subpoenas started coming in. She claims she only destroyed personal records. Team Clinton initially explained her work emails were separated from her personal emails using keyword searches. Now, Clinton is insisting every email was individually read before the deletion.

Still, this leaves questions unanswered. How did those reviewing the emails define “personal”? If Clinton had emailed a foreign government about a donation to the Clinton Foundation, was that message — whatever its interest to watchdogs or voters — tossed in the trash bin?

According to the law, no one has to use email, but it is a crime (18 U.S.C. Section 1519) to destroy even one message to prevent it from being subpoenaed. As T. Markus Funk explained in a journal article for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, prosecutors charging someone with obstruction “need only prove that the defendant shredded the documents, at least in part, to make life more difficult for future investigators, if and when they eventually appear.”

Legal commentators call this “anticipatory obstruction of justice,” and the law punishes it with as much as 20 years imprisonment. The burden of proof is light. The Justice Department manual advises Section 1519 makes prosecution much easier because it covers “any matters” or “ ‘in relation to or contemplation of’ any matters.” It adds, “No corrupt persuasion is required.”
Click to expand...
 
On the day of her press conference, her handlers released a written statement regarding the "detailed" term search her team went through before they destroyed the remainder.

After the predictable outrage, they completely changed their story and claimed that they in fact reviewed all of the documents.

If so, why in the hell did they claim they did a term search?
 
NoahFence said:
...just rechecking to see if anyone gives a :rule10: yet.
Click to expand...

Is there a reason that you repeatedly come into the thread to tell everyone how much you don't care?

Hillary intentionally destroyed 30000 emails! Noahfence does not care.

NOTED!
 
In regards to her work emails, did she destroy the digital copies of those after only turning over the printed paper ones?
That would seem irresponsible at the least.

The more she talks through her team and lawyers, the worse it looks. I'm guessing she doesnt want to incriminate herself in case there is something out in the digital ether that contradicts any personal statements.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom