Ed Clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham Part 3

[varwoche]

why would it trouble anyone? It was always Hillary's fault.

Although the Democrat Party could have avoided the problem by nominating someone not weighed down by her horrific baggage.

But they cleared the field and stuck us with Trump.

While it's true that her actions were the root cause, that's not a magic talisman that absolves all subsequent actions by other parties.

 

[The Big Dog]

While it's true that her actions were the root cause, that's not a magic talisman that absolves all subsequent actions by other parties.

There is nothing to absolve, there were Hillary's classified emails on an internationally renowned pervert's computer.

Hillary should have resolved the problem a year earlier.

 

[BobTheCoward]

There is nothing to absolve, there were Hillary's classified emails on an internationally renowned pervert's computer.

Hillary should have resolved the problem a year earlier.

How does her mishandling compare to the state department average. Was her mishandling unreasonable? By how much?

 

[The Big Dog]

How does her mishandling compare to the state department average. Was her mishandling unreasonable? By how much?

It was much worse.
It was completely unreasonable.
Exponentially worse.

 

[BobTheCoward]

It was much worse.
It was completely unreasonable.
Exponentially worse.

Two questions...
How?
Proof?

 

[The Big Dog]

Two questions...
How?
Proof?

How what?
This thread and its previous thread, plus, Trump.

 

[Meadmaker]

Exponentially worse.

[Pet Peeve]"exponential" does not mean "very large", or anything similar.[/Pet Peeve]

 

[BobTheCoward]

How what?
This thread and its previous thread, plus, Trump.

Actually, the one thing I haven't ever seen in any of these discussions is how much classified material is mishandled on average. Did Clinton actually mishandle more or less classified material than average for people with as much access?

 

[Giz]

You can't be serious.

I agree. It's crazy that hillary's campaign came off as the more self obsessed one.

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

I agree. It's crazy that hillary's campaign came off as the more self obsessed one.

To who? To you? To the people who believed magical uncle Trump could make deals?

It certainly didn't come across that way to the 66 million people who voted for Clinton.

 

[Ziggurat]

How does her mishandling compare to the state department average. Was her mishandling unreasonable? By how much?

Her mishandling was definitely unreasonable. If it was average for the state department, then the state department needs to be razed to the ground.

 

[BobTheCoward]

Her mishandling was definitely unreasonable. If it was average for the state department, then the state department needs to be razed to the ground.

That doesn't give any consideration for what is reasonably achievable. Before trying to fix something, you need to measure it first.

 

[The Big Dog]

That doesn't give any consideration for what is reasonably achievable. Before trying to fix something, you need to measure it first.

Unfortunately, Hillary and her staff refused to cooperate with the State Deprtment inspector general in his investigation of her use of email.

 

[Ziggurat]

That doesn't give any consideration for what is reasonably achievable.

Better than what Hillary did is easily achievable. And if it's not, well, all the more reason to burn State to the ground.

 

[BobTheCoward]

Better than what Hillary did is easily achievable. And if it's not, well, all the more reason to burn State to the ground.

what do you base this on?

 

[BobTheCoward]

Unfortunately, Hillary and her staff refused to cooperate with the State Deprtment inspector general in his investigation of her use of email.

Good. Hopefully people realize that they should take the advice of lawyers.

 

[The Big Dog]

Good. Hopefully people realize that they should take the advice of lawyers.

No, it is not good, not in any way. It is not good for the American people, and it was not good for her, because she was exposed as a liar and a fraud who put her own interests ahead of the country she wanted to lead.

She also never said that lawyers told her not to cooperate, nor was there any basis for a lawyer to do so.

 

[BobTheCoward]

No, it is not good, not in any way. It is not good for the American people, and it was not good for her, because she was exposed as a liar and a fraud who put her own interests ahead of the country she wanted to lead.

She also never said that lawyers told her not to cooperate, nor was there any basis for a lawyer to do so.

Well, if she didn't need a layer.to tell her to remain silent then even better.

 

[The Big Dog]

Well, if she didn't need a layer.to tell her to remain silent then even better.

She did not remain silent, she said she was going to cooperate with her own department's inspector general and she did not.

Odd that you think she did a good thing. She acted like a fool.

 

[BobTheCoward]

She did not remain silent, she said she was going to cooperate with her own department's inspector general and she did not.

Odd that you think she did a good thing. She acted like a fool.

I absolutely support anyone that refuses to participate in an investigation.