QED.
Christophera's Other Conspiracy
- Thread starter SezMe
- Start date
Christophera
Banned
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 2,760
The letter states that the director of the ethics department left. The punctuation has meaning, but you may not be able to understand it. At any rate, it is incompetent, and unethical to leave your position without dealing with critical issues ralted to your position.
I did follow up the referral and the response was atrocious.
1. I had referred to "ABUSES" Barabasz distorts "minimizing" the issue. A cognitive distortion.
2. I had not asked if the person mentioned was a member of the A.P.A. I know they are not.
3. If the 30 year old paper is "out dated" what is the new reference comprehensive to my issues? Without that information this is a another cognitive distortion of "minimumization"
4. The source is Blacks Law Dictionary, named and attached to the letter, is linked in my letter below.
5. Barabasz does not know that it is absolutely legal to hypnotise a person without their awareness in California so licensure is not competent if it does not include investigation of abuses.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=4622&stc=1&d=1166677891
Attachments
Loss Leader
I would save the receptionist., Moderator
Your paranoia is a symptom of a pervasive, physiological mental illness. Ask any doctor for help today.
Christophera
Banned
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 2,760
Your acceptence of incompetence is a sign of sociopathy. Change your ways before your destroy your relationships in your life.
Maybe you would recomend a perjurous Ph.D to your friends for their children. I spoke to a lady that sued him for malpractive and she's still trying to undo what the bad docter did to her kids brain.
I went to him for PTSD diagnosis for legal abuse. You know, repeated 14th amendment violations, etc. etc. Guess what I got from the judge, more legal abuse as the perjuring Ph.D. sat in court lying about falsified documents. All I was seeking in return was what I had paid him for, or the diagnosis he never provided.
Request for continuance, state court document.
Envelope for mailing notice to opposition, proving perjury on a state court document.
Last edited:
Oliver
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 17,396
I´m just curious, Chris - when was this incident?
ETA: Oh, i see - back in 2002. Don´t you think it´s time to
look forward instead clutching this 4 (5) year old thing?
Last edited:
Loss Leader
I would save the receptionist., Moderator
The document and envelope you attached don't seem to be evidence of anything other than the fact that you sued a person in small claims court and he at some point asked for a later appearance date. If we are supposed to infer anything else, these documents provide no evidence of what it might be.
Christophera
Banned
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 2,760
Somebody just suggested I see a doctor after I've just proven that the nations "psychological experts" are incompetent.
Uh, ........... doesn't medical incompetency and injustice of the courts sound like something to not forget and to instead deal with? If, ....... of course one thinks of themselves as "socially responsible."
Christophera
Banned
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 2,760
So much for your competency with reading.
He declares on October 2 under penalty of perjury that he has notified the opposing party and the letter arrives with the notice to me on October 4. duh.
I showed up in court and the case wasn't even on calendar.
Oliver
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 17,396
To be honest: It sounds like a personal experience thing
to me - so i don´t think that you should generalize this
experience concerning "psychological experts". I made
this kind of error when i was younger and retrospectively
i think i did waste this time but i also learned a painful lesson.
So when will you give up your bad emotions about that
and look into the future instead. You know - the new Year
is a good time to do so and bury old emotions.
Christophera
Banned
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 2,760
To be honest: It sounds like a personal experience thing
to me - so i don´t think that you should generalize this
experience concerning "psychological experts". I made
this kind of error when i was younger and retrospectively
i think i did waste this time but i also learned a painful lesson.
So when will you give up your bad emotions about that
and look into the future instead. You know - the new Year
is a good time to do so and bury old emotions.
Considering that I've shown the leading authority of psychology in the nation cannot competently comment on information of psychology adequately documented, and I've shown that local courts AND pscyhologists are corrupted, IT"S PRETTY SERIOUS.
Here, take another look at something from not to far back, just far enough to mean something to 9-11 (1975), that is really weird.
The cover of a book called, "HUMAN MEMORY"
The index of the book. Dissociation is a phenomena of memory and MUST, reasonably be in the index of this book titled "Human Memory". The term "repression" is also missing from the index.
What kind of implications could this have in the area of "mind control"? How logical, informed and responsible are you?
David Wong
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2006
- Messages
- 1,773
Who's crazier, the crazy man or the man who starts a thread prompting the crazy man for responses?
Oliver
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 17,396
You have to consider that i live in germany and we
don´t have many conspiracy theories at all because
you get into social trouble if you claim something with-
out backing up your claims with hard evidence.
Off course the american government is not a bunch
of angels - that´s my view from my european location.
But you seem to be stuck in bad emotions from the
past and i would like to see that you´re able to get
rid of them to actually change something. Talking
"all day long" in a internet forum does not help you
or others, don´t you think?
Also i think that academics are stuck in the way they
learn their specific areas on universities. So i guess
that nothing is perfect until you try to make it a
littlebit better or accept it the way it is. What do
you think?
BTW: I did watch the pictures but i see no connection
to 9/11 and the second picture implies what i said
about the academics.
Christophera
Banned
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 2,760
Somtimes it takes experience to know what "hard evidence" is. And, in Germany the environemnt might be so tainted that NO one with experience in their right mind would actually support allegations which were true unless their was already social acceptence.
I think you have to start somewhere and its obvious that the official places to get such things done are not functioning.
Free speech, use it or lose it.
I think you are right and what I'm doing is trying to make it a littel bit better by sharing facts with people.
I now mind control was used to create the secrecy that 9-11 was conducted behind. The inability of academics underlines their disability to recognize the FIRST step to mind control, memory control. This means the mind control will be virtually invisible, undetectable, unknown.
Sound familiar?
9-11 did happen did it not? I know it was massive quantities of optimally placed and dsitributed high explosives detonated in a high speed series of delays.
But, because the apathy and distraction of Americans is so great, as well as ignorance, they cannot even see that the core was concrete, or will not. I suspect the truth movement is beginning to realize the truth.
Oliver
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 17,396
I think you see this a littlebit prejudged from your point of view.
The minority here is "rightminded" because the experiences we
made with history. Indeed, we are screaming out loud pretty fast
if something seem to be unfair and the media does the same.
I also would have no problem to accept that it was indeed an
inside job, but my research shows that it´s highly unlikely and
the scenario makes no sense, too.
Personally i think that the american way of free speech
is pretty stupid because no one really cares about making
up the weirdest things. This might be the reason that you
have so much confusion over there. For me it´s hard to
differ between truth and lies on american sites - especially
conspiracy theory sites.
Mhm, but don´t you think that people within a forum
are not the right people to change something? I know
that in the academic world there are a lot of flaws but
since i´m no academic, i guess that i´m not able to change
their minds because they don´t care about my thoughts.
What do you think - do you believe you could change
them?
No, it does not sound familiar to me. What are you implying?
Off course the media influences the people all over the world
and it´s sad to see that americas media partly seems to be
biased and not very concerned about neutrality. This might
be a side effect of the 2-Party system - but i don´t know
for sure.
I believe that 9/11 did happen. But in contrast to your
believes i think that these muslim scholars were able to
pull it off. Most of them are/were studied people and i
know it´s hard to accept. But look into the Iraq-War.
To me it looks like making things and hate even more
present. But what does it change if we are stuck in the
past if the problems are present now?
I have not seen any evidence that the cores were
build of concrete. And even WTC7-CD Expert Jowenko
said that Tower One and Two didn´t look like controlled
demolitions. Somehow you seem to be stucked in your
idea but to me the scenario does not make sense.
And i would suppose that the towers would have
collapsed from the bottom in case of controlled
demolitions - not starting from the impact zones.
What do you think about it?
Loss Leader
I would save the receptionist., Moderator
Christopher, I've examined these documents again and they don't say that.
Your original trial date was October 11. The doctor asked that your trial date be pushed back from October 11. He stated on October 1 that he mailed his request to you. The Court granted an adjournment to December 2 and mailed you that notice on October 2.
You state that you received the notice on October 4.
So, why did you show up in court on October 11? You knew since October 4 that the court date was not October 11 but was now December 2. If you showed up and the case wasn't on the callender, it's because you did not read or understand the notice, not because of anything the doctor did.
In any case, this adjournment was just procedural. It did not affect any of your rights. You still had the right to appear on December 2 and state your case.
The fact that you believe that this letter and envelope demonstrates anything of substance is itself a symptom of your mental illness. Get help today.
Christophera
Banned
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 2,760
Your ability to read and interpret just ain't what you would like it to be.
The request for continuance, state court document states that all parties are hereby notified, meaning the notification HAS been mailed.
I do not state that I recieved the letter on October 4, the cancellation date on the envelope SHOWS October 4. That is the date of mailing, not the date I recieved it.
Christophera
Banned
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 2,760
Accepted, i do have preconceptions about German politics. And, I realize there is a very progressive integrity ridden element that demands fairness and truth. But again, I know there must be deeply rooted power sources that have elements of control that have constant sway over public perceptions.
You have a point, but then on the other hand all the "weird stuff" of free speech could be fake just to confuse people. I've seen enough to know it's not real. So, ... what is it? Where does it come from?
If you think my prejudice is in the way, try American academia. Try the "non profit world" (they suck up to academia but are "corporate") you will be astounded at what they "think" they know. Just try doing something real. Just once, you will see.
Only the people can change anything, I'm communicating with them.
Your post epitomizes the problem with conceptualizing understanding mind control. Meaning that the subject is too deep for this thread and perhaps your individual experience. Examine the text of this page, consider the widespread implications for one side of the brain operating completely independent and unknown to the other.
http://members.tripod.com/truthasaur/twominds1.html
As far as the media issue, you are AT LEAST completely right. It is probably worse than you imply, completely owned and Americans cannot believe that it s so controlled.
I too believe that Muslims did fly the planes. I think they had help with the hijackings. The towers coming down had nothing to do with planes or fires. The planes and fires were put in the mix to create a reason for war against the peoples of the religion of the pilots.
I do not believe that the majority of those people of those religions approved in any way of 9-11. My theory is that the pilots were mind controlled to do what they did. See my response to your previous paragraph on mind control.
If you start at the bottom with towers of that height they fall on surrounding buildings and create massive collateral damage. As it was things were somewhat contained which decreases the need for private investigation. Can there be any doubt that THIS is done by high explosives.
Last edited:
For those not familiar, I work as a dispatcher for a Police department. I answer 911 calls from all sorts of interesting people.
I have dealt with someone who reminds me very much of Christophera. Here is a link:
http://jelinker.homestead.com/jelinker.html
This was a very nice, well educated man, who started to get a little strange (as seen in the link). Eventually he kept getting worse and worse, sounding almost identical to Chris (mind control, corruption, etc). I talked to him quite frequently through my job, and did the best I could to get him help. However, he kept getting further away from reality. At one point he was calling us literally dozens of times, ranting and raving. We sent an officer to try and find him for a welfare check. When the officer tried to talk to him, he freaked out and started to fight. Long story short, John was soon en route to jail, with a stop at the hospital for medical clearance: it took several officers and a K9 to get him in custody. He was then sent to our local mental health facility. He has called me and several of my co-workers to apologize for his behaviour, and he seems to be doing much better now.
Bottom line, Chris, is that you need to get some help. Maybe a regular phsychiatrist is not for you, but at least find a counselor or support group of some kind.
As for us on the board, arguing with him will only make things worse, no matter how rooted in fact your argument is. That's my humble opinion...
I have dealt with someone who reminds me very much of Christophera. Here is a link:
http://jelinker.homestead.com/jelinker.html
This was a very nice, well educated man, who started to get a little strange (as seen in the link). Eventually he kept getting worse and worse, sounding almost identical to Chris (mind control, corruption, etc). I talked to him quite frequently through my job, and did the best I could to get him help. However, he kept getting further away from reality. At one point he was calling us literally dozens of times, ranting and raving. We sent an officer to try and find him for a welfare check. When the officer tried to talk to him, he freaked out and started to fight. Long story short, John was soon en route to jail, with a stop at the hospital for medical clearance: it took several officers and a K9 to get him in custody. He was then sent to our local mental health facility. He has called me and several of my co-workers to apologize for his behaviour, and he seems to be doing much better now.
Bottom line, Chris, is that you need to get some help. Maybe a regular phsychiatrist is not for you, but at least find a counselor or support group of some kind.
As for us on the board, arguing with him will only make things worse, no matter how rooted in fact your argument is. That's my humble opinion...
Oliver
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 17,396
I don´t think so because you forget that we have 13 Parties
over here, 6 in national parlament and the rest on local, state
levels. Your understanding seems to suggest that all these
different parties try to fool our citizens.
But i guess you would agree that germany is not ruled by
secret, jewish illuminat-zionism or something, right?
Off course all these different claims could be disinfo. Even
my words could be disinfo. How do you personally know what
is true and what not? If you differ between truth and lies in
a kind of "gov = wrong" and "contra-gubmint = truth" then
you might end up in a world that looks pretty ugly.
But to make an example: You remeber the no-planers, the
space weapons and the pod theory. This misinfo was coming
from truthers like you. They seem to collect a lot of info and
just chose to adobt anti-gov content and ignore other evidence
that contradicts with their theories.
As i said. I don´t trust your government, too - but i did not
found any hard evidence for an inside job till now. This
Jowenko CD-Expert didn´t even wonder that the towers
collapsed. So why do ignore this expert who is cited so
often from truthers because his WTC7 statements?
I am honest to you, Christopher - the american academic
world isn´t very interesting for me at all. But i will read a
summary if you know a good article about it.
My point was: Why don´t you sign up in an academic forum
which has the kind of experts you´re criticizing?
I don´t live over there so i can´t say for sure if there is some
kind of mind control over there. What i can say is that the
fear- and warmongering looked very suspicious like lying pro-
paganda from my point of view.
For example: With the 6 parties in national german parlament:
An incident like the WMD lies would run for MONTHS within
the press and parlament. I know this from much smaller,
political affairs over here - so i have no reason to believe
in any kind of brainwashing. And we also dont have such
political campaigns like in the us where the canidates act
like clowns in a circus and throw mud at each other. The
elections here are pretty boring concerning "mediamarketing"
and we don´t care about BS like: "He has a lesbian daughter"
or something. If someone sucks, the media and voters rips
him apart.
I would like to hear the "skeptics"-thoughts in here about
that. For me it looks like there is much truth in your thoughts
about it. Even if i don´t think the media was part of an
inside job.
But what do you think about the hijackers confessions? They
actually say "We will do it". Off course i know the articles about
"Atta was addicted" and such stuff but there are million of
details about him that contradicts with this one story. Who
do you tend to believe? Same goes to the other Hijackers,
it´s very well investigated and the "official (worldwide)"
media coverage is pretty plausible if you took the time to
look into it.
So you say that muslim people can´t be angry about america?
Well, if i look into iraq i get pretty angry and if i would live
over there, i would at least wish the us-gov to go to hell.
You may look into these 40 minutes to understand their
intentions. (You have to consider the historical backgrounds
of their countries, too.)
Do you think they thought about collateral damage if they
blew up the towers? Do you think they were too dumb to
crash a real plane into Shanksville or the pentagon?
For me the Photo looks weird but on the other hand i would
suppose that there was a lot of airpressure during the collapse
that forces the relatively "small" building parts away from the
collapse zone - and considering this, it does not look so
suspicious anymore. You also may take into account that
we never saw such a high building collapse. But again - even
"WTC was a controlled demolition"-Jowenko said that
the towers looks nothing like CD and he also didn´t even
wonder that they collapse.
Here´s the full video of him:
(His comments about WTC1&2 starting at 00h31m40s)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6624447947169635420&q=dutch+9/11+duration:long
What do you think about his expert views?