• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

CIT/Air America Debate Challenge

Planes did make plane shaped holes at the WTC, Ron.

I was commenting about johnnyclueless thinking people are idiots for expecting a plane to make a plane shaped hole at the pentagon as well.


The liars and idiots are all members of your evil movement.


Oh he does.

What?

You don't think CIT is going to release the interviews with the flyover witnesses?



I don't think that--correction: I know with certainty that the frauds and jackasses of the CIT are not going to take their "evidence" to a real news outlet. You see, their "evidence," as always, is total rubbish.
 
LMMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CIT HAS FOUND FLYOVER WITNESSES.

WHO THE **** ARE YOU AGAIN?

Oh, I'm just the guy who has PROVEN that you and your buddies are LOONS of the first order with delusions of unjustified grandeur.

Instead of LMMFAO you might establish some credibility by proving me wrong.


You can't!


 
The nameless guard has a name Ron unlike the majority of the "experts" here at jref.

And perhaps you haven't been paying attention but I keep using words in the plural sense. :D

Ever watch any of CIT's interviews, Ron?


The guard has no name until we see it on the front page of every daily in the nation.

CIT's dishonest interviews are worthless. The liars and frauds distort the words of witnesses who insist that saw a plane hit the Pentagon.
 
WHO THE **** ARE YOU AGAIN?

I'll tell you something. If you EVER get a legitimate News Source to support your loony crap, I will reveal my identity and DESTROY your outlandish dishonest, delusional theories once and for all.
 
CIT is the absolute laughing-stock of your silly movement. Nobody believes anything they say. When are you going to take your "evidence" to the proper authorities and do something. Up until now, you've done nothing but prove yourselves to be clowns, frauds and completely ridiculous. You do know that the very few who have heard of CIT think you're completely ridiculous, right?

I don't believe that is an accurate reflection of how the truth movement feels regarding the eyewitness testimonials brought forward by CIT.

Perhaps you think LaGasse, Turcios, Brooks, Boger, Stephens, Paik, etc etc are "a laughing stock" of 9/11 but I don't and to date I can't find someone else who does either unless they have a hatred for all Arabs and love for all things Bush. I'm sure you fall into this category.

Now that CIT has found flyover witnesses I'm sure this won't be acceptable enough to neonazicons like yourself and now will move the goalposts to demanding we find a passenger from the flight you claimed hit the pentagon still alive somewhere............
 
Oh, I'm just the guy who has PROVEN that you and your buddies are LOONS of the first order with delusions of unjustified grandeur.

Instead of LMMFAO you might establish some credibility by proving me wrong.


You can't!

I don't really consider Lagasse, etc to be my "buddies".

Nor do I believe you have done anything to tarnish their testimony even if you are a super anonymous armchair research authoritive.
 
I don't believe that is an accurate reflection of how the truth movement feels regarding the eyewitness testimonials brought forward by CIT.

Perhaps you think LaGasse, Turcios, Brooks, Boger, Stephens, Paik, etc etc are "a laughing stock" of 9/11 but I don't and to date I can't find someone else who does either unless they have a hatred for all Arabs and love for all things Bush. I'm sure you fall into this category.

Now that CIT has found flyover witnesses I'm sure this won't be acceptable enough to neonazicons like yourself and now will move the goalposts to demanding we find a passenger from the flight you claimed hit the pentagon still alive somewhere............

Blah blah blah...you do realize that all your witnesses claim to have seen the plane hit the building. You guys actually debunked yourselves right from the start. You should have been smarter than that...you do realize this, correct? You have nothing. You never did. You can fight and fight and fight all you want...but in the end... you actually destroyed your own theory from day one. This, and this alone, is why we laugh at you.

It's ok to give up, Dom. You should. The longer you go on, the more of an ass you prove youself to be.

It's funny to watch.
 
Dom;

Your witness on the south parking lot loading doc can see over a 70 foot building? Or has your flyover up the river path been changed to a down the river path?
 
I don't believe that is an accurate reflection of how the truth movement feels regarding the eyewitness testimonials brought forward by CIT.

Perhaps you think LaGasse, Turcios, Brooks, Boger, Stephens, Paik, etc etc are "a laughing stock" of 9/11 but I don't and to date I can't find someone else who does either unless they have a hatred for all Arabs and love for all things Bush. I'm sure you fall into this category.

Now that CIT has found flyover witnesses I'm sure this won't be acceptable enough to neonazicons like yourself and now will move the goalposts to demanding we find a passenger from the flight you claimed hit the pentagon still alive somewhere............

This is further evidence that you are delusional.

Your silly theory has been PROVEN aerodynamically impossible, consequently it is delusional and did not happen.
 
The guard has no name until we see it on the front page of every daily in the nation.

I'm sure Murdoch & Turner will be foaming at the mouths at Bohemian Grove when they catch wind of this......



CIT's dishonest interviews are worthless. The liars and frauds distort the words of witnesses who insist that saw a plane hit the Pentagon.

How about we get LaGasse, Brooks, Etc to appear on Hardlyfire so you can tell them how dishonest they are??

Oh wait you never even watched their interviews to know, huh Ron? (Watch how many times Ron avoids this question ;) )
 
I don't believe that is an accurate reflection of how the truth movement feels regarding the eyewitness testimonials brought forward by CIT.

Perhaps you think LaGasse, Turcios, Brooks, Boger, Stephens, Paik, etc etc are "a laughing stock" of 9/11 but I don't and to date I can't find someone else who does either unless they have a hatred for all Arabs and love for all things Bush. I'm sure you fall into this category.

Now that CIT has found flyover witnesses I'm sure this won't be acceptable enough to neonazicons like yourself and now will move the goalposts to demanding we find a passenger from the flight you claimed hit the pentagon still alive somewhere............



LaGasse despises you liars. Why do you pretend that he supports your insane fabrications? The frauds and fools at CIT have found nobody. The other night, Ranke produced a drunk who pretended to have seen a plane 50 ft off the ground while he was standing behind a 70 ft wall! Mark Roberts gently observed that your "witness" witnessed nothing.
 
INor do I believe you have done anything to tarnish their testimony even if you are a super anonymous armchair research authoritive.

No..you did this yourselves. Some investigative body :rolleyes:. Silly at best.
 
I'm sure Murdoch & Turner will be foaming at the mouths at Bohemian Grove when they catch wind of this......





How about we get LaGasse, Brooks, Etc to appear on Hardlyfire so you can tell them how dishonest they are??

Oh wait you never even watched their interviews to know, huh Ron? (Watch how many times Ron avoids this question ;) )


How many times must I state that I have no interest in your dishonest interviews? When you want to interview the same "witnesses" in the presence of a rationalist, let me know.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom