Christophera's Other Conspiracy

[Z]

Two days after the declaration of perjury was signed which "states that all parties are hereby notified, meaning the notification HAS been mailed."

It means that this letter is the notice. "Hereby" means "by this note".

So once you received this, that means all parties had been notified. That letter acts as notification.

What a dimwit.

 

[Z]

zlizard is not American ...QUOTE]


Curious... somehow, I thought being born in Phoenix, AZ, USA, and raised in parts of Florida, USA, graduating high school from Arcadia, Florida, USA, serving for ten years in the Unites States Army (Field Artillery), marrying a citizen born and raised in Arcadia, Florida, USA, voting in the last three elections, etc. was a pretty good indicator that I was an American.

In fact, the only time I've ever left the country was during my service in the Military, when I was stationed in Florida.

My bloodline, part of it anyway, has been here a VERY long time, being part Apache. The rest of me arrived at various times; part seven generations ago, part unknown, but at least three generations ago.

So what, exactly, is it that makes you claim - twice now - that I'm not an American?

 

[Christophera]

So what, exactly, is it that makes you claim - twice now - that I'm not an American?

I am so ashamed of you.

 

[Christophera]

Christopher, I'm sorry but that just is not possible. The doctor was granted a continuance to December 2. On December 2, you should have been able to appear in court, and present your underlying case. The doctor's "perjury" on the continuance form had nothing to do with your underlying claim.

Even if you never received the request for the continuance in the mail (which you did), you would have found out about the new date on October 11 when you showed up.

Did you appear on December 2? Did you ever present the underlying facts of the case?

From what I gather, you became enmeshed in some sort of argument about perjury, demanded that the judge recuse him/herself and then I'm not sure what happened. Would you please state chronologically what happened in your small claims case from start to finish?

The continuance with perjury was filed 2 days before the mailing date, I did not recieve it early enough to know the October 11 trail was cancelled, the court did not know the new trial date. I learned it when I picked up mail the next day (I had been out of town for a week).

Here is the history of posts that don't matter to you because you don't recognize violations of state laws of perjury and how they relate to proper notice.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2198631#post2198631

Your ability to read and interpret just ain't what you would like it to be.

The request for continuance, state court document states that all parties are hereby notified, meaning the notification HAS been mailed.

I do not state that I recieved the letter on October 4, the cancellation date on the envelope SHOWS October 4. That is the date of mailing, not the date I recieved it.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2202239#post2202239

You keep trying to pretend you did not misinterpret the documents linked from the message that correctly explained them. The cancellation mark is applied the day the mail is deposited in the mailbox by the sender. Two days after the declaration of perjury was signed which "states that all parties are hereby notified, meaning the notification HAS been mailed."

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2198631#post2198631

The clerk that stamped my MOTION TO DISQUALIFY the judge that failed to recognize the perjury was really disgusted. The clerks do not like it when the documents that they certify for the state under law are ignored for their lawfull meaning. Of course that will have little meaning to you.

The judge that failed to recognize the perjury recused herself from the hearing scheduled at the hearing of the MOTION TO DISQUALIFY.

The MOTION DISQUALIFY was another case 2 years later.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2202813#post2202813

You are dense. I've already explained it on his very page.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2197208#post2197208

The legal abuse was that the judge in the small claims case accepted the perjury on the state court documents, the falsified documents the Ph.D. presented and the perjury about them and dismissed my case.

By presenting the perjury on state court documents I proved to the small claims judge that the Ph.D was capable of the fraud he was charged with and that his integrity to testify was too compromised for the court to rely on.

If you cannot see that destruction of evidence in 3000 capital crimes is a violation of due process and law, no one can expect you to see that perjury on state court documents is a violation of state law criminally punishable. You accept lawlessness by authority, it is clear no small clarifications/corrections I make will matter here. You do not value reason, logic or lawful behaviors.

 

[Z]

I am so ashamed of you.

Like that means something? In fact, I'll take that as a compliment.

There you have it, Gentle Reader: not only was Chrissy totally blasted on his 'concrete core' thread, revealed as a liar and an ignoramus; now he's resorting to No True Scotsman nonsense on the basis of his personal feelings.

Oh, and isn't it interesting that his whining and moaning over the Oct. 11 date seems to be due to his own problem - that he was out of town for a week?

What, is the court supposed to track him down personally to tell him the trial was postponed???

lol

Chris, you ain' never gonna change. You gonna be rat-stupid yo whole life.

Luckily, it won't matter, since nothing you do will ever affect much of anyone.



Happy X-Mas, silly fool.

 

[Loss Leader]

Here is the history of posts that don't matter to you because you don't recognize violations of state laws of perjury and how they relate to proper notice.

Christopher, you haven't answered my question. I'll try again.

Sometime in 2002, you filed a small claims suit against Dr. Brooks. Trial was scheduled for October 11. On about October 2, Dr. Brooks asked for a continuance and was granted one until December 2 at 1:15 p.m.

I understand that you think the doctor perjured himself in the way he asked for the continuance.

You showed up for court October 11 but were informed the trial would not be that day.

What happened next in this case? Did you go back to court on December 2? Did you have your small claims trial against the doctor? What happened in that trial?

Please don't tell me again that the doctor committed perjury. I understand you believe he committed perjury in the procedure of the small claims case. I am asking about the substance of that case. What was that small claims case about and how did it turn out?

 

[Loss Leader]

In fact, the only time I've ever left the country was during my service in the Military, when I was stationed in Florida.

I realize many people would disagree, but I'm told that Florida is now considered part of the country.

I know. It makes me a little queasy, too.

 

[Z]

I realize many people would disagree, but I'm told that Florida is now considered part of the country.

I know. It makes me a little queasy, too.

Heh. THat should read 'stationed in Korea'. Heh.

Shouldn't be posting after drinking...

 

[Spektator]

Korea? So that's why we were never able to find Sea World!

 

[Christophera]

Christopher, you haven't answered my question. I'll try again.

Sometime in 2002, you filed a small claims suit against Dr. Brooks. Trial was scheduled for October 11. On about October 2, Dr. Brooks asked for a continuance and was granted one until December 2 at 1:15 p.m.

I understand that you think the doctor perjured himself in the way he asked for the continuance.

You showed up for court October 11 but were informed the trial would not be that day.

What happened next in this case? Did you go back to court on December 2? Did you have your small claims trial against the doctor? What happened in that trial?

Please don't tell me again that the doctor committed perjury. I understand you believe he committed perjury in the procedure of the small claims case. I am asking about the substance of that case. What was that small claims case about and how did it turn out?

The Request for continuance, a state court document. uses the post tense Hereby notified, for those who are challenged with language this means the act has already been done, ie "mailed" and within the accepted reasoning for the creation of the state laws of proper notice for legal proceedings. The ph.D DID commit perjury upon state court documents.

Had the Ph.d. actually mailed it when he declaerd he did, I would have recieved it by the 4th of October and would have known the hearing of October 11 was coninued.

Thi IS the reason for the due process.

Your integrity to reason is seriously compromised because you are pretending that you do not understand this, along with at least one other here.

On the 11th I appeared and the hearing was continued which the cour did not know.

On Decenber 2, I presented the perjury to the judge to demonstrate that the falsified documents the Ph.D was presenting, and the perjurous testimony describing the documents, were indeed factually questionable in relation to his proven ability and character to present perjury to the state.

The judge, siding with authority defying facts and reason, accepted all of the perjury and falsified documents and dismissed the case against the Ph.D.

The judge that recused herself at the MOTION TO DISQUALIFY 2 years later did so because the Ph.d HAD committed perjury on the state court documents which I presented on December 2 to show the character of the Ph.d regarding his willingness to commit fraud and the judge had refused to recognize the violation of state law depriving me of equal protection of law. The request for continuance was an exhibit in the MOTION TO DISQUALIFY.

You can stop pretending now.

 

[Christophera]

Heh. THat should read 'stationed in Korea'. Heh.

Shouldn't be posting after drinking...

Alcohol separates one from their spiritual depth. Explaining why you feel the way you do about love.

I understand the sacred knowledge of indigneous Americans. They know that love exists because love protects life. Law also protects life. Freedom is a place for love to grow.

No wonder your reptilian instincts dominate you to the point where you are afraid to use your real name and instead indetify with a the reptilian in a fantasy of power

Power must serve love, or it destroys those who seek it, honor and serve it.

 

[Loss Leader]

I'm sorry, I'm just having the greatest trouble following this. Chris, d the doctor in small claims court for something. There was something he did or did not do that you felt he owed you money for.

On December 11, there was a trial about that issue.

At that trial, I understand that you showed the request for a continuance to impeach the doctor's credibility. I understand that the judge did not at that time pay much attention to that.

What I do not understand is: 1. What was your underlying claim? What was the reason you were claiming the doctor owed you money? 2. Did you ever present any evidence of your underlying claim (in the form of your own testimony or documents or anything)? 3. Did the doctor ever answer your underlying claim? 4. Did the judge ever rule on whether you had proven that the doctor owed you money for anything?

Please stop telling me about my integrity and the fact that I'm pretending not to understand. Please just answer my questions. I cannot understand your story and I very much want to.

 

[Christophera]

.On Decenber 2, I presented the perjury to the judge to demonstrate that the falsified documents the Ph.D was presenting, and the perjurous testimony describing the documents, were indeed factually questionable in relation to his proven ability and character to present perjury to the state.

The judge, siding with authority defying facts and reason, accepted all of the perjury and falsified documents and dismissed the case against the Ph.D.

I'm sorry, I'm just having the greatest trouble following this. Chris, sued the doctor in small claims court for something. There was something he did or did not do that you felt he owed you money for.

These points are unimportant here. The perjury of the Ph.D. and th einability of the judge is important. If we se you are trying to ignore that and find somethign wrong with what I'm doing we know you support lawless authority and this entire chain of posts you've triggered are simple manipulation.

Malpractice and fraud were the charges. A damaging evaluation for ADHD and fraud in the production of a promised and paid for letter documenting PTSD.

On December 11, there was a trial about that issue.

No, he requested a continuance and the trial was set for December 2. Notce was declared already MAILED under penalty of perjury but not mailed until 2 days later.

At that trial, I understand that you showed the request for a continuance to impeach the doctor's credibility. I understand that the judge did not at that time pay much attention to that.

What I do not understand is: 1. What was your underlying claim? What was the reason you were claiming the doctor owed you money? 2. Did you ever present any evidence of your underlying claim (in the form of your own testimony or documents or anything)? 3. Did the doctor ever answer your underlying claim? 4. Did the judge ever rule on whether you had proven that the doctor owed you money for anything?

Please stop telling me about my integrity and the fact that I'm pretending not to understand. Please just answer my questions. I cannot understand your story and I very much want to.

1.& 2. The doctors damaging evaluation was it's own proof containing many things which had nothing to do with an ADHD evaluation. The judge had no problem with this. 3. Doctor produced a letter he claimed had been sent to me and and an invoive he claimed was upaid. I had paid in cash and asked that he sent an invoice with the promised product letter for PTSD. His letter did not address PTSD, it was more damaging fabrivations intended to support his case. The judge required no answer beyond that and dismissed my claim.

A Ph.D proven beyond a shadow of a doubt with prima facie evidence to be inviolation of state laws of perjury was believed without question and that Ph.D was a psychlogist.

Add this to the fact that the American Psychological Association cannot respond rationally to inquiry regarding historically established aspect of psychology, and the authority of the mind, has a behavioral problem.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=4704&stc=1&d=1167100808

 

[Z]

Alcohol separates one from their spiritual depth. Explaining why you feel the way you do about love.

I understand the sacred knowledge of indigneous Americans. They know that love exists because love protects life. Law also protects life. Freedom is a place for love to grow.

No wonder your reptilian instincts dominate you to the point where you are afraid to use your real name and instead indetify with a the reptilian in a fantasy of power

Power must serve love, or it destroys those who seek it, honor and serve it.

Never been afraid to use my real name. It's easily discovered by anyone with a lick of intelligence.

But like so many native Americans, Orientals, and others steeped in ancient, Earth-based traditions, I take on names that match my identities. On the Internet, I have always been and shall always be the Astral Dragon, or ZaayrDragon. Among my spiritual peers, I am both Dragon and Wolf.

My name is Waco White Wolf Tohausen. It was formerly Waco Hill, but I had it altered to take back my family name (To Hau Sen) and add my totem identity (given me by my shaman grandfather when I was a small child).

I have no fear of anything, Chrissy. You, however, fear the truth, fear education, fear reality.

Well, that's life for you.

BTW - you got some weird ideas about what the indigenous Americans believed in...

 

[Zep]

Gentlefolk, PLEASE!

As a Christmas wish from me for Chris's benefit, PLEASE DO NOT ENGAGE CHRIS ANY LONGER IN THIS FARCE OF A THREAD. Leave it. Drop it. Do NOT contribute it any further. You are not helping him, your input however heartfelt is lost on him, and all we are seeing is incoherent chaos.

All this thread has become is a soapbox for Chris to reinforce his own views of reality, as warped and self-destructive as we may find them. To continue to pander to such activity is clearly unproductive for all concerned.

Chris, again - as a number of us here have urged you: SEEK COMPETENT HELP. Today. Do it as a New Year resolution, OK?

 

[Christophera]

Gentlefolk, PLEASE!

As a Christmas wish from me for Chris's benefit, PLEASE DO NOT ENGAGE CHRIS ANY LONGER IN THIS FARCE OF A THREAD. Leave it. Drop it. Do NOT contribute it any further. You are not helping him, your input however heartfelt is lost on him, and all we are seeing is incoherent chaos.

All this thread has become is a soapbox for Chris to reinforce his own views of reality, as warped and self-destructive as we may find them. To continue to pander to such activity is clearly unproductive for all concerned.

Chris, again - as a number of us here have urged you: SEEK COMPETENT HELP. Today. Do it as a New Year resolution, OK?

My point which is proven very well is that there is no competent help. That should be a concern to you is you are sincere with your post.

It should also be a concern that I have shown that the courts will not recognize, follow and uphold laws.

Since you have no interest in "competent help" and do not comment on the proven inequities of the courts, you are basically proving you are sociopathic and unsavory to civilization, or at leat unable to contribute meaningfully to it.

This is shown as acute because 3,000 were murdered on 9-11 and there have been many deaths locally here which I've shown, the challenges by Sezme that starts this thread, and there have been many deaths elewhere from extreme behaviors and all you can do is inanely recommend that I seek competent help when I've proven such does not exist.

You are not reasonable and will not reason.

 

[Christophera]

BTW - you got some weird ideas about what the indigenous Americans believed in...

Not weird, sacred.

An Abanaki (Keepers of the Eastern gate) Medicine man saw this image and said, "The great Shrine of the West." John Danner (points of Llight Foundation), a Choctaw (Keepers of the Eastern gate) said "The spark of Unity", The local people, the Samala (Keepers of the Western gate) or Chumash call it "The Grandmother shrine."

They trust me because I understand them and their knowledge of the unconscious mind. You know nothing of that sacred knowledge because of fear. Your people were hunted down and killed for their knowledge.
I am white, but this knowledge was known by my ancient Celtic ancestors and I recognize it as real.

You do not. Why?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=4726&stc=1&d=1167184991

 

[yodaluver28]

Gentlefolk, PLEASE!

As a Christmas wish from me for Chris's benefit, PLEASE DO NOT ENGAGE CHRIS ANY LONGER IN THIS FARCE OF A THREAD. Leave it. Drop it. Do NOT contribute it any further. You are not helping him, your input however heartfelt is lost on him, and all we are seeing is incoherent chaos.

All this thread has become is a soapbox for Chris to reinforce his own views of reality, as warped and self-destructive as we may find them. To continue to pander to such activity is clearly unproductive for all concerned.

Chris, again - as a number of us here have urged you: SEEK COMPETENT HELP. Today. Do it as a New Year resolution, OK?

I couldn't possibly agree more. We could go on and here and turn this thread into another 200+ page and 10,000+ post monster thread, but what would be the point?

Let it go.

 

[Christophera]

I couldn't possibly agree more. We could go on and here and turn this thread into another 200+ page and 10,000+ post monster thread, but what would be the point?

Let it go.

You've seriously overestimated the lure of this, the "other conspiracy". There are posters here just for the purpose of working to discredit me in reduce my effectiveness in the other thread.

I'm here because this thread has a potential for contributing something good. The other one is about exposing something bad.

For example; I just put a question, fully evidenced in its basis, to zlizard who has been blowin' smoke. Now he's shut up and has nothing to say because I'm finally down to something he should be able to talk about but can't, because it is unconscious for him..

 

[Z]

I was going to reply, but frankly I've lost all interest in Chris. He may spout all he wishes about Canadian indians, the honorable Chumash, and the sell-out Choctaw all he likes. I just don't care any more.

It's pretty obvious all his ranting and raving is meaningless, and that no one ever takes him seriously. He's been proven wrong so often it's like a running joke. My details have been here, but he's claimed I was a woman, I was a Christian, I was not American... etc. He claims an amazing memory, but couldn't remember such things as details in his interview of the time-travelling Indian, the name of the popular show Ally McBeal, any exact details of when this imaginary documentary aired, etc. He's been caught in lie after lie, in goof after goof, so often that he could tell you the sun came up today, and you'd have to check for yourself to be sure.

Spiritually, he's still living in the 12th century; intellectually, he's never managed more than an eighth-grade education; socially, he's a sad running gag. He's insignificant, and I have more interesting game to pursue.

Just fyi to the passing reader: 'my people', the Chiricahua Apache, were among the last to give in to the reign of the White European-descended invaders. The tribes he mentioned all capitulated very early on, and the Choctaw even became an entity of the government, and still are. Yet he trusts their mystics and medicine men? Please.

So croon and crow all you like, Chris. Make any wild claim and facetious lie you like about me. I know when it is time to move on, and seek a worthy adversary. You are insignificant, and your bleating is beneath contempt.

Seek help.