leftysergeant
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 18,863
Maybe Rummy?Can anyone think of any person Obama could nominate that the right wouldn't object to?
Maybe Rummy?Can anyone think of any person Obama could nominate that the right wouldn't object to?
A group of gay Republicans took out a full-page ad in Thursday’s New York Times, lambasting potential defense secretary nominee Chuck Hagel for opposing an ambassador’s nomination in 1998 because he was “openly, aggressively gay.”
“Chuck Hagel: Wrong on gay rights, wrong on Iran, wrong on Israel,” the ad from the Log Cabin Republicans reads inside the A section. “Tell President Obama that Chuck Hagel is wrong for Defense Secretary. Help us create a stronger and more inclusive Republican Party.”
. . .
Hagel publicly apologized for remarks he made in reference to James Hormel, who was Bill Clinton’s pick for ambassador to Luxembourg, in a statement issued last week.
On that topic, I recommend reading Andrew Sullivan taking apart a Washington Post editorial smearing Hegel. It's a thorough deconstruction of neocon propaganda boilerplate.
http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/12/the-neocons-rally-against-hagel.html
Sieg heil to our resident anti-semites. Our do you consider yourselves anti-zionists?
Can anyone think of any person Obama could nominate that the right wouldn't object to?
So the sneaky Jews at the WP don’t want to put their names on the editorial?
He's going to do it according to the Washington Post.
Obama picks Chuck Hagel as next defense secretary, setting up likely confirmation fight
Will Hagel be Borked? McCain and his buddies are still sore that Hagel endorsed Obama in 2008.
If Obama were to nominate George C Marshall as Secratary Of Defense , the Right Wing would be against him.
Hagel is not my first choice, but the "charges" against him are silly.
Not to defend or excuse his remarks, but the country as a whole has come a long way on gay rights in the last 14 years. My own position has evolved considerably in that time span. Perhaps Hagel's position has evolved too.
Ever notice how Obama doesn’t have the guts to first nominate someone and then stand by that decision. He leaks the name and then sees what flack hits them.
You will be, of course, happy to name those resident anti-semites. Right?Sieg heil to our resident anti-semites. Our do you consider yourselves anti-zionists?
You will be, of course, happy to name those resident anti-semites. Right?
Asia Times said:[...] Hagel is an extraordinary person for the US president to walk with at this point in America's trajectory as the world's lone superpower with a military budget that outstrips the rest of the world combined.
Obama underscored it by saying his choice of Hagel is "historic", since the former senator would be the "first from the enlisted ranks" to serve as secretary of defense and "one of the few secretaries who have been wounded in war" who would know "war is not an abstraction... [he] understands that sending young Americans to fight and bleed in the dirt and mud, that's something we only do when it's absolutely necessary." [...]
Politico said:The Senate was set to vote at 4:15 on Thursday afternoon to end debate over the nomination of Chuck Hagel — a vote that appeared likely to fail, but which Democratic leaders wanted in order to try to cast Republicans as obstructionist.
Hagel’s path to the Pentagon struck a major roadblock on Thursday when Senate Democrats appeared short of the 60 votes needed to move forward, throwing the nomination into limbo as Congress prepared to skip town for a weeklong recess. [...]