• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Christophera's Other Conspiracy

zaayrdragon said:
I was going to reply, but frankly I've lost all interest in Chris. He may spout all he wishes about Canadian indians, the honorable Chumash, and the sell-out Choctaw all he likes. I just don't care any more.

It's pretty obvious all his ranting and raving is meaningless, and that no one ever takes him seriously. He's been proven wrong so often it's like a running joke. My details have been here, but he's claimed I was a woman, I was a Christian, I was not American... etc. He claims an amazing memory, but couldn't remember such things as details in his interview of the time-travelling Indian, the name of the popular show Ally McBeal, any exact details of when this imaginary documentary aired, etc. He's been caught in lie after lie, in goof after goof, so often that he could tell you the sun came up today, and you'd have to check for yourself to be sure.

Spiritually, he's still living in the 12th century; intellectually, he's never managed more than an eighth-grade education; socially, he's a sad running gag. He's insignificant, and I have more interesting game to pursue.

Just fyi to the passing reader: 'my people', the Chiricahua Apache, were among the last to give in to the reign of the White European-descended invaders. The tribes he mentioned all capitulated very early on, and the Choctaw even became an entity of the government, and still are. Yet he trusts their mystics and medicine men? Please.

So croon and crow all you like, Chris. Make any wild claim and facetious lie you like about me. I know when it is time to move on, and seek a worthy adversary. You are insignificant, and your bleating is beneath contempt.

Seek help.
Click to expand...

We are all insignificant, your puffery belies your ignorance (hard to imagine).

How you ever determined I trust John Danner (not a Medicine man or a mystic) is beyond me. Do you think of yourself as some sort of devining lizard?
He is a republican that matches the sell out tribe you describe (although I hadn't know that your people considered them that way). However, his phrase, "The spark of unity" well describes what I understand about what Winter Solstice and sun worship were to ALL indigenous people.

Your entire post didn't say a word on that subject underlying your inherent fear of discussion n the subject which is unconscious, so I'm not on your case about that anymore, the point is made.

When you use a fake name and a feminine based avatar with roots in christianity, anybody would mistake you for those things. Sure your not Rosicrucian?

Glad to hear you are up on TV shows, I bet your tribal peers really resspect you for that. It is encouraging to here your people the Chiricahua Apache, were among the last to give in to the reign of the White European-descended invaders. I can tell by your attitude they were great warriors, seriously. My friends the Samala, or "Coastal band of the Chuamsh", still have not given in to the Federal government.

My point is that you can't communicate about your sacred knowledge because of unconsciously learned fear at childhood, actually a reasonable fear because your ancestors were murdered for their knowledge by my sick and twisted ancestors, my deepest apologies and I will say; that if my current white a$$ peers don't freakin' wake up about what the unconscious mind is being used for to do to their world, the one their children will inherent, I'm going to recomend we give it all back to the Indians.
 
Zep said:
All this thread has become is a soapbox for Chris to reinforce his own views of reality, as warped and self-destructive as we may find them. To continue to pander to such activity is clearly unproductive for all concerned.
Click to expand...

Are you trying to say that one of the most competent compliations of psychological research ever is my "own view of reality". Perhaps you are in denial or simply are fearful of the truth of our unconscious existence.

INFERENCE ONE is a valid inference that is derived from the facts of hyperamnesia and IS used by ancient dark factions to program people unconscious mind for extreme behaviros such as those performed by mass murderers.

Maybe it is okay for you to ignore these things, but to make apeals to others to do so is very irresponsible,

Here is the test reference from the book, "emotions and Memory" by David Rappaport. This is the reality of our unconscious mind

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=4769&stc=1&d=1167337746
 

Attachments

  • emomem175.jpeg
    emomem175.jpeg
    76.6 KB · Views: 7
Christophera said:
Are you trying to say that one of the most competent compliations of psychological research ever is my "own view of reality". Perhaps you are in denial or simply are fearful of the truth of our unconscious existence.
Click to expand...

Honestly, Christopher, here are the two possibilities:

1. Millions of Americans have been brainwashed and hypnotically controlled to forget certain memories and to fail to recognize certain ongoing injustices; hat among the conspirators are local, state and federal employees, psychiatrists, engineers, judges, lawyers, bankers and whomever else; and that one man alone has the insight and courage to see through it all.

2. One poor man in Santa Barbara has a mental illness that makes him unreasonably paranoid.

Now, which one is more likely? Which one takes the least energy? Which one takes the least imagination to believe? Which one is consistent with everything we know about social interaction?

Get help today.
 
Loss Leader said:
Honestly, Christopher, here are the two possibilities:

1. Millions of Americans have been brainwashed and hypnotically controlled to forget certain memories and to fail to recognize certain ongoing injustices; that among the conspirators are local, state and federal employees, psychiatrists, engineers, judges, lawyers, bankers and whomever else; and that one man alone has the insight and courage to see through it all.

2. One poor man in Santa Barbara has a mental illness that makes him unreasonably paranoid.

Now, which one is more likely? Which one takes the least energy? Which one takes the least imagination to believe? Which one is consistent with everything we know about social interaction?

Get help today.
Click to expand...

If I didn't have proof that; local, state and federal employees, psychiatrists, engineers, judges, lawyers, bankers were violating laws, many of them specific to covering this knowledge that you wish to ridicule; this in a nation where 3,000 were murdered on 9-11 and due process was violated in each case; number 2. would likely be the answer; if likehoods ruled the universe. Which they do not.

Sure you are lazy

Sure you would rather not imagine.

You imply that we know everything about social interaction. We do not. Much social interaction is controlled by the unconscious mind. Psychologists today are trying to say it doesn't exist.

I'll bet you didn't know that.
 
CCHR = Scientologists, Chris.

PLEASE GET HELP!


ETA: Damn, I posted here against my own advice. :mad:
 
DarkMagician said:
So he's a Scientologist. This explains so much.
Click to expand...

Not a scientologist. I think it is cute how they bash psychiatry for handing out antidepressents to kids who then get violent. Somebody needs to do it, the violence I mean, (just kidding, er, uh joking I mean)

They are not quite as bad as the church of rome, the psychiatrists I mean, the church started a crusades when the people got radical. You remember, "Kill them all, God will know his own."
 
Zep said:
CCHR = Scientologists, Chris.
Click to expand...

Christophera said:
So how does that make them wrong?
Click to expand...

It makes them wrong because Scientology has a long and well-documented history of lying not only about it's own past, agenda, and belief system but lying about the history, behavior, and belief system of those involved in the fields of psychology and psychiatry, which they see as their prime competition in the "self help" market.

The CCHR was created in 1969 by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard himself as a propaganda arm devoted solely to discrediting psychiatry/psychiatrists by alleging that psychiatry was responsible for all the pain, war, and evil in the entire world with more rhetoric than evidence.


Christophera said:
Do you advocate perjury by Ph.d's.
Click to expand...

Where is the perjury? The defendent in the case filed for a continuance which was granted and all parties were notified upon receipt of a copy of the document granting of the continuance.

Please note that the document does NOT state that any parties needed to be notified in advance. It simply states that all parties were notified "hereby", meaning that all parties would be notified by this document itself upon receiving it, not necessarily beforehand. In other words, the defendent had no legal obligation to inform you of his decision to ask for a continuance before contacting the court about the matter. The court was under the obligation to inform you that it had decided to grant the continuance and they did inform you, since you clearly received the notice.

Christophera said:
and failure to appear on subpoena by municipal entities?
Click to expand...

All I see in the document is a municipal entity returning your filing fee and explaining that the arrest and booking records for that city from 120 years prior are not available or at this entity's immediate disposal.

Christophera said:
How about failure to respond to the Freedom of Information Act.
Click to expand...

Again, I don't see the significance? You filed a FOIA in order to obtain the response of the California State Board of Mental Health's to a request by you, forwarded by the Santa Barbara Board of Mental Health, to experiment on sex offenders and drug addicts by having them hypnotized while under the influence of nitrous oxide, is that correct?

Has it occurred to you that there perhaps was no response from the state mental health board? It seems to me quite probable that a bizarre, out-of-the-blue hypothesis with little to no data behind it, suggested for implementation by a layman, would be fairly low on their to-do list.

Christophera said:
I mean how much violation of law do you advocate?
Click to expand...

Except that there's no illegality here. I see a series of decisions that you don't like, therefore you're branding them illegal but they aren't.
 
yodaluver28 said:
Where is the perjury? The defendent in the case filed for a continuance which was granted and all parties were notified upon receipt of a copy of the document granting of the continuance.
Click to expand...

The Ph.D says "I have mailed or personally delivered a copy of this request to the each of the other parties" and he does so on October 1 declared under penalty of perjury in the Request for continuance, a state court document.

The post office stamps it when it is recieved on October 4, three days later as shown on the envelope for mailing notice to opposition, proving perjury on the state court document.
 
Last edited:
Architect said:
Just out of interest, are you claiming that they had served the notice on you (ie by letter) but had no evidence that you had received it, hence it was ultra viries for them to certify that you had been notified?
Click to expand...

Chris; any chance you might respojnd to this wee query?
 
Architect said:
Just out of interest, are you claiming that they had served the notice on you (ie by letter) but had no evidence that you had received it, hence it was ultra viries for them to certify that you had been notified?
Click to expand...

Architect said:
Chris; any chance you might respojnd to this wee query?
Click to expand...

Your points are not within the scope of the legal documentation.

The request for continuance was filed with its declaration 3 days before the letter was mailed. I had not asserted that I had not recived it, I asserted that I had recieved it late and showed that was because it was not mailed when the defendant declared it was which in itself was perjurous and is proven.
 
Chris,

I think you misunderstand my question; are you claiming that in signing the notice, they had to have ensured that you in turn had already had the notice served on you?
 
Architect said:
Chris,

I think you misunderstand my question; are you claiming that in signing the notice, they had to have ensured that you in turn had already had the notice served on you?
Click to expand...

I do not misunderstand. You do. It is not a notice it is a "REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE" and it has a decelartion under penalty of perjury marked with an "X" stating that the defendant has "mailed or personally delivered a copy of this request to each of the other parties." and the signature is dated 10/01/02.

Request for continuance, state court document.

The cancellation on the envelope of 10/04/02 proves perjury

Envelope for mailing notice to opposition, proving perjury on state court document.
 
You've never had the postal srvice talk their time with your mail before???

Dude, I once had a parcel at the local postoffice, I knew that the comapny had sent it... but a week went by without a slip from the postoffice. I went there and asked if they had a pracel with my name on it, and lo and behold they did.

A week later the slip from the post office arrived telling my that my parcel had arrived.

the slip was postmarked 2 days after I checked out the parcel with ID card instead of slip...

Hark me think I hear the black helicopters.

or it just might be a post office fark up... we'll never know.
 
Last edited:
Oh and another question:

Was the letter in picture "a" inside the envelope in picture "b"?
 
Curnir said:
You've never had the postal srvice talk their time with your mail before???

Dude, I once had a parcel at the local postoffice, I knew that the comapny had sent it... but a week went by without a slip from the postoffice. I went there and asked if they had a pracel with my name on it, and lo and behold they did.

A week later the slip from the post office arrived telling my that my parcel had arrived.

the slip was postmarked 2 days after I checked out the parcel with ID card instead of slip...

Hark me think I hear the black helicopters.

or it just might be a post office fark up... we'll never know.
Click to expand...

Those things happen, but not very often. The important thing is the Ph.D falsified documents then lied about them in court.

The envelope is clearly cancelled 3 days after the request for continuance was signed under penalty of perjury establishing perjury. The other documents I had to show the court demonstrated malpractice as well.
 
Folks, please remember: Chris is in serious need of help. DON'T urge him on by responding with him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom