• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ed Clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Weiner would not be a pedophile if the women are as young as 15. They would be post pubescent.

I stand corrected, I don't want semantics to get in the way of a good classified email scandal. Anthony Weiner's perversion is ephebophilia instead of pedophilia. He prefers his illegal, underage, middle-school girls to have entered puberty before he starts sexting them.
 
I stand corrected, I don't want semantics to get in the way of a good classified email scandal. Anthony Weiner's perversion is ephebophilia instead of pedophilia. He prefers his illegal, underage, middle-school girls to have entered puberty before he starts sexting them.

Thank you. This is a very important issue to me.
 
One wonders if Hillary and her gang had not refused to cooperate with the Inspector General of the State Department (hell if Hillary had an Inspector General while she was SoS) they would not be in this mess.

But of course they didn't and she didn't and now the FBI had to restart the investigation because Hillary's body woman left 1000's of clintonemails on a device that her husband used to store his vast array of penis selfies.

Self inflicted damage from top to bottom, and now the Capo is screeching that the FBI should release all the emails, just like she did before despite the loads of classified intelligence on them.
 
One wonders if Hillary and her gang had not refused to cooperate with the Inspector General of the State Department (hell if Hillary had an Inspector General while she was SoS) they would not be in this mess.

But of course they didn't and she didn't and now the FBI had to restart the investigation because Hillary's body woman left 1000's of clintonemails on a device that her husband used to store his vast array of penis selfies.

Self inflicted damage from top to bottom, and now the Capo is screeching that the FBI should release all the emails, just like she did before despite the loads of classified intelligence on them.

This is much ado about nothing, or in republitard land - "yuuuggee"

:dl:
 
This is much ado about nothing, or in republitard land - "yuuuggee"

the last time you posted a laughing dog you also thought there were "three" emails involved and thought it significant that the scumbags in the Clinton Campaign were "asking for transparency" despite their ferocious coverup and refusal to cooperate

Type "republitard" again.
 
Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates objected to FBI Director James Comey's decision to notify Congress about his bureau's review of emails related to Hillary Clinton's personal server.

Gosh, Loretta, did Bill ask you to do that while discussing "grandchildren" on a tarmac?
 
the last time you posted a laughing dog you also thought there were "three" emails involved and thought it significant that the scumbags in the Clinton Campaign were "asking for transparency" despite their ferocious coverup and refusal to cooperate

Type "republitard" again.

Why? You going to open a congressional investigation?

:dl:
 
Why? You going to open a congressional investigation?

why? A Congressional Investigation is why Comey updated his testimony yesterday to disclose that they had found a bunch of emails on the same computer that Anthony Weiner kept his vast collection of Penis Selfies.

Penis-Selfiegate, Day Two a nation under Siege.

Hee hee! Can a brother get a god damn laughing dog??

Fantastic!
 
why? A Congressional Investigation is why Comey updated his testimony yesterday to disclose that they had found a bunch of emails on the same computer that Anthony Weiner kept his vast collection of Penis Selfies.

Penis-Selfiegate, Day Two a nation under Siege.

Hee hee! Can a brother get a god damn laughing dog??

Fantastic!

Help me out here, is Comey a paid shill again yet or no?
 
Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates objected to FBI Director James Comey's decision to notify Congress about his bureau's review of emails related to Hillary Clinton's personal server.

Gosh, Loretta, did Bill ask you to do that while discussing "grandchildren" on a tarmac?

Wait, how were these emails related to her private server again?

Remember, the emails were not to or from Clinton.

The emails contained nothing new with regards to Clinton's case.

The emails had not ever been stored on Clinton's personal server.

So yeah, how exactly are they related?
 
Wait, how were these emails related to her private server again?

Remember, the emails were not to or from Clinton.

The emails contained nothing new with regards to Clinton's case.

The emails had not ever been stored on Clinton's personal server.

So yeah, how exactly are they related?

jeepers! You saw them? lolz, j/k, we know you have not and are repeating spin that you found to your liking.

The bottom line is that the FBI that they were pertinent to the server investigation.

By the way? WaPo calls shenanigans on your claims:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...he-clinton-email-probe-questions-and-answers/
 
The bottom line is that the FBI that they were pertinent to the server investigation.

You may wish to read the Comey letter again, as they most definitely did not say they "were pertinent". The exact phrases were "appear to be pertinent" and "cannot yet assess whether the material may or may not be significant", and as Comey and the rest of the FBI has not read them, he can't really know.
 
Last edited:
jeepers! You saw them? lolz, j/k, we know you have not and are repeating spin that you found to your liking.

The bottom line is that the FBI that they were pertinent to the server investigation.

That's the same corrupt FBI that was in Killary's pocket 2 days ago, yes?

Haha

Your head must be spinning. Can't wait for it to not matter, and for Comey to admit there's nothing there.

Whiplash!
 
We'll see

We've already seen that to the less than critical thinkers, this is a big deal and evidence of how criminal or corrupt Clinton is, despite the FBI's admission that they haven't even read the emails yet.

Even if some classified info is found, this was not Clinton's server, nor Clinton's email, so how exactly would Clinton be culpable?
 
We've already seen that to the less than critical thinkers, this is a big deal and evidence of how criminal or corrupt Clinton is, despite the FBI's admission that they haven't even read the emails yet.

Even if some classified info is found, this was not Clinton's server, nor Clinton's email, so how exactly would Clinton be culpable?

I enjoy when people put "less than critical thinkers" in their blatant strawman fallacies in order to grossly poison the well with an ad hominem.

Because numerous fallacies are the hallmark of critical thinking! :thumbsup:
 
We've already seen that to the less than critical thinkers, this is a big deal and evidence of how criminal or corrupt Clinton is, despite the FBI's admission that they haven't even read the emails yet.

Even if some classified info is found, this was not Clinton's server, nor Clinton's email, so how exactly would Clinton be culpable?

But if they were sent by Clinton and/or from Clinton's server then they are relevant to the investigation. If they contain classified info, that's obviously a problem. If these are unique emails that haven't been turned over previously, then that's another problem. We don't know anything yet but I think it's fair to speculate that there's a good chance these emails at least came through the server. Otherwise, why would the FBI say that they found emails that are related to the investigation?
 
But if they were sent by Clinton and/or from Clinton's server then they are relevant to the investigation. If they contain classified info, that's obviously a problem. If these are unique emails that haven't been turned over previously, then that's another problem. We don't know anything yet but I think it's fair to speculate that there's a good chance these emails at least came through the server. Otherwise, why would the FBI say that they found emails that are related to the investigation?

Worse case scenario, think about it: Work related emails including the 100 or so with classified information are found on Huma's computer because she used it when doing her job.

That's the same thing Comey said Clinton did for which no reasonable prosecutor would indict.
 
But if they were sent by Clinton and/or from Clinton's server then they are relevant to the investigation. If they contain classified info, that's obviously a problem. If these are unique emails that haven't been turned over previously, then that's another problem. We don't know anything yet but I think it's fair to speculate that there's a good chance these emails at least came through the server. Otherwise, why would the FBI say that they found emails that are related to the investigation?


Not to mention Abedin's previous statement under oath that she turned over all the devices with State Department email.

Someone will have to remind me, was Abedin part of the group Comey granted immunity for absolutely nothing in return? If she didn't get it the first time around, or if it's subject to revocation for lying, she might have cause to be nervous. As with the prosecution of General Cartwright, it wouldn't surprise me if the FBI wanted to rehabilitate its image by showing what usually happens to people who mishandle classified information.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom