How long has the present party been in control? What was the last part to control and how long was the control it had and did it take control from the party which later took it back? ALT: Are 2 parties tossing control back and forth and the others not getting it?
The present main party is in power since the last elections
but that does not mean that they can do whatever they
want. They need a 1/3 majority within the parlament to
make important decisions - which means that they have to
come to an agreement with other parties to get the 1/3
of votes within the parlament.
Also the parties try to coalite and find a shared course
after and during elections to get more influence within
the parlament but there are always big and controversial
discussions before important changes like reforms on
educational-, social-, health sectors or before changes
within or new laws. Without the 1/3 of votes within
the parlament, the leading party can do nothing.
I would have to say that it has been moved by its politics away from that secret, religious of control. It's media may make it needed for all of the secret control to remain very much in the background. Corporations have no national affiliations, in some ways, so the people dependence on corporations shows how much they control and secret control over them is always present in the economic sectors supporting.
I´m not sure if you are talking about the american
government right now but to be honest: I guess a
two party-system is not very controversial at all.
Somehow it sounds like a 2 party dictatorship to me.
There is no other explanation for the decision to go
into the iraq war without evidence. I would assume
that the Republicans would go crazy after the faked
evidence was revealed but nothing happend. How
controversial is this behavior?
What is true works for the people in the long term and what is a lie does not.
Well, to be honest. A lot of theories within the
truthmovement were false and disappeared completely.
How much of the official story has been completely
disproven? And i know there are flaws within the
official report - especially concerning the foreknowledge.
You are generalizing, a cognitive distortion. There are no truthers like me. Not one. I work alone in sharing, for now, I can tell that others are starting to realize that the groupings you generalize are slipping into disbelief as their information continues to fail for the peoples interests over time.
I apologize if i generalized you - but your concrete core
is a pretty lonesome theory, don´t you think? (No matter
if it´s true or not - you miss the support for your theories)
I agree. And, what they do is about sensationalism and division of the people, just like media. I use raw evidence to qualify official information, and to disqualify it for consistency with the over all in the long term.
It´s sad that you have to be so sceptic about your media.
Living over here i tend to believe them in the first place
but i also listen to what is said "between the lines". But
do you think that every US-media is completely controlled
by the government? Sounds pretty unrealistic to me.
No promoted authority can be trusted. Basically, no one who will use the truth to expose secrets is given power to share on a mass level. I use raw evidence, I
know what I'm looking at.
You might see explosives being used on the picture. For
me it does not look exactly this way because i never
saw a Top-to-Bottom controlled demolition before.
There is too much fear in academia to use truth in the 9-11 matter.
This sounds plausible but to be honest - the schoolars
for 9/11 didn´t find anything that would convince me
so far.
The scholars for truth refuse to admit me to any of their forums. I've applied 3 times. Their secretary left becuase of inequities in the membership. All entities of authority are suspect. Only agreement, upon raw evidence. with reason, between people, has meaning.
But what about other scientific forums beside the 9/11
ones? Did you try it there. Maybe you ask them in small
steps instead frighten them starting the discussion with
built in C4-concrete cores. You may try it from a neutral
view and find the truth between their and your thoughts
because your thoughts seems to be mostly grown from
your thoughts. So you might have made some errors
in your research and you don´t know them (for example).
9-11 was a death ritual invoking the reptilian mind in the population. Lizards do not work together or protect each others interests. Control the information to keep reasoning of the mammalian instincts and the people are disabled from agreement, unity and action
Mhmm, it´s hard to generalize the american people
upon your beliefes. I mean JREF but also the truth-
movement clearly shows that there are a lot of sceptics
out there - on both sides. JREF also have a lot of people
who hate the war and don´t support the bush regime.
But they are sceptic concerning an inside job never-
theless - no matter if they like the neocons or not.
Maybe the answer for you is between their and your
opinion. However - my expieriences with your conrete
thread is, that you ignore a lot of people and their
opinions - and this is pretty annoying to them. And
i was annoyed, too about your ignorance - but i guess
you are a nice person nevertheless.
Good to hear. I hope some German media corporations start buying satellite time to provide alternative news about America from Germany with traditional german editorializations.
We have a good relationship to america - so i wouldn´t
think that we would take every chance to "kick your
asses over there" (kidding
) - but the resistance to
the iraq war was a good sign that we don´t follow
every idea blindly.
The media and courts of America are completely controlled and have been for 20 years.
So you think all media is "contaminated" - no matter how
contradictory the political reports are? And what about the
courts - you have a juror-system and these people are
simple citizens. (and sorrily not very skilled in law at all)
Mind control (you don't know about that) and creation/promotion of authority.
I know a littlebit about it but to me it sounds
very weird and i don´t believe to be a victim of
it. Otherwise i would support my government instead
thinking they are all nuts.
No, Muslims have every reason to be angry with America. America has not acted to secure its information system, vital to its democracy, and through the resulting ignorance and manipulations of its cultures, has lost control of the democracy while the republic is dismantled. From that condition has resulted 9-11 as a false flag reason for war on Muslim countries.
You might be right - the only problem with this thougt
of yours are huge errors to go to war. If they had to
fake the WMD-evidence, they had no plans at all. And
what´s even dumber - they got caught with this lie.
They make themselves look pretty stupid and it´s
hard to believe that this was their goal or that they
are so dumb.
Both mentions of planes are immaterial to the deciding events and so are distractive. Each has it's own purposes, whatever they were. There seems to be evidence that there was a plane 93 somewhere. it may not have been what hit the ground. Here is its role in the WTC.
http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1207667
Air pressure = nonsense.
This is high explosives, well contained and distributed.
Jowenko = nonsense.
I´m not sure if i understood you the right way because
the link shows the weird collapses contrary to the impact
zones and that the second tower fell first.
I´m no expert in these things but they did no good job if
they couldn´t hide the weird collapses. I mean they should
have known where the planes hit and therefore blow it up
in a way that nobody would ask questions.
But as i said - i have to believe in experts since my knwoledge
about controlled demolitions is far beyond the knowledge
of experts.
Why do you think that Jowenko is nonsense. He said that
WTC7 is a controlled demolition. Why shouldn´t he lie about
WTC7 but would lie about tower one and two, too? I
mean it´s his daily job to blow up buildings - not ours.
I don´t know if you took the time to watch his explanation
but does it sound so weird to you? And concerning the
second tower but first collapse - there was much more
weight on top of the impact zone - i guess that was the
reason for the earlier collapse.
- Oliver
